• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

领导力——而非随从力——决定了蚂蚁团队的表现。

Leadership - not followership - determines performance in ant teams.

机构信息

Department of Ecology and Evolution, Biophore, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

Commun Biol. 2021 May 6;4(1):535. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02048-7.

DOI:10.1038/s42003-021-02048-7
PMID:33958713
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8102589/
Abstract

Economic theory predicts that organisations achieve higher levels of productivity when tasks are divided among different subsets of workers. This prediction is based upon the expectation that individuals should perform best when they specialise upon a few tasks. However, in colonies of social insects evidence for a causal link between division of labour and performance is equivocal. To address this issue, we performed a targeted worker removal experiment to disrupt the normal allocation of workers to a cooperative team task - tandem running. During a tandem run a knowledgeable leader communicates the location of a new nest to a follower by physically guiding her there. The targeted removal of prominent leaders significantly reduced tandem performance, whereas removal of prominent followers had no effect. Furthermore, analyses of the experience of both participants in each tandem run revealed that tandem performance was influenced primarily by how consistently the leader acted as a leader when the need arose, but not by the consistency of the follower. Our study shows that performance in ant teams depends largely on whether or not a key role is filled by an experienced individual, and suggests that in animal teams, not all roles are equally important.

摘要

经济理论预测,当任务分配给不同的工人子集时,组织会达到更高的生产力水平。这一预测基于这样的期望,即个人在专注于少数任务时应该表现得最好。然而,在社会性昆虫的群体中,劳动分工与绩效之间的因果关系的证据是模棱两可的。为了解决这个问题,我们进行了有针对性的工人移除实验,以破坏工人正常分配到合作团队任务——串列跑步的情况。在串列跑步中,一个有知识的领导者通过身体引导她到达新巢的位置,将新巢的位置传达给一个追随者。有针对性地移除杰出的领导者会显著降低串列的性能,而移除杰出的追随者则没有影响。此外,对每一次串列跑步中两位参与者的经验进行的分析表明,串列的性能主要受到领导者在需要时是否始终如一地发挥领导者作用的影响,而不是追随者的一致性的影响。我们的研究表明,蚂蚁团队的表现在很大程度上取决于一个关键角色是否由有经验的个体担任,这表明在动物团队中,并非所有角色都同等重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/218c/8102589/5b3ccacdfce6/42003_2021_2048_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/218c/8102589/b18a6dd15904/42003_2021_2048_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/218c/8102589/1001c87d70f5/42003_2021_2048_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/218c/8102589/05bed6beecc4/42003_2021_2048_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/218c/8102589/5b3ccacdfce6/42003_2021_2048_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/218c/8102589/b18a6dd15904/42003_2021_2048_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/218c/8102589/1001c87d70f5/42003_2021_2048_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/218c/8102589/05bed6beecc4/42003_2021_2048_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/218c/8102589/5b3ccacdfce6/42003_2021_2048_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Leadership - not followership - determines performance in ant teams.领导力——而非随从力——决定了蚂蚁团队的表现。
Commun Biol. 2021 May 6;4(1):535. doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02048-7.
2
Leadership and Followership in Military Interprofessional Health Care Teams.军事跨专业医疗保健团队中的领导力和追随力。
Mil Med. 2021 Oct 26;186(Suppl 3):7-15. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usab118.
3
Plasticity in leader-follower roles in human teams.人类团队中领导者-追随者角色的可塑性。
Sci Rep. 2017 Nov 6;7(1):14562. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-14851-6.
4
Trail laying during tandem-running recruitment in the ant Temnothorax albipennis.在白须蚁串联奔跑招募过程中的踪迹铺设
Naturwissenschaften. 2014 Jul;101(7):549-56. doi: 10.1007/s00114-014-1191-1. Epub 2014 Jun 6.
5
Key relocation leaders in an Indian queenless ant.印度无蚁王后蚁群中的关键迁移领导者。
Behav Processes. 2013 Jul;97:84-9. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2013.03.006. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
6
Landmarks and ant search strategies after interrupted tandem runs.中断串联运行后的地标与蚂蚁搜索策略。
J Exp Biol. 2014 Mar 15;217(Pt 6):944-54. doi: 10.1242/jeb.087296. Epub 2013 Nov 6.
7
Tandem Recruitment and Foraging in the Ponerine Ant Pachycondyla harpax (Fabricius).猛蚁类哈氏厚结猛蚁(法布里丘斯)的串联招募与觅食行为
Neotrop Entomol. 2018 Dec;47(6):742-749. doi: 10.1007/s13744-017-0571-6. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
8
Teaching with evaluation in ants.蚂蚁中的教学与评估
Curr Biol. 2007 Sep 4;17(17):1520-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.08.032.
9
Do ants need to be old and experienced to teach?蚂蚁需要年老有经验才能当老师吗?
J Exp Biol. 2012 Apr 15;215(Pt 8):1287-92. doi: 10.1242/jeb.064618.
10
Restricted antennal movement impacts the tandem running dynamics in a ponerine ant.触角活动受限会影响猛蚁亚科蚂蚁的串联行走动态。
BMC Ecol Evol. 2024 Jun 13;24(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12862-024-02267-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Targeted worker removal reveals a lack of flexibility in brood transport specialisation with no compensatory gain in efficiency.目标性的工蜂移除揭示了在蜂群幼虫运输专业化方面缺乏灵活性,并没有在效率上获得补偿性的提高。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 28;14(1):4850. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55244-w.
2
Functional and mechanistic diversity in ant tandem communication.蚂蚁串联通讯中的功能与机制多样性。
iScience. 2023 Mar 17;26(4):106418. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106418. eCollection 2023 Apr 21.
3
Information Theory Opens New Dimensions in Experimental Studies of Animal Behaviour and Communication.

