Purcell P J
Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress, Washington, D.C., USA.
Soc Secur Bull. 2001;64(2):92-102.
Employment sector and employer size account for substantial variation in workers' participation in employer-sponsored retirement plans. Other things being equal, employees in the public sector--that is, federal, state, and local governments--are much more likely to be offered a retirement plan than workers in the private sector. Within the private sector, workers in firms with 100 or more employees are significantly more likely than workers in smaller firms to have the opportunity to participate in a retirement plan. This situation has prompted Congress to seek ways of reducing small businesses' obstacles to pension coverage. For example, Congress has authorized retirement plans that have fewer reporting requirements and less stringent contribution rules than those imposed on larger employers. Evaluating the effect of these laws on pension coverage is complicated by the many other variables that affect an employer's decision to sponsor a retirement plan and a worker's decision to participate in it. Nevertheless, data collected in national surveys of employers and households can be used to establish a baseline against which future changes in retirement plan sponsorship and participation can be measured. Recent surveys of employers and households reveal that: During the 1990s, participation in retirement plans rose among workers in firms with fewer than 100 employees but remained steady among workers in larger firms. The 1990s saw a substantial shift from defined benefit retirement plans to defined contribution plans. Despite increases in participation, workers in firms with fewer than 100 employees are only about half as likely as those in larger firms to participate in an employer-sponsored retirement plan. In both the public and private sectors, part-year or part-time workers are much less likely than year-round, full-time workers to be offered an opportunity to participate in an employer-sponsored retirement plan.
就业部门和雇主规模在工人参与雇主赞助的退休计划方面存在很大差异。在其他条件相同的情况下,公共部门(即联邦、州和地方政府)的员工比私营部门的员工更有可能获得退休计划。在私营部门中,拥有100名或更多员工的公司的工人比小公司的工人有更大机会参与退休计划的可能性要大得多。这种情况促使国会寻求减少小企业养老金覆盖障碍的方法。例如,国会已批准了一些退休计划,这些计划的报告要求和缴费规定比适用于大型雇主的规定更少、更宽松。评估这些法律对养老金覆盖的影响因许多其他变量而变得复杂,这些变量会影响雇主赞助退休计划的决定以及工人参与该计划的决定。尽管如此,在全国雇主和家庭调查中收集的数据可用于建立一个基线,据此可以衡量退休计划赞助和参与情况的未来变化。最近对雇主和家庭的调查显示:在20世纪90年代,员工少于100人的公司的工人参与退休计划的比例有所上升,但大公司的工人参与率保持稳定。20世纪90年代,从固定收益退休计划到固定缴款计划发生了重大转变。尽管参与率有所提高,但员工少于100人的公司的工人参与雇主赞助的退休计划的可能性仅为大公司工人的一半左右。在公共和私营部门,非全年或兼职员工比全年全职员工获得参与雇主赞助退休计划机会的可能性要小得多。