• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对疑似阑尾炎的评分与诊断性腹腔镜检查

Scoring and diagnostic laparoscopy for suspected appendicitis.

作者信息

van den Broek Wim T, Bijnen Bart B, Rijbroek Bram, Gouma Dirk J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Medical Centre Alkmaar, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Surg. 2002;168(6):349-54. doi: 10.1080/11024150260284860.

DOI:10.1080/11024150260284860
PMID:12428873
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop a reproducible scoring system to identify patients who present with a doubtful diagnosis of appendicitis and who would benefit from diagnostic laparoscopy.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

SETTING

Regional teaching hospital, The Netherlands.

SUBJECTS

577 consecutive patients during the period 1994-5, and 343 who presented during the period 1996-7.

INTERVENTIONS

The variables that seemed to be predictive of acute appendicitis were abstracted from the earlier group. a logistic regression analysis applied, and score created. The score was validated on the 343 patients who presented during 1996-7, and then the groups were combined for further analysis.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Reproducibility of the scoring system obtained by comparing odds ratios (OR) of the two groups; its effectiveness judged by comparing the delayed and normal appendicectomy rates.

RESULTS

The following variables were significantly correlated with the presence of acute appendicitis: white cell count 10 x 10(9)/L or more (score 3), rebound tenderness and male sex (score 2 each); and symptoms present for < 48 hrs and temperature 38 degrees C or more (score 1 each). The OR for the two groups were 1.80 and 1.76, respectively, indicating that score was reproducible. With a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 83% it would be at least as accurate as clinical judgment. The normal appendicectomy rate would be 7% instead of 9%. and the negative exploration rates (laparoscopy and primary appendicectomy) would both be 22%. The score would also result in a lower perforation rate (2% compared with 17%).

CONCLUSION

The score can indicate when there is an indication for laparoscopy in patients with suspected appendicitis.

摘要

目的

开发一种可重复的评分系统,以识别阑尾炎诊断存疑且能从诊断性腹腔镜检查中获益的患者。

设计

前瞻性观察性研究。

地点

荷兰的地区教学医院。

研究对象

1994年至1995年期间连续纳入的577例患者,以及1996年至1997年期间就诊的343例患者。

干预措施

从早期组中提取似乎可预测急性阑尾炎的变量,进行逻辑回归分析并创建评分。该评分在1996年至1997年期间就诊的343例患者中进行验证,然后将两组合并进行进一步分析。

主要观察指标

通过比较两组的比值比(OR)获得评分系统的可重复性;通过比较延迟阑尾切除术和正常阑尾切除术的发生率来判断其有效性。

结果

以下变量与急性阑尾炎的存在显著相关:白细胞计数10×10⁹/L及以上(得3分)、反跳痛和男性(各得2分);症状出现时间<48小时和体温38℃及以上(各得1分)。两组的OR分别为1.80和1.76,表明评分具有可重复性。其灵敏度为93%,特异度为83%,至少与临床判断一样准确。正常阑尾切除术的发生率将从9%降至7%,阴性探查率(腹腔镜检查和初次阑尾切除术)均为22%。该评分还将导致穿孔率降低(从17%降至2%)。

结论

该评分可表明疑似阑尾炎患者何时有进行腹腔镜检查的指征。

相似文献

1
Scoring and diagnostic laparoscopy for suspected appendicitis.针对疑似阑尾炎的评分与诊断性腹腔镜检查
Eur J Surg. 2002;168(6):349-54. doi: 10.1080/11024150260284860.
2
A prospective evaluation of the combined use of the modified Alvarado score with selective laparoscopy in adult females in the management of suspected appendicitis.对改良阿尔瓦拉多评分与选择性腹腔镜检查联合用于成年女性疑似阑尾炎管理的前瞻性评估。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2000 May;82(3):192-5.
3
Application of alvarado scoring system in diagnosis of acute appendicitis.阿尔瓦拉多评分系统在急性阑尾炎诊断中的应用。
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2005 Jul-Sep;17(3):41-4.
4
Accurate diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a retrospective and prospective analysis of 686 patients.急性阑尾炎的准确诊断:686例患者的回顾性与前瞻性分析
Eur J Surg. 1992 Apr;158(4):227-31.
5
Diagnostic accuracy of inflammatory markers in patients operated on for suspected acute appendicitis: a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.疑似急性阑尾炎手术患者炎症标志物的诊断准确性:受试者工作特征曲线分析
Eur J Surg. 1999 Jul;165(7):679-85. doi: 10.1080/11024159950189744.
6
[Can diagnostic scoring systems help decision making in primary care of patients with suspected acute appendicitis?].[诊断评分系统能否有助于疑似急性阑尾炎患者的基层医疗决策?]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1999 May 7;124(18):545-50. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1024357.
7
Why does the clinical diagnosis fail in suspected appendicitis?为什么疑似阑尾炎的临床诊断会失败?
Eur J Surg. 2000 Oct;166(10):796-802. doi: 10.1080/110241500447434.
8
Diagnostic laparoscopy reduces unnecessary appendicectomy in fertile women.诊断性腹腔镜检查可减少育龄妇女不必要的阑尾切除术。
Eur J Surg. 1994 Jan;160(1):41-5.
9
Clinical value of the total white blood cell count and temperature in the evaluation of patients with suspected appendicitis.白细胞总数及体温在疑似阑尾炎患者评估中的临床价值。
Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Oct;11(10):1021-7. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.04.011.
10
Diagnostic scores for acute appendicitis. Abdominal Pain Study Group.急性阑尾炎的诊断评分。腹痛研究组。
Eur J Surg. 1995 Apr;161(4):273-81.

引用本文的文献

1
Acute appendicitis-advances and controversies.急性阑尾炎——进展与争议
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Nov 27;13(11):1293-1314. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i11.1293.
2
Evaluation of appendicitis risk prediction models in adults with suspected appendicitis.成人疑似阑尾炎患者阑尾炎风险预测模型的评估。
Br J Surg. 2020 Jan;107(1):73-86. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11440. Epub 2019 Dec 3.
3
Evaluation of the predictive power of laboratory markers in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in the elderly.评估实验室指标对老年急性阑尾炎诊断的预测能力。
North Clin Istanb. 2019 Jul 8;6(3):293-301. doi: 10.14744/nci.2019.93457. eCollection 2019.
4
Clinical Prediction Rules for Appendicitis in Adults: Which Is Best?成人阑尾炎的临床预测规则:哪一种最佳?
World J Surg. 2017 Jul;41(7):1769-1781. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-3926-6.
5
Acute appendicitis in young children less than 5 years: review article.5岁以下幼儿急性阑尾炎:综述文章
Ital J Pediatr. 2017 Jan 26;43(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13052-017-0335-2.
6
The Fenyö-Lindberg scoring system for appendicitis increases positive predictive value in fertile women--a prospective study in 455 patients randomized to either laparoscopic or open appendectomy.芬尼奥-林德伯格阑尾炎评分系统可提高育龄妇女的阳性预测值——一项针对455例随机接受腹腔镜或开腹阑尾切除术患者的前瞻性研究
Surg Endosc. 2004 Oct;18(10):1509-13. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9323-2. Epub 2004 Aug 24.