经前烦躁障碍:是否存在疾病经济负担?

Premenstrual dysphoric disorder: is there an economic burden of illness?

作者信息

Chawla Anita, Swindle Ralph, Long Stacey, Kennedy Sean, Sternfeld Barbara

机构信息

Genentech, Inc., San Francisco, California, USA.

出版信息

Med Care. 2002 Nov;40(11):1101-12. doi: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000032191.26152.90.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the economic burden associated with premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD) by assessing health care service use and related expenditures, work loss, role limitation, and productivity.

METHODS

Women ages 21 to 45, randomly selected from membership of a northern California HMO (n = 1,194), provided prospective daily symptom ratings and survey data on health care use and productivity for two menstrual cycles. Summary measures of 12-month utilization and expenditures based on HMO encounter data also were constructed. Based on daily symptom ratings, we classified women as having minimal (n = 186), moderate (n = 801), and severe (n = 151) premenstrual symptoms, or PMDD (n = 56) and compared health care use and expenditures, predicted values of productivity and work loss, and marginal effects of symptom severity on outcome measures.

RESULTS

Women with PMDD had higher degrees of luteal phase (premenstrual) productivity impairment than those with minimal symptoms. Compared with the minimal and moderate symptom groups, women with PMDD continued to report lower productivity (P <0.01) in the 5 to 10 days after onset of menses (follicular phase). We found little evidence that women spent more time in bed, reduced time at work, or decreased activities at home or school as a result of premenstrual symptoms. As symptom severity increased, the likelihood of health care service use increased only for an emergency department, obstetrician/gynecologist, or alternative medicine provider visit. There were no significant differences in health care expenditures across the symptom groups.

CONCLUSION

The economic burden associated with PMDD manifests itself primarily in reported productivity decrements rather than health care utilization or costs associated with time away from work.

摘要

目的

通过评估医疗服务使用情况及相关支出、工作损失、角色受限和生产力,量化经前烦躁障碍(PMDD)相关的经济负担。

方法

从北加利福尼亚健康维护组织(HMO)成员中随机选取21至45岁的女性(n = 1194),她们提供了两个月经周期的每日症状评分以及关于医疗服务使用和生产力的调查数据。还根据HMO就诊数据构建了12个月使用情况和支出的汇总指标。根据每日症状评分,我们将女性分为经前症状轻微(n = 186)、中度(n = 801)和重度(n = 151)组,或PMDD组(n = 56),并比较了医疗服务使用和支出、生产力和工作损失的预测值以及症状严重程度对结果指标的边际效应。

结果

与症状轻微的女性相比,患有PMDD的女性在黄体期(经前)生产力受损程度更高。与症状轻微和中度组相比,患有PMDD的女性在月经来潮后(卵泡期)的5至10天内仍报告生产力较低(P <0.01)。我们几乎没有发现证据表明女性因经前症状而在床上花费更多时间、工作时间减少或在家或学校的活动减少。随着症状严重程度增加,仅在急诊科、妇产科医生或替代医学提供者就诊方面医疗服务使用的可能性增加。各症状组之间医疗保健支出没有显著差异。

结论

与PMDD相关的经济负担主要表现为报告的生产力下降,而非医疗服务利用或与缺勤相关的成本。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索