• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A strategy for tackling health inequalities in the Netherlands.

作者信息

Mackenbach Johan P, Stronks Karien

机构信息

Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ. 2002 Nov 2;325(7371):1029-32. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7371.1029.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.325.7371.1029
PMID:12411368
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1124499/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
A strategy for tackling health inequalities in the Netherlands.荷兰应对健康不平等问题的一项策略。
BMJ. 2002 Nov 2;325(7371):1029-32. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7371.1029.
2
Tackling inequalities in health: the need for building a systematic evidence base.应对健康不平等问题：建立系统性证据基础的必要性。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003 Mar;57(3):162. doi: 10.1136/jech.57.3.162.
3
[Strategies for action to tackle health inequalities in Germany].[德国应对健康不平等问题的行动策略]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2007 Apr;50(4):484-91. doi: 10.1007/s00103-007-0192-z.
4
Tackling health inequities.解决健康不平等问题。
BMJ. 2008 Sep 3;337:a1526. doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1526.
5
An analysis of the role of health care in reducing socioeconomic inequalities in health: the case of the Netherlands.医疗保健在减少健康方面的社会经济不平等中的作用分析：以荷兰为例。
Int J Health Serv. 2003;33(3):523-41. doi: 10.2190/C12H-NBA4-7QWE-6K3T.
6
Socioeconomic inequalities in health in The Netherlands: impact of a five year research programme.荷兰健康领域的社会经济不平等：一项为期五年研究计划的影响
BMJ. 1994 Dec 3;309(6967):1487-91. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6967.1487.
7
Privatisation in health systems in developing countries: what's in a name?发展中国家卫生系统中的私有化：名称意味着什么？
Reprod Health Matters. 2011 May;19(37):4-9. doi: 10.1016/S0968-8080(11)37565-9.
8
[Contribution of Health Care Research to Establishing Social Equality in Health and Health Care Opportunities].[医疗保健研究对在健康及医疗保健机会方面建立社会平等的贡献]
Gesundheitswesen. 2016 Feb;78(2):91-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-111300. Epub 2016 Feb 23.
9
Tackling health inequalities since the Acheson inquiry.自艾奇逊调查以来应对健康不平等问题。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004 Apr;58(4):262-3. doi: 10.1136/jech.2003.010264.
10
The high point of efforts to improve access to health care by "documentation".通过“记录”来改善医疗服务可及性的努力达到了高潮。
Physician Exec. 1992 Nov-Dec;18(6):12-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Unequal smiles: consequences of untreated dental caries in citizens living in vulnerable circumstances in the Netherlands: an exploratory pilot study.不平等的微笑：荷兰弱势群体未治疗龋齿的后果：一项探索性试点研究。
Acta Odontol Scand. 2024 Oct 3;83:574-581. doi: 10.2340/aos.v83.42028.
2
Evaluation of the promising neighbourhoods community program to reduce health inequalities in youth: a protocol of a mixed-methods study.评价“有前途的邻里社区”项目减少青年健康不平等状况的效果：一项混合方法研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 14;19(1):555. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6901-3.
3
Did the English strategy reduce inequalities in health? A difference-in-difference analysis comparing England with three other European countries.英国的策略是否减少了健康方面的不平等？一项将英国与其他三个欧洲国家进行比较的双重差分分析。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Aug 24;16(1):865. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3505-z.
4
How does an integrated primary care approach for patients in deprived neighbourhoods impact utilization patterns? An explorative study.针对贫困社区患者的综合初级保健方法如何影响医疗服务利用模式？一项探索性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jul 11;16:545. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3246-z.
5
An analytic approach for describing and prioritizing health inequalities at the local level in Canada: a descriptive study.加拿大地方层面健康不平等现象的描述及优先排序分析方法：一项描述性研究。
CMAJ Open. 2015 Oct 21;3(4):E366-72. doi: 10.9778/cmajo.20150049. eCollection 2015 Oct-Dec.
6
Absolute and Relative Socioeconomic Health Inequalities across Age Groups.各年龄组的绝对和相对社会经济健康不平等
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 30;10(12):e0145947. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145947. eCollection 2015.
7
Calling for a bold new vision of health disparities intervention research.呼吁对健康差异干预研究提出大胆的新愿景。
Am J Public Health. 2015 Jul;105 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S374-6. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302386. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
8
How can inequalities in mortality be reduced? A quantitative analysis of 6 risk factors in 21 European populations.如何降低死亡率不平等？对21个欧洲人群中6个风险因素的定量分析。
PLoS One. 2014 Nov 4;9(11):e110952. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110952. eCollection 2014.
9
Educational inequalities in mortality by cause of death: first national data for the Netherlands.按死因划分的死亡率方面的教育不平等：荷兰的首批全国数据。
Int J Public Health. 2014 Oct;59(5):687-96. doi: 10.1007/s00038-014-0576-4. Epub 2014 Jun 27.
10
Do people desire to be healthier than other people? A short note on positional concerns for health.人们是否希望比其他人更健康？关于健康的位置关注的简要说明。
Eur J Health Econ. 2015 Jan;16(1):47-54. doi: 10.1007/s10198-013-0550-8. Epub 2013 Dec 19.

本文引用的文献

1
Using evidence to inform health policy: case study.运用证据为卫生政策提供信息：案例研究
BMJ. 2001 Jan 27;322(7280):222-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7280.222.
2
How policy informs the evidence.政策如何影响证据。
BMJ. 2001 Jan 27;322(7280):184-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7280.184.
3
Explaining educational differences in mortality: the role of behavioral and material factors.解释死亡率方面的教育差异：行为和物质因素的作用。
Am J Public Health. 1999 Apr;89(4):535-40. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.4.535.
4
How should interventions to reduce inequalities in health be evaluated?应该如何评估减少健康不平等的干预措施？
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1997 Aug;51(4):359-64. doi: 10.1136/jech.51.4.359.
5
Socioeconomic inequalities in morbidity and mortality in western Europe. The EU Working Group on Socioeconomic Inequalities in Health.西欧发病率和死亡率方面的社会经济不平等。欧盟健康领域社会经济不平等问题工作组。
Lancet. 1997 Jun 7;349(9066):1655-9. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(96)07226-1.
6
Socioeconomic inequalities in health in The Netherlands: impact of a five year research programme.荷兰健康领域的社会经济不平等：一项为期五年研究计划的影响
BMJ. 1994 Dec 3;309(6967):1487-91. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6967.1487.