Suppr超能文献

营利性与非营利性私立血液透析中心死亡率的比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析

Comparison of mortality between private for-profit and private not-for-profit hemodialysis centers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Devereaux P J, Schünemann Holger J, Ravindran Nikila, Bhandari Mohit, Garg Amit X, Choi Peter T-L, Grant Brydon J B, Haines Ted, Lacchetti Christina, Weaver Bruce, Lavis John N, Cook Deborah J, Haslam David R S, Sullivan Terrence, Guyatt Gordon H

机构信息

Depatment of Medicine, McMaster University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8N 3Z5.

出版信息

JAMA. 2002 Nov 20;288(19):2449-57. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.19.2449.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Private for-profit and private not-for-profit dialysis facilities provide the majority of hemodialysis care in the United States. There has been extensive debate about whether the profit status of these facilities influences patient mortality.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether a difference in adjusted mortality rates exists between hemodialysis patients receiving care in private for-profit vs private not-for-profit dialysis centers.

DATA SOURCES

We searched 11 bibliographic databases, reviewed our own files, and contacted experts in June 2001-January 2002. In June 2002, we also searched PubMed using the "related articles" feature, SciSearch, and the reference lists of all studies that fulfilled our eligibility criteria.

STUDY SELECTION

We included published and unpublished observational studies that directly compared the mortality rates of hemodialysis patients in private for-profit and private not-for-profit dialysis centers and provided adjusted mortality rates. We masked the study results prior to determining study eligibility, and teams of 2 reviewers independently evaluated the eligibility of all studies. Eight observational studies that included more than 500 000 patient-years of data fulfilled our eligibility criteria.

DATA EXTRACTION

Teams of 2 reviewers independently abstracted data on study characteristics, sampling method, data sources, and factors controlled for in the analyses. Reviewers resolved disagreements by consensus.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The studies reported data from January 1, 1973, through December 31, 1997, and included a median of 1342 facilities per study. Six of the 8 studies showed a statistically significant increase in adjusted mortality in for-profit facilities, 1 showed a nonsignificant trend toward increased mortality in for-profit facilities, and 1 showed a nonsignificant trend toward decreased mortality in for-profit facilities. The pooled estimate, using a random-effects model, demonstrated that private for-profit dialysis centers were associated with an increased risk of death (relative risk, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.13; P<.001). This relative risk suggests that there are annually 2500 (with a plausible range of 1200-4000) excessive premature deaths in US for-profit dialysis centers.

CONCLUSIONS

Hemodialysis care in private not-for-profit centers is associated with a lower risk of mortality compared with care in private for-profit centers.

摘要

背景

在美国,私立营利性和私立非营利性透析机构提供了大部分的血液透析护理服务。关于这些机构的营利性质是否会影响患者死亡率,一直存在广泛的争论。

目的

确定在私立营利性透析中心接受治疗的血液透析患者与在私立非营利性透析中心接受治疗的患者之间,调整后的死亡率是否存在差异。

数据来源

我们检索了11个文献数据库,查阅了我们自己的档案,并在2001年6月至2002年1月期间联系了专家。2002年6月,我们还使用“相关文章”功能在PubMed、SciSearch以及所有符合我们纳入标准的研究的参考文献列表中进行了检索。

研究选择

我们纳入了已发表和未发表的观察性研究,这些研究直接比较了私立营利性和私立非营利性透析中心血液透析患者的死亡率,并提供了调整后的死亡率。在确定研究纳入标准之前,我们对研究结果进行了屏蔽,由两名评审员组成的团队独立评估所有研究的纳入资格。八项观察性研究纳入了超过500000患者年的数据,符合我们的纳入标准。

数据提取

由两名评审员组成的团队独立提取有关研究特征、抽样方法、数据来源以及分析中控制的因素的数据。评审员通过协商一致解决分歧。

数据综合

这些研究报告的数据时间跨度为1973年1月1日至1997年12月31日,每项研究纳入的机构中位数为1342家。八项研究中的六项显示,营利性机构调整后的死亡率有统计学意义的升高,一项显示营利性机构死亡率有升高的非显著趋势,一项显示营利性机构死亡率有降低的非显著趋势。使用随机效应模型的汇总估计表明,私立营利性透析中心与死亡风险增加相关(相对风险,1.08;95%置信区间,1.04 - 1.13;P <.001)。这一相对风险表明,美国营利性透析中心每年有2500例(合理范围为1200 - 4000例)过早死亡。

结论

与私立营利性中心的护理相比,私立非营利性中心的血液透析护理与较低的死亡风险相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验