DePue J D, Goldstein M G, Schilling A, Reiss P, Papandonatos G, Sciamanna C, Kazura A
The Centers for Behavioral and Preventive Medicine, the Miriam Hospital/Brown Medical School, Providence, Rhode Island 02903, USA.
Tob Control. 2002 Dec;11(4):329-35. doi: 10.1136/tc.11.4.329.
To evaluate dissemination of the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research (AHCPR) Smoking cessation clinical practice guideline in community health centres.
Pre- and post-trial.
Fourteen community health centres in Rhode Island.
Provider performance was assessed with 1798 and 1591 patient contacts, in pre-post cross sectional consecutive samples, respectively, and 891 contacts at one year follow up.
Three, one hour on-site provider training sessions, on review of effective tobacco interventions, use of office systems, and tobacco counselling skill building.
Chart documentation of four A's (Ask, Advise, Assist, and Arrange follow up) at most recent primary care visit.
While average performance rates increased for Ask and Advise (from 30% to 44%, and 19% to 26%, pre-post, respectively), significant increases were found only for some visit types, with further differences by patient sex. There were significant increases for Ask for all except obstetric/gynaecological (ob/gyn) visit types. Patients at yearly physicals and first visits were more likely to be asked at all time points, while males were more likely to be asked at acute visits than were females. There were no significant increases for Advise, Assist, and Arrange across time, although female patients showed a differential increase in Advise post-training. Advise was significantly more likely in yearly physicals and first visits, and less likely in ob/gyn visits, at all time points.
This guideline dissemination effort resulted in quite different provider counselling rates across patient sexes, and visit types. Guideline implementation may require more sustained efforts, with multiple strategies, which are reinforced at higher policy levels, to more fully integrate tobacco interventions into routine primary care practice with all patients who smoke.
评估医疗保健政策与研究机构(AHCPR)戒烟临床实践指南在社区卫生中心的传播情况。
试验前和试验后研究。
罗德岛的14个社区卫生中心。
在前后连续横断面样本中,分别通过1798次和1591次患者接触评估提供者的表现,并在一年随访时进行891次接触。
开展三次为时一小时的现场提供者培训课程,内容包括有效烟草干预措施回顾、办公系统使用以及烟草咨询技能培养。
在最近一次初级保健就诊时,对四个“A”(询问、建议、协助和安排随访)的图表记录。
虽然询问和建议的平均执行率有所提高(前后分别从30%提高到44%,从19%提高到26%),但仅在某些就诊类型中发现有显著提高,且因患者性别存在进一步差异。除妇产科(ob/gyn)就诊类型外,所有其他类型就诊时询问的执行率均有显著提高。年度体检和初次就诊的患者在所有时间点都更有可能被询问,而在急性病就诊时,男性比女性更有可能被询问。建议、协助和安排随访在各时间点均无显著提高,不过女性患者在培训后建议的执行率有差异增加。在所有时间点,年度体检和初次就诊时建议的可能性显著更高,而妇产科就诊时可能性更低。
这项指南传播工作导致不同性别患者和不同就诊类型的提供者咨询率差异很大。指南的实施可能需要更持续的努力,采用多种策略,并在更高政策层面得到强化,以便将烟草干预更全面地纳入对所有吸烟患者的常规初级保健实践中。