Coverage decisions versus the quality of care: an analysis of recent ERISA judicial decisions and their implications for employer-insured individuals.
作者信息
Rosenbaum S, Teitelbaum J
出版信息
Issue Brief George Wash Univ Cent Health Serv Res Policy. 2000 Apr(8):1-15.
PMID:12426709
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Coverage decisions versus the quality of care: an analysis of recent ERISA judicial decisions and their implications for employer-insured individuals.保险覆盖范围决策与医疗质量：对近期《雇员退休收入保障法》司法判决及其对雇主参保个人影响的分析。
Issue Brief George Wash Univ Cent Health Serv Res Policy. 2000 Apr(8):1-15.
2
The Supreme Court's limitation of managed-care liability.最高法院对管理式医疗责任的限制。
N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 23;351(13):1347-52. doi: 10.1056/NEJMlim042143.
3
The secret life of the dominant form of managed care: self-insured ERISA networks.管理式医疗主导形式的隐秘生活：自我保险的《雇员退休收入保障法》网络。
Health Matrix Clevel. 1996 Summer;6(2):305-48.
4
ERISA update: the Supreme Court Texas decision and other recent developments.《雇员退休收入保障法》更新：美国最高法院对得克萨斯州的裁决及其他近期动态
State Coverage Initiat Issue Brief. 2004 Aug;5(2):1-7.
5
A practical guide to preemption for self-insured plans.自保计划的先买权实用指南。
Benefits Q. 1998;14(2):39-41.
6
What is an employee benefit plan?: ERISA preemption of "any willing provider" laws after Pegram.什么是员工福利计划？：佩格拉姆案后《雇员退休收入保障法》对“任何愿意提供服务的供应商”法律的优先适用
Columbia Law Rev. 2001 Jun;101(5):1107-39.
7
Recent developments in employee benefits law.
Tort Trial Insur Pract Law J. 2005 Winter;40(2):345-68.
8
Back to the '90s--the Supreme Court immunizes managed care.
N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 23;351(13):1277-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp048196.
9
Marketplace. New U.S. appeals court ruling opens wide holes in ERISA preemption.市场动态。美国上诉法院的一项新裁决在《雇员退休收入保障法》（ERISA）的优先适用方面撕开了大口子。
Med Health. 1998 Jul 13;52(28):suppl 1-2.
10
The circuitous journey to the Patients' Bill of Rights: winners and losers.
Albany Law Rev. 2000;65(1):17-95.
Zotero 插件