Morgan-Miller N W
School of Family Studies and Human Services, Kansas State University, Manhattan 66506-1403, USA.
Psychol Rep. 2002 Oct;91(2):520-4; discussion 571-4. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2002.91.2.520.
Source documents for Islam and Christianity were analyzed for violent themes. The two religions both condemned criminal violence, and neither supported random violence. Nonviolence was more common in the Christian sources while active violence was much more common in the Islamic documents. Although violence themes are a very small proportion of the content of the documents of either religion, those who seek to justify active violence against perceived enemies may find more support for their actions in early Islamic sources than in early Christian sources. Results are interpreted from a perspective of symbolic interaction.
对伊斯兰教和基督教的原始文献进行了暴力主题分析。这两种宗教都谴责犯罪暴力，且都不支持随意暴力行为。非暴力在基督教文献中更为常见，而主动暴力行为在伊斯兰教文献中更为普遍。尽管暴力主题在这两种宗教文献的内容中所占比例都非常小，但那些试图为针对假想敌的主动暴力行为辩解的人可能会发现，早期伊斯兰教文献比早期基督教文献能为他们的行为提供更多支持。研究结果从符号互动的角度进行了解读。
