• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

欧洲抗凝协调行动(ECAA)。CoaguChek和TAS即时检测全血监测仪可靠国际敏感指数校准所需的最少中心数量。

European Concerted Action on Anticoagulation (ECAA). Minimum number of centres for reliable International Sensitivity Index calibration of CoaguChek and TAS point-of-care whole blood monitors.

作者信息

Poller L, Keown M, Chauhan N, van den Besselaar A M H P, Tripodi A, Shiach C, Jespersen J

机构信息

ECAA Central Facility, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Manchester, 3 239 Stopford Building, M13 9PT, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Thromb Res. 2002 Jul 15;107(1-2):61-6. doi: 10.1016/s0049-3848(02)00179-2.

DOI:10.1016/s0049-3848(02)00179-2
PMID:12413591
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Prothrombin time (PT) test systems require multicentre calibration for reliable International Sensitivity Index (ISI). Multicentre calibration of CoaguChek Mini and TAS PT-NC point-of-care test (POCT) systems is less precise than conventional PT testing. The aim of the present study was to determine the number of centres required to give reliable ISI and International Normalised Ratio (INR) with these two POCT whole blood PT monitors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A simulation study, based on results of a 10-centre calibration exercise, was performed to assess reliability of ISI and INR when the number of centres was reduced from 10 to 2.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

With both systems, the range of ISI and INR deviation increased as the number of centres was reduced. For the CoaguChek Mini, at least five centres were needed for satisfactory INR deviation in 95% of calibrations. With the TAS PT-NC, three centres gave satisfactory INR at this level. The number of centres required for multicentre calibration of these two POCT PT systems is greater than the two proposed by World Health Organisation (WHO) Guidelines for conventional PT testing.

摘要

引言

凝血酶原时间(PT)检测系统需要进行多中心校准以获得可靠的国际敏感指数(ISI)。CoaguChek Mini和TAS PT-NC即时检测(POCT)系统的多中心校准不如传统PT检测精确。本研究的目的是确定使用这两种POCT全血PT监测仪获得可靠的ISI和国际标准化比值(INR)所需的中心数量。

材料与方法

基于一项10中心校准实验的结果进行了模拟研究,以评估当中心数量从10个减少到2个时ISI和INR的可靠性。

结果与结论

对于这两种系统,随着中心数量的减少,ISI和INR偏差的范围增大。对于CoaguChek Mini,在95%的校准中,至少需要五个中心才能获得令人满意的INR偏差。对于TAS PT-NC,三个中心在此水平下可获得令人满意的INR。这两种POCT PT系统进行多中心校准所需的中心数量大于世界卫生组织(WHO)传统PT检测指南建议的两个。

相似文献

1
European Concerted Action on Anticoagulation (ECAA). Minimum number of centres for reliable International Sensitivity Index calibration of CoaguChek and TAS point-of-care whole blood monitors.欧洲抗凝协调行动(ECAA)。CoaguChek和TAS即时检测全血监测仪可靠国际敏感指数校准所需的最少中心数量。
Thromb Res. 2002 Jul 15;107(1-2):61-6. doi: 10.1016/s0049-3848(02)00179-2.
2
European Concerted Action on Anticoagulation. Evaluation of a method for International Sensitivity Index calibration of two point-of-care prothrombin time (PT) monitoring systems (CoaguChek Mini and TAS PT-NC) with fresh plasmas based on whole-blood equivalent PT.欧洲抗凝协作行动。基于全血等效凝血酶原时间(PT),使用新鲜血浆对两种即时检测凝血酶原时间(PT)监测系统(CoaguChek Mini和TAS PT-NC)进行国际敏感指数校准方法的评估。
Clin Chem. 2002 Oct;48(10):1672-80.
3
European Concerted Action on Anticoagulation (ECAA): multicentre international sensitivity index calibration of two types of point-of-care prothrombin time monitor systems.欧洲抗凝协调行动(ECAA):两种即时检测凝血酶原时间监测系统的多中心国际敏感指数校准
Br J Haematol. 2002 Mar;116(4):844-50. doi: 10.1046/j.0007-1048.2002.03361.x.
4
European Concerted Action on Anticoagulation (ECAA). An assessment of lyophilised plasmas for ISI calibration of CoaguChek and TAS whole blood prothrombin time monitors.欧洲抗凝联合行动(ECAA)。冻干血浆用于CoaguChek和TAS全血凝血酶原时间监测仪国际敏感指数(ISI)校准的评估。
J Clin Pathol. 2003 Feb;56(2):114-9. doi: 10.1136/jcp.56.2.114.
5
European Concerted Action on Anticoagulation. Correction of displayed international normalized ratio on two point-of-care test whole-blood prothrombin time monitors (CoaguChek Mini and TAS PT-NC) by independent international sensitivity index calibration.欧洲抗凝联合行动。通过独立国际敏感指数校准对两种即时检验全血凝血酶原时间监测仪(CoaguChek Mini和TAS PT-NC)上显示的国际标准化比值进行校正。
Br J Haematol. 2003 Sep;122(6):944-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2003.04521.x.
6
European Concerted Action on Anticoagulation--comparison of fresh plasma and whole blood multicentre ISI calibrations of CoaguChek Mini and TAS PT-NC whole blood prothrombin time point-of-care monitors.欧洲抗凝协调行动——CoaguChek Mini和TAS PT-NC全血凝血酶原时间即时检测监测仪的新鲜血浆与全血多中心国际敏感度指数校准比较
Thromb Haemost. 2002 May;87(5):859-66.
7
European concerted action on anticoagulation. Minimum numbers of lyophilized plasma samples for ISI calibration of CoaguChek and TAS point-of-care whole blood prothrombin time monitors.欧洲抗凝协调行动。用于CoaguChek和TAS即时检测全血凝血酶原时间监测仪国际敏感度指数(ISI)校准的冻干血浆样本的最少数量。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2003 Feb;119(2):232-40. doi: 10.1309/25BK-YQEP-6858-GLFD.
8
European Concerted Action on Anticoagulation (ECAA): an assessment of a method for ISI calibration of two whole blood point-of-care PT monitor systems based on lyophilized plasmas using whole blood equivalent PT.欧洲抗凝协调行动(ECAA):基于使用全血等效凝血酶原时间的冻干血浆对两种全血即时检测凝血酶原时间监测系统进行国际敏感度指数(ISI)校准方法的评估。
J Thromb Haemost. 2003 Apr;1(4):766-72. doi: 10.1046/j.1538-7836.2003.00120.x.
9
European concerted action on anticoagulation. Quality assessment of the CoaguChek Mini and TAS PT-NC point-of-care whole-blood prothrombin time monitors.欧洲抗凝协调行动。CoaguChek Mini和TAS PT-NC即时检验全血凝血酶原时间监测仪的质量评估。
Clin Chem. 2004 Mar;50(3):537-44. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2003.019653. Epub 2004 Jan 6.
10
European Concerted Action on Anticoagulation (ECAA): International Normalized Ratio variability of CoaguChek and TAS point-of-care testing whole blood prothrombin time monitors.欧洲抗凝联合行动(ECAA):CoaguChek和TAS即时检测全血凝血酶原时间监测仪的国际标准化比值变异性
Thromb Haemost. 2002 Dec;88(6):992-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Reliability of international normalised ratios from two point of care test systems: comparison with conventional methods.两种即时检验系统国际标准化比值的可靠性:与传统方法的比较。
BMJ. 2003 Jul 5;327(7405):30. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7405.30.