Erni Birgit, Liechti Felix, Bruderer Bruno
Swiss Ornithological Institute, CH-6204, Sempach, Switzerland.
J Theor Biol. 2002 Dec 21;219(4):479-93. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.2002.3138.
Long-distance bird migration consists of a series of stopovers (for refuelling) and flights, with flights taking little time compared to stopovers. Therefore, it has been hypothesized that birds minimize the total time taken for migration through efficient stopover behaviour. Current optimality models for stopover include (1) the fixed expectation rule and (2) the global update rule. These rules maximize the speed of migration by determining the optimal departure fuel load for a given fuel deposition rate. We were interested in simple behavioural rules approaching the stopover behaviour of real birds and how these rules compare to the time minimizing models above with respect to the total time taken for migration. The simple strategies were to stay at a site (1) until a fixed fuel load was reached or (2) for a constant number of days. We simulated migration of small nocturnal passerine birds across an environment of continuously distributed but variable fuel deposition rates, and investigated the influence of different stopover strategies on the duration of migration. Staying for a constant number of days at each stopover site, irrespective of the fuel deposition rate, resulted in only slightly longer than minimum values for migration duration. Additionally, the constant stopover duration, e.g. 10 days, may change by a day or two (per stopover) without having a large effect on total migration duration. There is therefore a possibility that real birds may be close to optimal migration speed without the need for very complex behaviour. When assessing the sensitivity of migration duration to factors other than stopover duration, we found that flight costs, search and settling time, mean fuel deposition rate and the accuracy in the choice of flight direction were the factors with the largest influence. Our results suggest that migrating birds can approximate optimal stopover duration relatively easy with a simple rule, and that other factors, e.g. those above, are more relevant for travel time.
长途鸟类迁徙由一系列中途停歇(用于补充能量)和飞行组成,与中途停歇相比,飞行时间较短。因此,有人提出假说,鸟类通过高效的中途停歇行为将迁徙所需的总时间减至最短。目前用于中途停歇的最优模型包括:(1)固定期望规则和(2)全局更新规则。这些规则通过确定给定能量沉积率下的最优出发能量负载来最大化迁徙速度。我们感兴趣的是接近真实鸟类中途停歇行为的简单行为规则,以及这些规则在迁徙总时间方面与上述时间最小化模型相比情况如何。简单策略是在一个地点停留:(1)直到达到固定的能量负载,或(2)停留固定天数。我们模拟了小型夜行性雀形目鸟类在能量沉积率连续分布但变化的环境中的迁徙,并研究了不同中途停歇策略对迁徙持续时间的影响。在每个中途停歇地点停留固定天数,无论能量沉积率如何,导致迁徙持续时间仅略长于最小值。此外,固定的中途停歇持续时间,例如10天,可能每次中途停歇会有一两天的变化,而对总迁徙持续时间没有太大影响。因此,真实鸟类有可能在不需要非常复杂行为的情况下接近最优迁徙速度。在评估迁徙持续时间对中途停歇持续时间以外的因素的敏感性时,我们发现飞行成本、搜索和停留时间、平均能量沉积率以及飞行方向选择的准确性是影响最大的因素。我们的结果表明,迁徙鸟类可以通过一个简单规则相对容易地接近最优中途停歇持续时间,并且其他因素,例如上述那些因素,对旅行时间更具相关性。