Suppr超能文献

脉冲场凝胶电泳(PFGE)与两种不同聚合酶链反应(PCR)用于伯氏疏螺旋体狭义菌株物种鉴定的比较

Comparison of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and two different polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) for species identification of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato strains.

作者信息

Simenc Janez, Ruzić-Sabljić Eva, Strle Franc

机构信息

Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, Medical Faculty, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

出版信息

Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2002 Jul 31;114(13-14):551-6.

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to compare the findings of three different molecular-biological methods for Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato species identification: (i) large DNA fragments pattern obtained with Mlul restriction endonuclease and separated with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE); (ii) polymerase chain reaction (PCR), the region inside the 16S rRNA gene multiplied with species-specific primers; and (iii) PCR, the interspace region between the 5S and 23S rRNA genes amplified, the PCR product restricted with Msel restriction endonuclease and fragments separated in polyacrylamide gel. Forty-eight Borrelia strains isolated from diverse clinical materials and two tick strains were analyzed. Each of the 50 isolates analyzed by PFGE was found to be a single species: 30 B. afzelii, 14 B. garinii, and 6 B. burgdorferi sensu stricto. PCR amplification of 16S rRNA with species-specific primers revealed a single species in 41/50 samples and in nine samples two species were detected. PCR of the 5S-23S interspace region restricted with MseI restriction endonuclease detected a single species in 48/50 samples and a mixture of two species was found in 2/50 samples. In all cases where a single species was identified using PCR the species was in accordance with the PFGE result, and in all cases where a mixture of two species was identified by PCR one of the species was the same as that detected by PFGE. Using a criterion of complete concordance of the results a significant difference in species identification was found when PFGE and the 16S rRNA PCR were compared (p = 0.0026), but not between 5S-23S interspace PCR and PFGE (p = 0.4949) or between 16S rRNA and 5S-23S interspace PCRs (p = 0.0552). PCR assays were faster and easier to perform than PFGE for Borrelia species identification, however PFGE remains a standard procedure for analyzing isolates and demonstrating heterogeneity within species.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较三种不同分子生物学方法对伯氏疏螺旋体狭义种进行鉴定的结果

(i)用MluI限制性内切酶获得大DNA片段模式,并通过脉冲场凝胶电泳(PFGE)进行分离;(ii)聚合酶链反应(PCR),用种特异性引物扩增16S rRNA基因内部区域;(iii)PCR,扩增5S和23S rRNA基因之间的间隔区,PCR产物用MseI限制性内切酶进行酶切,并在聚丙烯酰胺凝胶中分离片段。对从不同临床材料中分离出的48株伯氏疏螺旋体菌株和2株蜱传菌株进行了分析。通过PFGE分析的50株分离株中的每一株都被发现是单一物种:30株阿氏疏螺旋体、14株伽氏疏螺旋体和6株狭义伯氏疏螺旋体。用种特异性引物对16S rRNA进行PCR扩增,在41/50个样本中检测到单一物种,在9个样本中检测到两种物种。用MseI限制性内切酶对5S - 23S间隔区进行PCR,在48/50个样本中检测到单一物种,在2/50个样本中发现两种物种的混合物。在所有使用PCR鉴定出单一物种的情况下,该物种与PFGE结果一致,在所有通过PCR鉴定出两种物种混合物的情况下,其中一种物种与PFGE检测到的物种相同。使用结果完全一致的标准,比较PFGE和16S rRNA PCR时,在物种鉴定上发现有显著差异(p = 0.0026),但在5S - 23S间隔区PCR与PFGE之间(p = 0.4949)或16S rRNA与5S - 23S间隔区PCR之间(p = 0.0552)未发现显著差异。对于伯氏疏螺旋体物种鉴定,PCR检测比PFGE更快且更容易操作,然而PFGE仍然是分析分离株和证明物种内异质性的标准方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验