临床疏忽中的专业护理标准。
The professional standard of care in clinical negligence.
作者信息
Tingle John
机构信息
Nottingham Law School, Nottingham Trent University.
出版信息
Br J Nurs. 2002;11(19):1267-9. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2002.11.19.10758.
Abstract
The general principle of law relating to breach of duty in the tort of negligence has been discussed during this series of articles. This article continues that discussion in relation to healthcare professionals such as nurses and doctors, and how the law affects their case. The issue of the expanded role of the nurse is also discussed.
摘要
在本系列文章中，已经讨论了与过失侵权中的失职相关的一般法律原则。本文将继续探讨该话题，涉及护士和医生等医疗专业人员，以及法律如何影响他们的情况。同时也会讨论护士角色扩展的问题。
相似文献
1
The professional standard of care in clinical negligence.临床疏忽中的专业护理标准。
Br J Nurs. 2002;11(19):1267-9. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2002.11.19.10758.
2
Establishing breach of the duty of care in the tort of negligence.在过失侵权行为中认定违反注意义务。
Br J Nurs. 2002;11(17):1128-30. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2002.11.17.1128.
3
Male nurses and the protection of female patient dignity.男护士与女性患者尊严的保护
Nurs Stand. 2010;25(13):42-9. doi: 10.7748/ns2010.12.25.13.42.c8121.
4
Right side of the law.法律的正确一方。
Nurs Times. 2003;99(24):22-6.
5
The Elements of a Nursing Malpractice Case, Part 1: Duty.护理医疗事故案例要素，第 1 部分：责任。
Am J Nurs. 2019 Jul;119(7):64-67. doi: 10.1097/01.NAJ.0000569476.17357.f5.
6
Learning from other nurses' mistakes.从其他护士的错误中吸取教训。
Nurs N Z. 2006 May;12(4):18.
7
Care of elderly people and nursing standards.老年人护理与护理标准。
Br J Nurs. 2002;11(3):154.
8
Collins on current issues: Legal consequences of unethical conduct.柯林斯论当前问题：不道德行为的法律后果。
Pa Nurse. 2007 Mar;62(1):5.
9
Who takes the blame?该怪谁？
Nurs Stand. 2005;19(33):28-9. doi: 10.7748/ns.19.33.28.s30.
10
Specialist nurses must understand clinical negligence litigation.专科护士必须了解临床过失诉讼。
Br J Nurs. 2001;10(11):716. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2001.10.11.10431.
Zotero 插件