Braband Anke, Richter Stefan, Hiesel Rudolf, Scholtz Gerhard
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institut für Biologie/Vergleichende Zoologie, Philippstr 13, D-10115 Berlin, Germany.
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2002 Nov;25(2):229-44. doi: 10.1016/s1055-7903(02)00253-1.
For several decades the relationships within the Branchiopoda (Anostraca + Phyllopoda) have been a matter of controversy. Interpretations of plesiomorphic or apomorphic character states are a difficult venture, in particular in the Phyllopoda. We explore the relationships within the Phyllopoda at the level of nucleotid comparisons of the two genes 12S rDNA (mitochondrial) and EF1alpha (nuclear), and at a higher molecular level based on introns found in the gene EF1alpha. Within the Phyllopoda our explorations show further evidence for a non-monophyletic Conchostraca (Spinicaudata + Cyclestherida + Laevicaudata). The monotypic Cyclestherida is more closely related to the Cladocera, both together forming the Cladoceromorpha. The Spinicaudata (Leptestheriidae, Limnadiidae, and Cyzicidae) is well supported. Spinicaudata and Cladoceromorpha form a monophylum. The position of the Laevicaudata remains unclear but we find neither support for a sister group relationship to the Spinicaudata nor for a close relationship of Laevicaudata and Cladocera. Within the Cladocera, we favour the Gymnomera concept with the monotypic Haplopoda being the sister group to the monophyletic Onychopoda. The Ctenopoda seems to be the sister group to the Gymnomera, which contradicts the common view of a more basal position of the Ctenopoda.
几十年来,鳃足纲(无甲目+叶足亚纲)内部的关系一直存在争议。对近祖性状或衍征性状状态的解释是一项艰巨的任务,尤其是在叶足亚纲中。我们在两个基因12S rDNA(线粒体)和EF1alpha(细胞核)的核苷酸比较水平上,以及基于在EF1alpha基因中发现的内含子的更高分子水平上,探索叶足亚纲内部的关系。在叶足亚纲中,我们的探索进一步证明了蚌形亚纲(棘尾蚌目+圆蚌目+光尾蚌目)并非单系类群。单型的圆蚌目与枝角亚目关系更为密切,二者共同构成枝角亚目形态类群。棘尾蚌目(薄皮蚌科、湖蚌科和蚌科)得到了充分支持。棘尾蚌目和枝角亚目形态类群形成一个单系类群。光尾蚌目的位置仍不清楚,但我们既没有找到支持其与棘尾蚌目为姐妹群关系的证据,也没有找到光尾蚌目与枝角亚目关系密切的证据。在枝角亚目内部,我们支持裸腹溞类概念,单型的单肢溞目是单系的端足溞目的姐妹群。栉足溞目似乎是裸腹溞类的姐妹群,这与栉足溞目处于更基部位置的普遍观点相矛盾。