Vondra V, Sladek K, Kotasová J, Terl M, Rossetti A, Cantini L
Pneumology Department, Prague, Czech Republic.
Respir Med. 2002 Oct;96(10):784-9. doi: 10.1053/rmed.2002.1348.
This study was carried out with the aim of demonstrating the efficacy and tolerability of beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) aerosol spray 500 microg b.i.d. via a spacer device (Jet, Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A.) using a new HFA-134a formulation or chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) propellant. After having completed a 2-week run-in period, 154 adult patients (77 in each group) with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma were randomised into two groups to receive the study treatment for a duration of 12 weeks in a double-blind, multinational, multicentre, parallel-group design. Morning and evening peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), use of rescue salbutamol, number of day- and night-time asthma attacks, number of night-time awakenings due to asthma and clinical symptoms were recorded daily by patients on diary cards. Pulmonary function tests (FEV1, FVC, PEFR, FEF25-75%, MEF50 and FEF25) and vital signs were measured at the clinic at study entry, at the start of treatment and every 2 weeks thereafter. Morning serum cortisol (8.00-10.00 a.m.) was measured at the start and at the end of the treatment period. Adverse events were recorded throughout the total study period. Significant improvements over baseline were reported in both groups in terms of lung function, symptoms and use of rescue inhaled salbutamol. Equivalence between groups was demonstrated for the primary end-point morning PEFR, as well as for evening PEFR and FEV1. No statistically significant differences in the comparisons between groups, except for FEF25 (P=0.044), were observed in any of the other efficacy variables. Adverse events were reported in 31% of patients in the BDP-HFA group and in 32% in the CFC group. Adverse drug reactions were 4 and 2 in the two groups, respectively. No drug-related serious adverse events were reported in either of the groups. No signs of relevant adrenal suppression were observed in both groups: 2 patients in each group had final values below the normal range. In conclusion, the BDP-HFA-134a formulation proved to be equivalent in efficacy and comparable in safety to the standard BDP-CFC product over 12 weeks in adult patients with mild-to-moderate persistent asthma.
本研究旨在通过使用新型氢氟烷烃-134a(HFA-134a)配方或氯氟烃(CFC)推进剂的间隔装置(Jet,基耶西制药股份公司),证明500微克/每日两次的二丙酸倍氯米松(BDP)气雾剂喷雾的疗效和耐受性。在完成2周的导入期后,154例轻度至中度持续性哮喘成年患者(每组77例)被随机分为两组,采用双盲、跨国、多中心、平行组设计接受为期12周的研究治疗。患者每天在日记卡上记录早晚的呼气峰值流速(PEFR)、急救沙丁胺醇的使用情况、白天和夜间哮喘发作次数、因哮喘导致的夜间觉醒次数以及临床症状。在研究开始时、治疗开始时以及此后每2周在诊所测量肺功能测试(FEV1、FVC、PEFR、FEF25-75%、MEF50和FEF25)和生命体征。在治疗期开始和结束时测量早晨血清皮质醇(上午8:00至10:00)。在整个研究期间记录不良事件。两组在肺功能、症状和急救吸入沙丁胺醇的使用方面均报告了相对于基线的显著改善。在主要终点早晨PEFR以及晚上PEFR和FEV1方面,两组之间证明具有等效性。在任何其他疗效变量中,除了FEF25(P=0.044)外,两组之间的比较均未观察到统计学上的显著差异。BDP-HFA组31%的患者和CFC组32%的患者报告了不良事件。两组的药物不良反应分别为4例和2例。两组均未报告与药物相关的严重不良事件。两组均未观察到相关肾上腺抑制的迹象:每组各有2例患者的最终值低于正常范围。总之,在患有轻度至中度持续性哮喘的成年患者中,BDP-HFA-134a配方在12周内的疗效与标准BDP-CFC产品相当,安全性也具有可比性。