Adams Hendrik, Scotti Pier A, Luirink Joen, Tommassen Jan
Department of Molecular Microbiology and Institute of Biomembranes, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
Eur J Biochem. 2002 Nov;269(22):5572-80. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2002.03263.x.
In the accompanying paper [Adams, H., Scotti, P.A., de Cock, H., Luirink, J. & Tommassen, J. (2002) Eur. J. Biochem.269, 5564-5571], we showed that the precursor of outer-membrane protein PhoE of Escherichia coli with a Gly to Leu substitution at position -10 in the signal sequence (G-10L) is targeted to the SecYEG translocon via the signal-recognition particle (SRP) route, instead of via the SecB pathway. Here, we studied the fate of the mutant precursor in a prlA4 mutant strain. prlA mutations, located in the secY gene, have been isolated as suppressors that restore the export of precursors with defective signal sequences. Remarkably, the G-10L mutant precursor, which is normally exported in a wild-type strain, accumulated strongly in a prlA4 mutant strain. In vitro cross-linking experiments revealed that the precursor is correctly targeted to the prlA4 mutant translocon. However, translocation across the cytoplasmic membrane was defective, as appeared from proteinase K-accessibility experiments in pulse-labeled cells. Furthermore, the mutant precursor was found to accumulate when expressed in a secY40 mutant, which is defective in the insertion of integral-membrane proteins but not in protein translocation. Together, these data suggest that SecB and SRP substrates are differently processed at the SecYEG translocon.
在随附论文[亚当斯,H.,斯科蒂,P.A.,德科克,H.,吕林克,J.和托马森,J.(2002年)《欧洲生物化学杂志》269,5564 - 5571]中,我们表明,大肠杆菌外膜蛋白PhoE的前体在信号序列第 - 10位有甘氨酸到亮氨酸的取代(G - 10L),它通过信号识别颗粒(SRP)途径靶向SecYEG转运体,而不是通过SecB途径。在此,我们研究了该突变体前体在prlA4突变株中的命运。位于secY基因中的prlA突变已被分离出来作为抑制子,可恢复信号序列有缺陷的前体的输出。值得注意的是,通常在野生型菌株中输出的G - 10L突变体前体在prlA4突变株中大量积累。体外交联实验表明,该前体被正确靶向prlA4突变体转运体。然而,从脉冲标记细胞中的蛋白酶K可及性实验来看,跨细胞质膜的转运存在缺陷。此外,当在secY40突变体中表达时发现该突变体前体积累,secY40突变体在整合膜蛋白的插入方面有缺陷,但在蛋白质转运方面无缺陷。总之,这些数据表明SecB和SRP底物在SecYEG转运体处的加工方式不同。