• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急性脑损伤研究中的同意书豁免

Waiver of consent in studies of acute brain injury.

作者信息

Clifton Guy L, Knudson Paula, McDonald Marilyn

机构信息

Vivian L. Smith Center for Neurologic Research, The University of Texas Medical School at Houston, USA.

出版信息

J Neurotrauma. 2002 Oct;19(10):1121-6. doi: 10.1089/08977150260337930.

DOI:10.1089/08977150260337930
PMID:12427322
Abstract

A multicenter trial of hypothermia in patients with acute brain injury, designed to accrue 140 patients per year and randomizing in less than 6 h from injury, enrolled 392 patients. The design was to achieve 33 degrees C within 8 h after injury. For the first 9 months of the trial, the only consent mechanism permitted by federal regulations was prospective, informed consent. In the subsequent 33 months, after a change in federal regulations, waiver of consent could be used when family could not be located. Waiver of consent was used in 62% of patients enrolled. In the first 9 months of the trial, accrual was 65 patients. In the subsequent 3 years, an average yearly accrual was 127 patients. In the first 9 months, time from injury to randomization was 4.5 +/- 1.2 h; time to achievement of target temperature was 11.7 +/- 2.6 h. In years when waiver of consent was permitted, randomization time was 4.1 +/- 1.1 h, and time to target temperature was 7.9 +/- 2.7 h. For all years of the study, waiver of consent was used for 53% of minorities, 47% of unskilled workers, 33% of nonminorities, and 29% of skilled or professional workers. Minorities were underrepresented by 30% in the first 9 months of the study. We conclude that it is impracticable and unjust to perform studies of acute brain injury without use of waiver of consent when the treatment window is less than 6 h.

摘要

一项针对急性脑损伤患者的低温治疗多中心试验,计划每年招募140名患者,并在受伤后不到6小时内进行随机分组,最终招募了392名患者。该试验的设计目标是在受伤后8小时内将体温降至33摄氏度。在试验的前9个月,联邦法规允许的唯一同意机制是前瞻性的知情同意。在随后的33个月里,联邦法规发生了变化,当无法找到患者家属时,可以使用同意豁免。在招募的患者中,62%使用了同意豁免。在试验的前9个月,招募了65名患者。在随后的3年里,平均每年招募127名患者。在前9个月,从受伤到随机分组的时间为4.5±1.2小时;达到目标体温的时间为11.7±2.6小时。在允许使用同意豁免的年份,随机分组时间为4.1±1.1小时,达到目标体温的时间为7.9±2.7小时。在整个研究期间,同意豁免在53%的少数族裔、47%的非技术工人、33%的非少数族裔以及29%的技术或专业工人中使用。在研究的前9个月,少数族裔的代表性不足30%。我们得出结论,当治疗窗口小于6小时时,在急性脑损伤研究中不使用同意豁免是不切实际且不公正的。

