Filippi Andreas, von Arx Thomas, Lussi Adrian
Department of Oral Surgery, Oral Radiology and Oral Medicine, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Dent Traumatol. 2002 Oct;18(5):275-80. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-9657.2002.00121.x.
The present experimental study compared four dental trauma splints in 10 volunteers. The evaluated splints included a wire-composite splint (WCS), a button-bracket splint (BS), a resin splint (RS), and the newly developed titanium trauma splint (TTS). All splints were bonded to the labial surfaces of the maxillary lateral and central incisors and left in place for 1 week. After splint removal, the next splint was placed after a 1-week rest period. The sequence of splint application was randomized for each individual. The following subjective parameters were assessed using a visual analogue scale: sensitiveness of splinted teeth, irritation of the gingival margin, irritation of the lips, impairment of speech, eating and oral hygiene. The results show that the application of BS leads to a significantly higher irritation of the lips and greater impairment of speech compared to other splints (P < 0.05). The RS leads to an increased and significantly higher irritation of the gingiva (P < 0.05) owing to a significant increase in cleaning difficulties (P < 0.05). In conclusion, WCS and TTS appear to be more accepted splints according to a subjective assessment by 10 volunteers.
本实验研究比较了10名志愿者使用的四种牙外伤夹板。评估的夹板包括钢丝复合夹板(WCS)、纽扣-托槽夹板(BS)、树脂夹板(RS)和新开发的钛制外伤夹板(TTS)。所有夹板均粘结在上颌侧切牙和中切牙的唇面,并保留1周。取下夹板后,休息1周再放置下一种夹板。每种夹板的应用顺序对每个个体都是随机的。使用视觉模拟量表评估以下主观参数:夹板固定牙齿的敏感度、牙龈边缘的刺激、嘴唇的刺激、言语障碍、进食和口腔卫生。结果表明,与其他夹板相比,使用BS会导致嘴唇受到明显更高的刺激,言语障碍也更严重(P < 0.05)。由于清洁困难显著增加(P < 0.05),RS会导致牙龈刺激增加且明显更高(P < 0.05)。总之,根据10名志愿者的主观评估,WCS和TTS似乎是更易被接受的夹板。