Suppr超能文献

评估大剂量阿糖胞苷治疗后两种延迟给予粒细胞集落刺激因子方案在成人急性淋巴细胞白血病患者中的前瞻性随机试验。

Prospective randomized trial to evaluate two delayed granulocyte colony stimulating factor administration schedules after high-dose cytarabine therapy in adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

作者信息

Hofmann W K, Seipelt G, Langenhan S, Reutzel R, Schott D, Schoeffski O, Illiger H J, Hartmann F, Balleisen L, Franke A, Fiedler F, Huber C, Rasche H, Bergmann L, Ganser A, Pott C, Pasold R, Rudolph C, Ottmann O G, Gökbuget N, Hoelzer D

机构信息

Department of Hematology and Oncology, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Hospital, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60596 Frankfurt/Main, Germany.

出版信息

Ann Hematol. 2002 Oct;81(10):570-4. doi: 10.1007/s00277-002-0542-8. Epub 2002 Oct 17.

Abstract

In acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), treatment with granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) during remission induction shortens granulocytopenia and may decrease morbidity due to infections. However, the optimal timing of G-CSF administration after chemotherapy is not known. In a prospective randomized multi-center study, adult ALL patients were treated with high-dose ARA-C [HDAC, 3 g/m(2) bid (1 g/m(2) bid for T-ALL) days 1-4] and mitoxantrone (MI 10 mg/m(2) days 3-5). They were randomized to receive recombinant human G-CSF (Lenograstim) 263 micro g/day SC starting either from day 12 (Group 1) or day 17 (Group 2). Fifty-five patients (41 male, 14 female) with a median age of 34 years (range: 18-55 years) were enrolled into the study; 50 patients were evaluable. The median duration of neutropenia <500/ micro l after HDAC/MI was 12 days (range: 7-22 days) in the early G-CSF Group 1 and also 12 days (range: 4-22 days) in the late G-CSF Group 2; this was shorter than in the historical control group (15 days, range: 4-43 days, n=46) where the patients received identical cytotoxic treatment without G-CSF. Seventeen infections were observed in 14 patients in Group 1 (47%) and 13 infections in 10 patients in Group 2 (50%) compared to 27 infections in 49 patients of the historical control (54%). In Group 1, the patients received a median of 11 injections with G-CSF (range: 7-22) compared to 7 injections (range: 4-19) in Group 2. The total administered dose of G-CSF in Group 2 was significantly reduced by 40% ( P<0.0001). The delayed start of G-CSF after HDAC/MI in ALL achieves the same clinical benefit compared to the earlier initiation of G-CSF. The reduction of treatment costs by reducing the total G-CSF dose may be important in future treatment with this hematopoietic growth factor.

摘要

在急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)中,缓解诱导期使用粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)进行治疗可缩短粒细胞缺乏期,并可能降低感染所致的发病率。然而,化疗后G-CSF给药的最佳时机尚不清楚。在一项前瞻性随机多中心研究中,成年ALL患者接受大剂量阿糖胞苷[HDAC,3 g/m²,每日2次(T-ALL为1 g/m²,每日2次),第1 - 4天]和米托蒽醌(MI 10 mg/m²,第3 - 5天)治疗。他们被随机分为两组,分别从第12天(第1组)或第17天(第2组)开始皮下注射重组人G-CSF(来格司亭)263 μg/天。55例患者(41例男性,14例女性),中位年龄34岁(范围:18 - 55岁)纳入研究;50例患者可评估。HDAC/MI治疗后,中性粒细胞计数<500/μl的中位持续时间在早期使用G-CSF的第1组为12天(范围:7 - 22天),在晚期使用G-CSF的第2组也是12天(范围:4 - 22天);这比历史对照组(15天,范围:4 - 43天,n = 46)短,历史对照组患者接受相同的细胞毒性治疗但未使用G-CSF。第1组14例患者中观察到17次感染(47%),第2组10例患者中观察到13次感染(50%),而历史对照组49例患者中有27次感染(54%)。第1组患者接受G-CSF注射的中位数为11次(范围:7 - 22次),第2组为7次(范围:4 - 19次)。第2组G-CSF的总给药剂量显著减少了40%(P<0.0001)。与更早开始使用G-CSF相比,ALL患者在HDAC/MI后延迟开始使用G-CSF可获得相同的临床益处。通过减少G-CSF总剂量来降低治疗成本在未来使用这种造血生长因子的治疗中可能很重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验