相似文献

1
Waiver of consent in studies of acute brain injury.急性脑损伤研究中的同意书豁免
J Neurotrauma. 2002 Oct;19(10):1121-6. doi: 10.1089/08977150260337930.
2
Multicenter trial of early hypothermia in severe brain injury.严重脑损伤早期低温治疗的多中心试验。
J Neurotrauma. 2009 Mar;26(3):393-7. doi: 10.1089/neu.2008.0556.
3
Lack of effect of induction of hypothermia after acute brain injury.急性脑损伤后低温诱导无效。
N Engl J Med. 2001 Feb 22;344(8):556-63. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200102223440803.
4
Intercenter variance in clinical trials of head trauma--experience of the National Acute Brain Injury Study: Hypothermia.头部创伤临床试验中的中心间差异——国家急性脑损伤研究:低温治疗的经验
J Neurosurg. 2001 Nov;95(5):751-5. doi: 10.3171/jns.2001.95.5.0751.
5
Hypothermia pediatric head injury trial: the value of a pretrial clinical evaluation phase.低温治疗小儿颅脑损伤试验:审前临床评估阶段的价值
Dev Neurosci. 2006;28(4-5):291-301. doi: 10.1159/000094155.
6
Hypothermia for Traumatic Brain Injury in Children-A Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial.儿童创伤性脑损伤的低温治疗——一项 II 期随机对照试验。
Crit Care Med. 2015 Jul;43(7):1458-66. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000947.
7
Finding family for prospective consent in emergency research.在紧急情况下的研究中寻找家属以获取前瞻性同意。
Clin Trials. 2007;4(6):631-7. doi: 10.1177/1740774507084977.
8
Rationale, methodology, and implementation of a nationwide multicenter randomized controlled trial of long-term mild hypothermia for severe traumatic brain injury (the LTH-1 trial).重度创伤性脑损伤长期轻度低温治疗全国多中心随机对照试验(LTH-1试验)的原理、方法及实施
Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Jan;40:9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2014.11.008. Epub 2014 Nov 12.
9
Minimal-risk waiver of informed consent and exception from informed consent (Final Rule) studies at institutional review boards nationwide.全国各机构审查委员会对知情同意的最小风险豁免和知情同意例外情况(最终规则)研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Nov;12(11):1134-7. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.06.011.
10
Ethical considerations on consent procedures for emergency research in severe and moderate traumatic brain injury.关于重度和中度创伤性脑损伤紧急研究同意程序的伦理考量
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2005 Jun;147(6):633-9; discussion 639-40. doi: 10.1007/s00701-005-0525-3. Epub 2005 Apr 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Unlocking therapeutic potential in traumatic brain injury: exploring microenvironmental targets, signaling pathways and translational hurdles.挖掘创伤性脑损伤的治疗潜力:探索微环境靶点、信号通路及转化障碍
Inflammopharmacology. 2025 Sep;33(9):5113-5144. doi: 10.1007/s10787-025-01923-7. Epub 2025 Sep 1.
2
Equity in Clinical Care and Research Involving Persons with Disorders of Consciousness.涉及意识障碍患者的临床护理和研究中的公平性。
Neurocrit Care. 2024 Oct;41(2):345-356. doi: 10.1007/s12028-024-02012-3. Epub 2024 Jun 13.
3
When is it impractical to ask informed consent? A systematic review.
在什么情况下征求知情同意不切实际?系统评价。
Clin Trials. 2022 Oct;19(5):545-560. doi: 10.1177/17407745221103567. Epub 2022 Jul 1.
4
Exploring the inclusion of under-served groups in trials methodology research: an example from ethnic minority populations' views on deferred consent.探讨将服务不足群体纳入试验方法学研究中:以少数民族群体对延迟同意的看法为例。
Trials. 2021 Sep 3;22(1):589. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05568-z.
5
Informed consent in critically ill adults participating to a randomized trial.重症成人参与随机试验的知情同意书。
Brain Behav. 2021 Feb;11(2):e01965. doi: 10.1002/brb3.1965. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
6
Exploring the experiences of substitute decision-makers with an exception to consent in a paediatric resuscitation randomised controlled trial: study protocol for a qualitative research study.探讨在儿科复苏随机对照试验中,对同意的例外情况下替代决策人的体验:一项定性研究的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2016 Sep 13;6(9):e012931. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012931.
7
Exceptions to the rule of informed consent for research with an intervention.针对有干预措施的研究的知情同意规则的例外情况。
BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Feb 6;17:9. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0092-6.
8
Deferred consent in a minimal-risk study involving critically ill subarachnoid hemorrhage patients.在一项涉及重症蛛网膜下腔出血患者的低风险研究中采用延迟同意。
Can Respir J. 2014 Sep-Oct;21(5):293-6. doi: 10.1155/2014/719270. Epub 2014 Jun 10.
9
Enrollment of racially/ethnically diverse participants in traumatic brain injury trials: effect of availability of exception from informed consent.创伤性脑损伤试验中不同种族/民族参与者的入组:知情同意豁免的可及性的影响。
Clin Trials. 2014 Apr;11(2):187-94. doi: 10.1177/1740774514522560.
10
Is the enrollment of racial and ethnic minorities in research in the emergency setting equitable?在紧急情况下,少数种族和族裔群体参与研究的情况是否公平?
Resuscitation. 2009 Jun;80(6):644-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.03.015. Epub 2009 Apr 22.