Marenzi GianCarlo, Lauri Gianfranco, Assanelli Emilio, Grazi Marco, Campodonico Jeness, Famoso Gabriella, Agostoni Piergiuseppe
Centro Cardiologico Monzino, IRCCS, Institute of Cardiology, University of Milan, via Parea 4, 20138 Milan, Italy.
Eur J Heart Fail. 2002 Oct;4(5):597-603. doi: 10.1016/s1388-9842(02)00097-1.
We investigated the relationship between plasma renin activity (PRA) and serum ([sNa(+)]) and urinary ([uNa(+)]) sodium concentrations in 124 congestive heart failure (CHF) patients (II-IV NYHA class) and 20 healthy subjects. According to PRA (> or <3 ng ml(-1) h(-1)) and [sNa(+)] (> or <135 mEq l(-1)), patients were classified as Group A (normal PRA and normal [sNa(+)], n=39), Group B (increased PRA and normal [sNa(+)], n=62) and Group C (low [sNa(+)], n=23). Measurements were performed at rest and, in 26 cases, after extracorporeal ultrafiltration (UF). At rest, [sNa(+)] and [uNa(+)], and their difference ([sNa(+)]-[uNa(+)]), were linearly correlated with PRA, but the values did not allow differentiation of control subjects from patients or differentiation of patients with from those without renin-angiotensin system (RAS) activation. Conversely, the [sNa(+)]/[uNa(+)] ratio showed the best correlation with PRA (r=0.79, P<0.0001). UF-induced PRA changes were linearly correlated with [sNa(+)]/[uNa(+)] ratio changes (r=0.67, P=0.002), but not with those of [sNa(+)], [uNa(+)] and [sNa(+)]-[uNa(+)]. In CHF, the [sNa(+)]/[uNa(+)] ratio best correlates with PRA and reflects the basal activity as well as the rapid changes (as those induced by UF) of the RAS. Therefore, it can be considered a strong and easily available marker of PRA.
我们研究了124例充血性心力衰竭(CHF,纽约心脏协会II-IV级)患者和20名健康受试者的血浆肾素活性(PRA)与血清钠浓度([sNa(+)])及尿钠浓度([uNa(+)])之间的关系。根据PRA(>或<3 ng ml(-1) h(-1))和[sNa(+)](>或<135 mEq l(-1)),患者被分为A组(正常PRA和正常[sNa(+)],n = 39)、B组(PRA升高且[sNa(+)]正常,n = 62)和C组(低[sNa(+)],n = 23)。测量在静息状态下进行,26例患者在体外超滤(UF)后也进行了测量。静息时,[sNa(+)]、[uNa(+)]及其差值([sNa(+)] - [uNa(+)])与PRA呈线性相关,但这些值无法区分对照组与患者,也无法区分有或无肾素-血管紧张素系统(RAS)激活的患者。相反,[sNa(+)]/[uNa(+)]比值与PRA的相关性最佳(r = 0.79,P < 0.0001)。UF诱导的PRA变化与[sNa(+)]/[uNa(+)]比值变化呈线性相关(r = 0.67,P = 0.002),但与[sNa(+)]、[uNa(+)]及[sNa(+)] - [uNa(+)]的变化无关。在CHF中,[sNa(+)]/[uNa(+)]比值与PRA的相关性最佳,反映了RAS的基础活性以及快速变化(如UF诱导的变化)。因此,它可被视为PRA的一个强有力且易于获得的标志物。