Gagliardi Ricardo Maio, Avelar Rander Pereira
Department of Dentistry, School of Health Science, University of Brasília.
Oper Dent. 2002 Nov-Dec;27(6):582-6.
This study evaluated microleakage in vitro using different bonding agents. Forty-two freshly extracted caries-free human teeth were randomly divided into seven groups of six teeth and restored with different adhesive systems: Single Bond, Prime&Bond NT, Excite, Durafill Bond, Etch&Prime 3.0, Prompt L-Pop and Vitremer as the control group. All groups were treated according to manufacturers' instructions. Class V cavities were prepared on buccal and lingual surfaces (3 x 2.5 x 1.5 mm) of each tooth (12 restorations per group), with gingival margins in dentin. The teeth were restored with Charisma resin composite. After finishing and polishing with Denco-Flex disks, the teeth were thermocycled for 200 cycles (5 degrees C-55 degrees C +/- 2 degrees C, 60-second dwell time). Apical foramina and surfaces around restorations were coated with nail varnish, stained in 50% AgNO3 solution for 12 hours and longitudinally sectioned. Microleakage was evaluated with a stereomicroscope. Marginal penetration was scored on a 0-4 scale. Statistical analysis using the Kruskal-Wallis test revealed significant (p < or = 0.05) leakage at dentin margins for all adhesive systems when compared to the control. Except for Durafill Bond, no significant difference was found between the self-etching adhesives and one-bottle adhesives.
