Rose Susan A, Feldman Judith F, Jankowski Jeffery J
Department of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Children's Hospital at Montefiore, Bronx, New York 10461, USA.
Dev Psychol. 2002 Nov;38(6):895-902. doi: 10.1037//0012-1649.38.6.895.
Processing speed was assessed at 5, 7, and 12 months in full-term and preterm infants (birth-weight < 1,750 g). Speed was gauged directly in a new task by presenting infants with a series of paired faces, one that remained the same across trials and one that changed; trials continued until infants showed a consistent novelty preference. At all ages, preterms required about 20% more trials and 30% more time than full-terms to reach criterion. Among preterms, slower processing was associated with greater medical risk (e.g., respiratory distress syndrome). Developmental trajectories for speed (and attention) were similar for both groups. Thus, the deficits in processing speed previously found for preterms in childhood are already present in the 1st year of life.
对足月儿和早产儿(出生体重<1750克)在5个月、7个月和12个月时的处理速度进行了评估。通过向婴儿呈现一系列配对的面孔来直接衡量速度,其中一张面孔在各试验中保持不变,另一张面孔会发生变化;试验持续进行,直到婴儿表现出一致的新奇偏好。在所有年龄段,早产儿达到标准所需的试验次数比足月儿多约20%,时间多约30%。在早产儿中,处理速度较慢与更高的医疗风险(如呼吸窘迫综合征)相关。两组的速度(和注意力)发育轨迹相似。因此,先前在儿童期发现的早产儿处理速度缺陷在生命的第一年就已存在。