Killingsworth Cheryl R, Melnick Sharon B, Chapman Fred W, Walker Robert G, Smith William M, Ideker Raymond E, Walcott Gregory P
Cardiac Rhythm Management Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1670 University Boulevard, B140 Volker Hall, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.
Resuscitation. 2002 Nov;55(2):177-85. doi: 10.1016/s0300-9572(02)00157-0.
Before recommendations for using an automatic external defibrillator on pediatric patients can be made, a protocol for the energy of a biphasic waveform energy dosing needs to be determined that will allow ventricular defibrillation of 8 year olds while causing only a minimal amount of cardiac damage to infants. Pediatric- and adult-sized electrode patches were alternately applied to 10 isoflurane-anesthetized piglets weighing 3.8-20.1 kg to approximate the body weights of newborns to children < 8 years old. The defibrillation threshold (DFT) was determined for biphasic truncated exponential waveform shocks. Additional shocks, varying from the DFT to 360 Joules (J), were delivered during sinus rhythm or following 30 s of ventricular fibrillation (VF). The DFT was 2.4+/-0.81 and 2.1+/-0.65 J/kg for pediatric and adult patches, respectively (P = N.S.). The change in left ventricular (LV) dP/dt from baseline as a function of shock strength was significantly different at 1 and 10 s after shocks of increasing energy that were delivered in sinus rhythm, and 1, 10, 20, and 30 s after defibrillation shocks. There was no significant difference in LV dP/dt with increasing shock energy at 60 s with either patch size. The time to return of sinus rhythm, ST-segment deviation, and cardiac output were also not significantly different from baseline 60 s following shocks of up to 360 J delivered during sinus rhythm or VF with either patch. The same amount of energy delivered with a biphasic external defibrillator successfully defibrillated VF whether adult or pediatric patches were used. Cardiac rhythm and hemodynamic variables were unaltered at 60 s after shocks delivered at energies of up to 360 J. These data suggest that there is a substantial safety margin above a DFT strength shock for this biphasic waveform in piglets.
在就小儿患者使用自动体外除颤器提出建议之前,需要确定双相波能量剂量的方案,该方案要能使8岁儿童实现室颤除颤,同时对婴儿造成的心脏损伤最小。将儿科和成人尺寸的电极片交替贴在10只体重为3.8至20.1千克的异氟烷麻醉仔猪身上,以近似新生儿至8岁以下儿童的体重。测定双相截断指数波形电击的除颤阈值(DFT)。在窦性心律期间或心室颤动(VF)30秒后,施加从DFT到360焦耳(J)不等的额外电击。儿科和成人电极片的DFT分别为2.4±0.81和2.1±0.65焦耳/千克(P =无显著性差异)。在窦性心律下施加能量递增的电击后1秒和10秒,以及除颤电击后1、10、20和30秒,左心室(LV)dP/dt相对于基线的变化随电击强度的函数有显著差异。两种电极片尺寸在60秒时,随着电击能量增加,LV dP/dt没有显著差异。窦性心律或VF期间施加高达360 J的电击后60秒,窦性心律恢复时间、ST段偏移和心输出量与基线相比也无显著差异。无论使用成人还是儿科电极片,双相体外除颤器输送相同能量都能成功除颤VF。在高达360 J能量的电击后60秒,心律和血流动力学变量未改变。这些数据表明,对于仔猪的这种双相波形,在DFT强度电击之上有很大的安全余量。