Hartley C Scott, Lazar Carmen, Wand Michael D, Lemieux Robert P
Department of Chemistry, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 3N6.
J Am Chem Soc. 2002 Nov 13;124(45):13513-8. doi: 10.1021/ja026458d.
The atropisomeric dopant 2,2',6,6'-tetramethyl-3,3'-dinitro-4,4'-bis[(4-nonyloxybenzoyl)oxy]biphenyl (1) induces a ferroelectric SmC phase when doped into the SmC liquid crystal hosts 2-(4-butyloxyphenyl)-5-octyloxypyrimidine (PhP1) and (+/-)-4-[(4-methylhexyl)oxy]phenyl 4-decyloxybenzoate (PhB). The propensity of dopant 1 to induce a spontaneous polarization (polarization power) is much higher in PhP1 than in PhB (1555 nC/cm(2) vs <35 nC/cm(2)), which is attributed to a greater propensity of 1 to undergo chirality transfer via core-core interactions with PhP1. In previous work, we postulated that a chiral perturbation exerted by 1 in PhP1 amplifies the polarization power of the dopant by causing a chiral distortion of the mean field potential (binding site) constraining the dopant in the SmC host, as described by the Chirality Transfer Feedback (CTF) model. To test the validity of the CTF model, and to provide a more direct assessment of the chiral perturbation exerted by dopant 1 on surrounding host molecules, we measured the effect of 1 on the polarization power of other chiral dopants acting as probes. In one series of experiments, (S,S)-5-(2,3-difluorooctyl)-2-(4-octylphenyl)pyridine (MDW950) and (S)-4-(1-methylheptyloxy)phenyl 4-decyloxybenzoate (4), which mimic the structures of PhP1 and PhB, were used as probes. In another series of experiments, the atropisomeric dopant 2,2',3,3',6,6'-hexamethyl-4,4'-bis[(4-nonyloxybenzoyl)oxy]biphenyl (2) was used as probe in PhP1. The results of the probe experiments suggest that dopant 1 exerts a much stronger chiral perturbation in PhP1 than in PhB. More significantly, the results of experiments using 2 as probe show that the chiral perturbation exerted by 1 can amplify the polarization power of another atropisomeric dopant, thus providing the first experimental evidence of the CTF effect.
阻转异构型掺杂剂2,2',6,6'-四甲基-3,3'-二硝基-4,4'-双[(4-壬氧基苯甲酰基)氧基]联苯(1)掺杂到SmC液晶主体2-(4-丁氧基苯基)-5-辛氧基嘧啶(PhP1)和(±)-4-[(4-甲基己基)氧基]苯基4-癸氧基苯甲酸酯(PhB)中时会诱导出铁电SmC相。掺杂剂1在PhP1中诱导自发极化(极化能力)的倾向远高于在PhB中(1555 nC/cm²对<35 nC/cm²),这归因于1通过与PhP1的核-核相互作用进行手性转移的倾向更大。在之前的工作中,我们推测1在PhP1中施加的手性微扰通过引起约束SmC主体中掺杂剂的平均场势(结合位点)的手性畸变来放大掺杂剂的极化能力,如手性转移反馈(CTF)模型所述。为了测试CTF模型的有效性,并更直接地评估掺杂剂1对周围主体分子施加的手性微扰,我们测量了1对用作探针的其他手性掺杂剂极化能力的影响。在一系列实验中,模拟PhP1和PhB结构的(S,S)-5-(2,3-二氟辛基)-2-(4-辛基苯基)吡啶(MDW950)和(S)-4-(1-甲基庚氧基)苯基4-癸氧基苯甲酸酯(4)被用作探针。在另一系列实验中,阻转异构型掺杂剂2,2',3,3',6,6'-六甲基-4,4'-双[(壬氧基苯甲酰基)氧基]联苯(2)在PhP1中用作探针。探针实验结果表明,掺杂剂在PhP1中施加的手性微扰比在PhB中强得多。更重要的是,使用2作为探针的实验结果表明,1施加的手性微扰可以放大另一种阻转异构型掺杂剂的极化能力,从而提供了CTF效应的首个实验证据。