Suppr超能文献

原发性腹膜癌女性患者的淋巴转移

Lymphatic spread among women with primary peritoneal carcinoma.

作者信息

Eltabbakh Gamal H, Mount Sharon L

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont 05403, USA.

出版信息

J Surg Oncol. 2002 Nov;81(3):126-31. doi: 10.1002/jso.10166.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Our knowledge regarding the pathologic lymphatic spread pattern of primary peritoneal carcinoma (PPC) is limited. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence and the pathologic patterns of pelvic and para-aortic lymph node metastases among women with PPC and those with papillary serous ovarian carcinoma (PSOC).

METHODS

We conducted a prospective study over the last 4 years among women with FIGO stage III and IV PPC and PSOC who had optimal primary cytoreductive surgery (<1 cm residual). The same surgeon performed pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy on all the patients using a similar technique. The same pathologist reviewed all lymph nodes and recorded nodal involvement with cancer, diameter of the largest nodal tumor, capsular integrity, and pattern of immune response (lymphocyte predominant, germinal cell predominant, unstimulated, or lymphocyte depletion). Both groups were compared in their characteristics, FIGO stage, tumor grade, number of lymph nodes, proportion of lymph nodes with metastases, and the pathologic characteristics of the positive lymph nodes.

RESULTS

Eleven women had PPC and 27 had PSOC. Patients with PPC were older than those with PSOC (mean age: 63.2 years +/- 11.0 vs. 57.4 +/- 13.4, P = 0.181). There was no difference in FIGO stage or tumor grade between both groups. There was no difference among the mean numbers of pelvic and para-aortic lymph nodes between women with PPC and those with PSOC (10.8 +/- 7.3 vs. 11.0 +/- 6.7 and 3.0 +/- 3.3 vs. 3.4 +/- 2.1, P = 0.768 and 0.706, respectively). The incidences of pelvic, para-aortic, and pelvic and/or para-aortic lymph node metastases were similar among women with PPC and those with PSOC (72.7% vs. 66.6%, P = 0.701, 72.7% vs. 48.1%, P = 0.172, and 72.7% vs. 77.8%, P = 0.736, respectively). Similarly, pelvic and para-aortic nodal tumor size, capsular integrity, and immune response were similar in both groups. The incidence of significant complications related to lymphadenectomy was low among women with PPC and those with PSOC (9.1% vs. 7.4%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

PPC and PSOC exhibit similar pathologic lymphatic spread patterns. Pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy should be considered among women with PPC in whom the tumor could be optimally cytoreduced.

摘要

背景与目的

我们对原发性腹膜癌(PPC)的病理性淋巴扩散模式的了解有限。本研究的目的是比较PPC患者和乳头状浆液性卵巢癌(PSOC)患者盆腔及腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移的发生率和病理模式。

方法

在过去4年中,我们对FIGO III期和IV期的PPC和PSOC患者进行了一项前瞻性研究,这些患者均接受了最佳的初次细胞减灭术(残留灶<1 cm)。同一位外科医生使用相似技术对所有患者进行盆腔及腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术。同一位病理学家检查所有淋巴结,并记录淋巴结癌转移情况、最大淋巴结肿瘤直径、包膜完整性以及免疫反应模式(淋巴细胞为主型、生发细胞为主型、未受刺激型或淋巴细胞耗竭型)。比较两组患者的特征、FIGO分期、肿瘤分级、淋巴结数量、有转移的淋巴结比例以及阳性淋巴结的病理特征。

结果

11例患者患有PPC,27例患有PSOC。PPC患者比PSOC患者年龄更大(平均年龄:63.2岁±11.0岁 vs. 57.4岁±13.4岁,P = 0.181)。两组之间的FIGO分期或肿瘤分级无差异。PPC患者和PSOC患者的盆腔及腹主动脉旁淋巴结平均数量无差异(分别为10.8±7.3个 vs. 11.0±6.7个以及3.0±3.3个 vs. 3.4±2.1个,P分别为0.768和0.706)。PPC患者和PSOC患者盆腔、腹主动脉旁以及盆腔和/或腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移的发生率相似(分别为72.7% vs. 66.6%,P = 0.701;72.7% vs. 48.1%,P = 0.172;72.7% vs. 77.8%,P = 0.736)。同样,两组的盆腔及腹主动脉旁淋巴结肿瘤大小、包膜完整性和免疫反应相似。PPC患者和PSOC患者中与淋巴结清扫术相关的严重并发症发生率较低(分别为9.1% vs. 7.4%)。

结论

PPC和PSOC表现出相似的病理性淋巴扩散模式。对于肿瘤能够实现最佳细胞减灭的PPC患者,应考虑进行盆腔及腹主动脉旁淋巴结清扫术。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验