Suppr超能文献

进一步的证据表明,一条共享的传出丘系通路驱动着用于平稳眼动和扫视的独立神经回路。

Further evidence that a shared efferent collicular pathway drives separate circuits for smooth eye movements and saccades.

作者信息

Missal M, Coimbra A, Lefèvre P, Olivier E

机构信息

Laboratory of Neurophysiology, School of Medicine, Université Catholique de Louvain, 5449 Ave Hippocrate, 1200 Brussels, Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Exp Brain Res. 2002 Dec;147(3):344-52. doi: 10.1007/s00221-002-1274-7. Epub 2002 Oct 10.

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to find out whether smooth eye movements (SEMs) evoked by superior colliculus (SC) stimulation are, as suggested by Breznen et al. (1996), artefactual eye movements resulting from a non-physiological response of the saccadic generator. This question was reinvestigated in head-restrained cats. Long-lasting SC stimulation was found to evoke, in a comparable proportion, either a single saccade followed by an uninterrupted SEM or a staircase of two or three saccades interleaved with SEMs. These two different patterns of eye movements could be elicited at a near-threshold current and at low stimulation frequencies. In most cases, SEM direction clearly differed from that of the preceding saccade. This difference between SEM and saccade directions varied in a systematic way as a function of the initial saccade direction. As demonstrated by computer simulation, this observation can be explained if the neural circuit controlling SEMs reaches a saturation level earlier than the saccadic burst-generator. Our results in cats were reminiscent of those reported by Breznen et al. (1996) in the monkey only in some instances, when high frequency stimulation (400-600 Hz) was applied. Indeed, in the case of near-threshold stimulation-elicited staircase saccades, increasing the stimulation frequency led to a progressive disappearance of the smaller subsequent saccades that were substituted by uninterrupted SEM-like movements. Altogether, the present results confirm the view that SEMs are genuine eye movements. These results rule out the hypothesis that SEMs result from a saturation of the saccadic generator and strengthen the hypothesis that SEMs and saccades are distinct movements. We suggest that the same collicular efferent cells carry out the motor command to saccadic and SEM circuits and that the position error originating from the SC may be distributed amongst separate downstream motor systems.

摘要

本研究的目的是确定上丘(SC)刺激诱发的平滑眼动(SEM)是否如Breznen等人(1996年)所暗示的那样,是由扫视发生器的非生理反应导致的人为眼动。在头部固定的猫身上重新研究了这个问题。发现长时间的SC刺激能以相当的比例诱发以下两种情况:要么是单个扫视后接着不间断的SEM,要么是由两个或三个扫视与SEM交替组成的阶梯状眼动。这两种不同的眼动模式可以在接近阈值的电流和低刺激频率下诱发。在大多数情况下,SEM的方向明显不同于前一个扫视的方向。SEM和扫视方向之间的这种差异会随着初始扫视方向而系统地变化。计算机模拟表明,如果控制SEM的神经回路比扫视爆发发生器更早达到饱和水平,就可以解释这一观察结果。我们在猫身上得到的结果仅在某些情况下让人想起Breznen等人(1996年)在猴子身上报道的结果,即当施加高频刺激(400 - 600Hz)时。实际上,在接近阈值刺激诱发的阶梯状扫视的情况下,增加刺激频率会导致后续较小的扫视逐渐消失,取而代之的是不间断的类似SEM的运动。总之,目前的结果证实了SEM是真正的眼动这一观点。这些结果排除了SEM是由扫视发生器饱和导致的假说,并强化了SEM和扫视是不同运动的假说。我们认为,同一组丘传出细胞对扫视和SEM回路执行运动指令,并且源自SC的位置误差可能分布在不同的下游运动系统中。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验