Duckworth Kimberly L, Bargh John A, Garcia Magda, Chaiken Shelly
Department of Psychology, New York University, New York 10003, USA.
Psychol Sci. 2002 Nov;13(6):513-9. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00490.
From classic theory and research in psychology, we distill a broad theoretical statement that evaluative responding can be immediate, unintentional, implicit, stimulus based, and linked directly to approach and avoidance motives. This statement suggests that evaluative responses should be elicited by novel, nonrepresentational stimuli (e.g., abstract art, "foreign" words). We tested this hypothesis through combining the best features of relevant automatic-affect research paradigms. We first obtained explicit evaluative ratings of novel stimuli. From these, we selected normatively positive and negative stimuli to use as primes in a sequential priming paradigm. Two experiments using this paradigm demonstrated that briefly presented novel prime stimuli were evaluated automatically, as they facilitated responses to subsequently presented target stimuli of the same valence just as much as did pictures or names of real objects. A final experiment revealed that exposure to novel stimuli produces muscular predispositions to approach or avoid them.
从心理学的经典理论和研究中,我们提炼出一个宽泛的理论观点,即评价性反应可以是即时的、无意的、隐性的、基于刺激的,并且直接与趋近和回避动机相关联。这一观点表明,评价性反应应由新颖的、非具象的刺激(如抽象艺术、“外来”词汇)引发。我们通过结合相关自动情感研究范式的最佳特征来检验这一假设。我们首先获得了对新颖刺激的明确评价等级。据此,我们挑选出具有规范意义上积极和消极的刺激,将其用作序列启动范式中的启动刺激。使用该范式的两项实验表明,短暂呈现的新颖启动刺激会被自动评价,因为它们促进了对随后呈现的相同效价目标刺激的反应,其程度与真实物体的图片或名称相同。最后一项实验表明,接触新颖刺激会产生趋近或回避它们的肌肉倾向。