Suppr超能文献

精神分裂症重度精神病住院患者的治疗:奥氮平与其他抗精神病药物对比

Treatment of severely psychotic inpatients with schizophrenia: olanzapine versus other antipsychotic drugs.

作者信息

Carrasco J L, Gutiérrez M, Gómez J C, Escobar R, Alvarez E, Cañas F, Bobes J, Gascón J, Gibert J

机构信息

Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2002 Nov;17(6):287-95. doi: 10.1097/00004850-200211000-00004.

Abstract

Nine hundred and ten schizophrenic inpatients suffering from acute psychotic episodes were included in a naturalistic study. Patients were prescribed treatment with olanzapine (OLZ) or with typical antipsychotic (TYP) drugs. Patients receiving another atypical antipsychotic were excluded. Of the whole sample, 483 (53.4%) were treated with olanzapine and 421 (46.6%) with typical antipsychotics. Three specific subpopulations of greater severity were defined: patients with prominent psychotic symptoms, agitated patients, and patients initially treated with intramuscular (i.m.) medication because of their acute clinical condition. Severity of illness was assessed using the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale for severity, the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and the Nursing Observational Scale for Inpatient Evaluation. Baseline differences were adjusted per data analysis. The mean change from baseline to endpoint of overall symptomatology (total BPRS score) was significantly greater in the olanzapine group compared to the typical antipsychotic-treated group, both in the sample of patients with prominent positive symptoms (P < 0.001) and in the sample of agitated patients (P =0.015). Significant differences were also found in BPRS positive scores, BPRS negative scores and CGI scores in these two populations. Patients who had received previous i.m. drugs showed no statistically significant differences in symptomatic improvement between both treatments groups, except for a more favourable response of BPRS negative subscores in the olanzapine group (P =0.015). The results suggest that olanzapine may be considered as a first line treatment for severely psychotic inpatients with schizophrenia.

摘要

910名患有急性精神病发作的精神分裂症住院患者被纳入一项自然主义研究。患者被处方使用奥氮平(OLZ)或典型抗精神病药物(TYP)进行治疗。接受其他非典型抗精神病药物治疗的患者被排除。在整个样本中,483名(53.4%)接受奥氮平治疗,421名(46.6%)接受典型抗精神病药物治疗。定义了三个病情更严重的特定亚组:有突出精神病症状的患者、躁动不安的患者以及因急性临床状况最初接受肌肉注射药物治疗的患者。使用临床总体印象(CGI)严重程度量表、简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)和住院患者评估护理观察量表评估疾病严重程度。每次数据分析时对基线差异进行调整。在有突出阳性症状的患者样本(P < 0.001)和躁动不安的患者样本(P = 0.015)中,奥氮平组从基线到总体症状学终点(BPRS总分)的平均变化均显著大于典型抗精神病药物治疗组。在这两个人群的BPRS阳性评分、BPRS阴性评分和CGI评分中也发现了显著差异。除奥氮平组BPRS阴性子评分的反应更有利外(P = 0.015),之前接受过肌肉注射药物治疗的患者在两个治疗组之间的症状改善方面没有统计学上的显著差异。结果表明,奥氮平可被视为重度精神病性精神分裂症住院患者的一线治疗药物。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验