• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

牙外伤夹板的舒适度与不舒适度——一种新型装置(TTS)与三种常用夹板固定技术的比较

Comfort and discomfort of dental trauma splints - a comparison of a new device (TTS) with three commonly used splinting techniques.

作者信息

Filippi Andreas, von Arx Thomas, Lussi Adrian

机构信息

Department of Oral Surgery, Oral Radiology and Oral Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Dent Traumatol. 2002 Oct;18(5):275-80. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-9657.2002.00121.x.

DOI:10.1034/j.1600-9657.2002.00121.x
PMID:12427202
Abstract

The present experimental study compared four dental trauma splints in 10 volunteers. The evaluated splints included a wire-composite splint (WCS), a button-bracket splint (BS), a resin splint (RS), and the newly developed titanium trauma splint (TTS). All splints were bonded to the labial surfaces of the maxillary lateral and central incisors and left in place for 1 week. After splint removal, the next splint was placed after a 1-week rest period. The sequence of splint application was randomized for each individual. The following subjective parameters were assessed using a visual analogue scale: sensitiveness of splinted teeth, irritation of the gingival margin, irritation of the lips, impairment of speech, eating and oral hygiene. The results show that the application of BS leads to a significantly higher irritation of the lips and greater impairment of speech compared to other splints (P < 0.05). The RS leads to an increased and significantly higher irritation of the gingiva (P < 0.05) owing to a significant increase in cleaning difficulties (P < 0.05). In conclusion, WCS and TTS appear to be more accepted splints according to a subjective assessment by 10 volunteers.

摘要

本实验研究比较了10名志愿者使用的四种牙外伤夹板。评估的夹板包括钢丝复合夹板(WCS)、纽扣-托槽夹板(BS)、树脂夹板(RS)和新开发的钛制外伤夹板(TTS)。所有夹板均粘结在上颌侧切牙和中切牙的唇面,并保留1周。取下夹板后,休息1周再放置下一种夹板。每种夹板的应用顺序对每个个体都是随机的。使用视觉模拟量表评估以下主观参数:夹板固定牙齿的敏感度、牙龈边缘的刺激、嘴唇的刺激、言语障碍、进食和口腔卫生。结果表明,与其他夹板相比,使用BS会导致嘴唇受到明显更高的刺激,言语障碍也更严重(P < 0.05)。由于清洁困难显著增加(P < 0.05),RS会导致牙龈刺激增加且明显更高(P < 0.05)。总之,根据10名志愿者的主观评估,WCS和TTS似乎是更易被接受的夹板。

相似文献

1
Comfort and discomfort of dental trauma splints - a comparison of a new device (TTS) with three commonly used splinting techniques.牙外伤夹板的舒适度与不舒适度——一种新型装置(TTS)与三种常用夹板固定技术的比较
Dent Traumatol. 2002 Oct;18(5):275-80. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-9657.2002.00121.x.
2
Comparison of a new dental trauma splint device (TTS) with three commonly used splinting techniques.一种新型牙外伤夹板装置(TTS)与三种常用夹板固定技术的比较。
Dent Traumatol. 2001 Dec;17(6):266-74. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-9657.2001.170605.x.
3
Laboratory comparison of a titanium trauma splint with three conventional ones for the treatment of dental trauma.用于治疗牙外伤的钛制创伤夹板与三种传统夹板的实验室比较。
Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2005 Dec;6(4):191-6.
4
In vitro comparison of the flexibility of different splint systems used in dental traumatology.在牙科外伤学中使用的不同夹板系统的柔韧性的体外比较。
Dent Traumatol. 2010 Feb;26(1):30-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2009.00843.x.
5
Rigidity of commonly used dental trauma splints.常用牙外伤夹板的刚性。
Dent Traumatol. 2009 Jun;25(3):248-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2008.00683.x.
6
Splinting of traumatized teeth with focus on adhesive techniques.聚焦于粘结技术的外伤牙夹板固定术
J Calif Dent Assoc. 2005 May;33(5):409-14.
7
Splinting of traumatized teeth with a new device: TTS (Titanium Trauma Splint).使用一种新装置——TTS(钛制创伤夹板)对创伤牙进行夹板固定。
Dent Traumatol. 2001 Aug;17(4):180-4. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-9657.2001.170408.x.
8
Biomechanical effects of splint types on traumatized tooth: a photoelastic stress analysis.夹板类型对创伤牙的生物力学影响:光弹性应力分析
Dent Traumatol. 2006 Jun;22(3):133-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2006.00339.x.
9
Establishment of experimental models to evaluate the effectiveness of dental trauma splints.建立用于评估牙外伤夹板有效性的实验模型。
Dent Mater J. 2017 Nov 29;36(6):731-739. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2016-333. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
10
Influence of adhesive point dimension and splint type on splint rigidity--evaluation by the dynamic Periotest method.黏着点尺寸和夹板类型对夹板刚性的影响--通过动态牙周测试法评估。
Dent Traumatol. 2013 Jun;29(3):203-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.2012.01164.x. Epub 2012 Jul 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Dental trauma simulation training using four splinting models: A cross sectional study.使用四种固定模型进行牙外伤模拟训练:一项横断面研究。
Dent Traumatol. 2022 Dec;38(6):519-525. doi: 10.1111/edt.12772. Epub 2022 Jun 26.
2
Glass Fiber Reinforced Composite Orthodontic Retainer: In Vitro Effect of Tooth Brushing on the Surface Wear and Mechanical Properties.玻璃纤维增强复合正畸保持器:刷牙对其表面磨损和力学性能的体外影响
Materials (Basel). 2020 Feb 25;13(5):1028. doi: 10.3390/ma13051028.
3
Interventions for treating traumatised permanent front teeth: avulsed (knocked out) and replanted.
治疗外伤性恒前牙的干预措施:牙脱位(脱落)并再植。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Feb 5;2(2):CD006542. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006542.pub3.
4
Interventions for treating traumatised permanent front teeth: luxated (dislodged) teeth.治疗外伤性恒前牙的干预措施:牙齿松动(移位)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Apr 30;2013(4):CD006203. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006203.pub2.
5
The use of bone wax for protection from sharp ends of interdental wires.使用骨蜡保护免受牙间钢丝尖锐末端的伤害。
Indian J Plast Surg. 2011 Jan;44(1):160. doi: 10.4103/0970-0358.81462.