Suppr超能文献

急性脑损伤研究中的同意书豁免

Waiver of consent in studies of acute brain injury.

作者信息

Clifton Guy L, Knudson Paula, McDonald Marilyn

机构信息

Vivian L. Smith Center for Neurologic Research, The University of Texas Medical School at Houston, USA.

出版信息

J Neurotrauma. 2002 Oct;19(10):1121-6. doi: 10.1089/08977150260337930.

Abstract

A multicenter trial of hypothermia in patients with acute brain injury, designed to accrue 140 patients per year and randomizing in less than 6 h from injury, enrolled 392 patients. The design was to achieve 33 degrees C within 8 h after injury. For the first 9 months of the trial, the only consent mechanism permitted by federal regulations was prospective, informed consent. In the subsequent 33 months, after a change in federal regulations, waiver of consent could be used when family could not be located. Waiver of consent was used in 62% of patients enrolled. In the first 9 months of the trial, accrual was 65 patients. In the subsequent 3 years, an average yearly accrual was 127 patients. In the first 9 months, time from injury to randomization was 4.5 +/- 1.2 h; time to achievement of target temperature was 11.7 +/- 2.6 h. In years when waiver of consent was permitted, randomization time was 4.1 +/- 1.1 h, and time to target temperature was 7.9 +/- 2.7 h. For all years of the study, waiver of consent was used for 53% of minorities, 47% of unskilled workers, 33% of nonminorities, and 29% of skilled or professional workers. Minorities were underrepresented by 30% in the first 9 months of the study. We conclude that it is impracticable and unjust to perform studies of acute brain injury without use of waiver of consent when the treatment window is less than 6 h.

摘要

一项针对急性脑损伤患者的低温治疗多中心试验,计划每年招募140名患者,并在受伤后不到6小时内进行随机分组,最终招募了392名患者。该试验的设计目标是在受伤后8小时内将体温降至33摄氏度。在试验的前9个月,联邦法规允许的唯一同意机制是前瞻性的知情同意。在随后的33个月里,联邦法规发生了变化,当无法找到患者家属时,可以使用同意豁免。在招募的患者中,62%使用了同意豁免。在试验的前9个月,招募了65名患者。在随后的3年里,平均每年招募127名患者。在前9个月,从受伤到随机分组的时间为4.5±1.2小时;达到目标体温的时间为11.7±2.6小时。在允许使用同意豁免的年份,随机分组时间为4.1±1.1小时,达到目标体温的时间为7.9±2.7小时。在整个研究期间,同意豁免在53%的少数族裔、47%的非技术工人、33%的非少数族裔以及29%的技术或专业工人中使用。在研究的前9个月,少数族裔的代表性不足30%。我们得出结论,当治疗窗口小于6小时时,在急性脑损伤研究中不使用同意豁免是不切实际且不公正的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验