Thornhill A R, Guenther A J, Barbarotto G M, Session D R, Damario M A, Dumesic D A, Snow K
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Int J Androl. 2002 Dec;25(6):352-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2605.2002.00377.x.
The pathogenic relationship between the presence of Y chromosomal microdeletions and male infertility is unclear. Nevertheless, a causal relationship is thought to be probable when loci are shown to be deleted in infertile males but are present in fertile males. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of the Y chromosome is now routinely performed in the evaluation of the infertile male, although, until recently, there has been no consensus on how the diagnosis should be performed and which loci or markers should be analysed. The European Academy of Andrology (EAA) published guidelines for the molecular diagnosis of Y chromosomal microdeletions in 1999. Following these guidelines, our laboratory developed assays that incorporated the suggested primer pairs for the recommended Sequence Tagged Sites (STS). A number of fertile (n = 117), infertile (n = 17) and unknown samples (n = 20) were tested in our laboratory as part of the validation to provide a clinical assay. Two multiplex PCR assays were optimized, each of which examined STS markers in the centre of the AZFa, b and c regions of the Y chromosome. We correctly identified all but one of the 154 samples (according to the expected result based on fertility or previous testing at another laboratory). A single equivocal result was observed for a sample obtained from a known fertile male who appeared to be deleted for a single marker, sY84, in the AZFa region but not the adjacent marker, sY86. Follow-up analysis showed that proximal and distal markers within the same region (sY82 and sY98) were also present. Sequencing the region flanking and including the sY84 primer set revealed a single base alteration under the reverse primer, which probably caused the amplification failure. Furthermore, the sY84 sequence itself was present, as was the flanking sequence 50 bp on either side of both primers. This observation underlines the importance of using at least two closely linked STS markers for the reliable diagnosis of Y chromosome microdeletions as proposed by the EAA guidelines.
Y染色体微缺失与男性不育之间的致病关系尚不清楚。然而,当不育男性中显示出某些基因座缺失而可育男性中存在这些基因座时,人们认为两者之间可能存在因果关系。目前,在评估不育男性时,常规会对Y染色体进行聚合酶链反应(PCR)分析,不过,直到最近,对于应如何进行诊断以及应分析哪些基因座或标记物,尚无共识。欧洲男科学会(EAA)于1999年发布了Y染色体微缺失分子诊断指南。遵循这些指南,我们实验室开发了检测方法,其中纳入了推荐的序列标签位点(STS)的建议引物对。作为验证临床检测方法的一部分,我们实验室对一些可育样本(n = 117)、不育样本(n = 17)和未知样本(n = 20)进行了检测。优化了两种多重PCR检测方法,每种方法检测Y染色体AZFa、b和c区域中心的STS标记物。我们正确鉴定了154个样本中的153个(根据基于生育能力的预期结果或另一家实验室先前的检测结果)。从一名已知可育男性获取的样本出现了一个模棱两可的结果,该样本在AZFa区域似乎缺失了单个标记物sY84,但相邻标记物sY86未缺失。后续分析表明,同一区域内的近端和远端标记物(sY82和sY98)也存在。对包含sY84引物组及其侧翼区域进行测序,发现在反向引物下方有一个单碱基改变,这可能导致了扩增失败。此外,sY84序列本身以及两侧引物两侧50 bp的侧翼序列均存在。这一观察结果强调了按照EAA指南的建议,使用至少两个紧密连锁的STS标记物对Y染色体微缺失进行可靠诊断的重要性。