本文引用的文献

1
The Role of Individual Heterogeneity in Collective Animal Behaviour.个体异质性在集体动物行为中的作用。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2020 Mar;35(3):278-291. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2019.11.001. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
2
Tandem-running and scouting behaviour are characterized by up-regulation of learning and memory formation genes within the ant brain.串跑和侦察行为的特点是蚂蚁大脑中学习和记忆形成基因的上调。
Mol Ecol. 2019 May;28(9):2342-2359. doi: 10.1111/mec.15079. Epub 2019 Apr 29.
3
Individual differences in learning and biogenic amine levels influence the behavioural division between foraging honeybee scouts and recruits.
信息论为动物行为与交流的实验研究开辟了新维度。
Animals (Basel). 2023 Mar 26;13(7):1174. doi: 10.3390/ani13071174.
4
Robotic communication with ants.与蚂蚁的机器人通信。
J Exp Biol. 2022 Aug 1;225(15). doi: 10.1242/jeb.244106. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
5
Tandem running by foraging workers in field conditions vary in response to food type, food distance, and environmental conditions.在野外条件下,觅食工蚁的串联奔跑会因食物类型、食物距离和环境条件而有所不同。
Curr Zool. 2021 Jun 26;67(5):541-549. doi: 10.1093/cz/zoab050. eCollection 2021 Oct.
学习和生物胺水平的个体差异影响觅食蜂侦察蜂和新兵之间的行为分工。
J Anim Ecol. 2019 Feb;88(2):236-246. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12911. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
4
Spatial fidelity of workers predicts collective response to disturbance in a social insect.工蚁的空间保真度预测了社会性昆虫对干扰的集体反应。
Nat Commun. 2018 Apr 3;9(1):1201. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03561-w.
5
The influence of the few: a stable 'oligarchy' controls information flow in house-hunting ants.少数派的影响:稳定的“寡头统治”控制着寻家蚂蚁的信息流。
Proc Biol Sci. 2018 Feb 14;285(1872). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.2726.
6
Consistent Individual Differences Drive Collective Behavior and Group Functioning of Schooling Fish.一致的个体差异驱动着有组织鱼类的集体行为和群体功能。
Curr Biol. 2017 Sep 25;27(18):2862-2868.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.08.004. Epub 2017 Sep 7.
7
Who needs 'lazy' workers? Inactive workers act as a 'reserve' labor force replacing active workers, but inactive workers are not replaced when they are removed.谁需要“懒惰”的工人?不活跃的工人充当替代活跃工人的“储备”劳动力,但不活跃的工人被移除时却不会被替代。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 6;12(9):e0184074. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184074. eCollection 2017.
8
Optimizing Music Learning: Exploring How Blocked and Interleaved Practice Schedules Affect Advanced Performance.优化音乐学习:探究集中练习和交错练习计划如何影响进阶表现。
Front Psychol. 2016 Aug 18;7:1251. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01251. eCollection 2016.
9
Sixteen years of change in the global terrestrial human footprint and implications for biodiversity conservation.全球陆地人类足迹 16 年来的变化及其对生物多样性保护的影响。
Nat Commun. 2016 Aug 23;7:12558. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12558.
10
Cooperative hunting roles among taï chimpanzees.塔伊黑猩猩之间的合作狩猎角色
Hum Nat. 2002 Mar;13(1):27-46. doi: 10.1007/s12110-002-1013-6.