• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

劳动分工的演变:通才、专才与任务分配

Evolving the division of labour: generalists, specialists and task allocation.

作者信息

Wahl L M

机构信息

Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, NJ, USA.

出版信息

J Theor Biol. 2002 Dec 7;219(3):371-88. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.2002.3133.

DOI:10.1006/jtbi.2002.3133
PMID:12419663
Abstract

The evolutionary dynamics of specialization, in the context of the division of labour, are investigated. Individuals associate in groups in which benefits are shared and costs borne individually; each individual is either a generalist who can perform all the necessary tasks, a specialist who performs a sub-set of the necessary tasks, or a parasite who contributes nothing to the group. The implications of the model are explored analytically and through both numerical and Monte Carlo methods. These methods demonstrate the evolution of populations towards stable arrangements of specialists and generalists. The fittest populations are those that divide tasks fairly and associate in large, highly specialized groups. Generalists have a distinct advantage in small groups, but the presence of generalists, ironically, lowers group fitness. Parasites are able to invade both specialized and non-specialized populations. A basic model for the continuous division of labour is also presented, demonstrating a tendency for populations to evolve increasingly unfair divisions of labour. This last result implies that an evolutionary ratchet favours disparity between the workload of specialist populations.

摘要

我们研究了分工背景下专业化的进化动态。个体以群体形式聚集,在群体中利益共享而成本各自承担;每个个体要么是能执行所有必要任务的通才,要么是执行部分必要任务的专才,要么是对群体毫无贡献的寄生虫。我们通过解析以及数值和蒙特卡罗方法来探究该模型的含义。这些方法证明了种群向专才和通才的稳定组合进化。最适应的种群是那些公平分配任务并在大型、高度专业化群体中聚集的种群。通才在小群体中有明显优势,但具有讽刺意味的是,通才的存在会降低群体适应性。寄生虫能够侵入专业化和非专业化种群。我们还提出了一个连续分工的基本模型,证明了种群有进化出越来越不公平分工的趋势。最后这个结果意味着一种进化棘轮效应有利于专家种群工作量之间的差异。

相似文献

1
Evolving the division of labour: generalists, specialists and task allocation.劳动分工的演变:通才、专才与任务分配
J Theor Biol. 2002 Dec 7;219(3):371-88. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.2002.3133.
2
Incomplete division of labor: error-prone multitaskers coexist with specialists.分工不完整:容易出错的多面手与专家并存。
J Theor Biol. 2008 Feb 7;250(3):449-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.09.040. Epub 2007 Oct 5.
3
Division of labour and the evolution of extreme specialization.分工和极端专业化的演变。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2018 Jul;2(7):1161-1167. doi: 10.1038/s41559-018-0564-9. Epub 2018 May 28.
4
Fitness costs of worker specialization for ant societies.蚂蚁社会中工蚁专业化的适应性代价。
Proc Biol Sci. 2016 Jan 13;283(1822). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.2572.
5
Specialized avian Haemosporida trade reduced host breadth for increased prevalence.专门的鸟类疟原虫通过减少宿主范围来提高流行率。
J Evol Biol. 2014 Nov;27(11):2520-8. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12514. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
6
Is specialization an evolutionary dead end? Testing for differences in speciation, extinction and trait transition rates across diverse phylogenies of specialists and generalists.专业化是进化的死胡同吗?检验 specialist 和 generalist 的不同系统发育中物种形成、灭绝和性状转变速率的差异。
J Evol Biol. 2016 Jun;29(6):1257-67. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12867. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
7
Task-switching costs promote the evolution of division of labor and shifts in individuality.任务转换成本促进了劳动分工和个性转变的进化。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Aug 21;109(34):13686-91. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1202233109. Epub 2012 Aug 7.
8
How Does Joint Evolution of Consumer Traits Affect Resource Specialization?消费者特征的共同进化如何影响资源专业化?
Am Nat. 2020 Feb;195(2):331-348. doi: 10.1086/706813. Epub 2019 Dec 26.
9
Fitness benefits and emergent division of labour at the onset of group living.群体生活开始时的健身益处和新兴分工。
Nature. 2018 Aug;560(7720):635-638. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0422-6. Epub 2018 Aug 22.
10
Parasite specialization in a unique habitat: hummingbirds as reservoirs of generalist blood parasites of Andean birds.独特栖息地中的寄生虫特化现象:蜂鸟作为安第斯鸟类常见血液寄生虫的宿主
J Anim Ecol. 2016 Sep;85(5):1234-45. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12550. Epub 2016 Jun 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Specialism and generalism in social animals in variable environments.多变环境中群居动物的专业化与非专业化
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025 Mar 20;380(1922):20230264. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0264.
2
When being flexible matters: Ecological underpinnings for the evolution of collective flexibility and task allocation.当灵活性至关重要时:集体灵活性和任务分配演变的生态基础。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 May 3;119(18):e2116066119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2116066119. Epub 2022 Apr 29.
3
The evolution of mechanisms to produce phenotypic heterogeneity in microorganisms.
微生物中产生表型异质性的机制的演变。
Nat Commun. 2022 Jan 25;13(1):195. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27902-4.
4
Leadership - not followership - determines performance in ant teams.领导力——而非随从力——决定了蚂蚁团队的表现。
Commun Biol. 2021 May 6;4(1):535. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02048-7.
5
Task syndromes: linking personality and task allocation in social animal groups.任务综合征:社会动物群体中个性与任务分配的关联
Behav Ecol. 2021 Feb 6;32(1):1-17. doi: 10.1093/beheco/araa083. eCollection 2021 Jan-Feb.
6
Evolutionary dynamics of complex multiple games.复杂多重博弈的进化动态。
Proc Biol Sci. 2019 Jun 26;286(1905):20190900. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2019.0900.
7
The Red Queen and King in finite populations.有限群体中的红皇后与红国王。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017 Jul 3;114(27):E5396-E5405. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1702020114. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
8
Heterogeneity of the Pancreatic Beta Cell.胰腺β细胞的异质性
Front Genet. 2017 Mar 6;8:22. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2017.00022. eCollection 2017.
9
The Mechanisms of Water Exchange: The Regulatory Roles of Multiple Interactions in Social Wasps.水交换的机制:多种相互作用在社会性黄蜂中的调节作用。
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 11;11(1):e0145560. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145560. eCollection 2016.
10
A role of stochastic phenotype switching in generating mosaic endothelial cell heterogeneity.随机表型转换在产生镶嵌内皮细胞异质性中的作用。
Nat Commun. 2016 Jan 8;7:10160. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10160.