Kaminer Yifrah, Burleson Joseph A, Goldberger Ronit
Department of Psychiatry, University of Connecticut Health Center, 263 Farmington Avenue, Farmington, Connecticut 06030-2103, USA.
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2002 Nov;190(11):737-45. doi: 10.1097/00005053-200211000-00003.
The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) versus psychoeducational therapy (PET) for adolescent substance abusers. Eighty-eight consecutively referred predominantly dually diagnosed adolescents were randomized to one of two eight-week, outpatient group psychotherapy conditions. Drug urinalysis and the Teen-Addiction Severity Index (T-ASI) were used as outcome measurements. Treatment completion rate was 86%, follow-up location rate was 95%, and rates of posttreatment at 3- and 9-month follow-up evaluation were 80% and 65%, respectively. Comorbid conduct disorder was significantly associated with treatment noncompletion and reduced follow-up rate. CBT subjects exhibited significantly lower rates of positive urinalysis than did PET subjects for older youth and male subjects at 3-month follow-up evaluation. Most T-ASI subscales indicated sound improvement from baseline to 3- and 9-month follow-up evaluation across conditions. Reduction in substance use was achieved regardless of treatment conditions. Replication of these findings, continued exploration of potential matching effects of conduct disorder, age, and gender to singular or integrative treatment modalities, and exploration of aftercare programs for the maintenance or enhancement of treatment gains are warranted.
本研究的目的是比较认知行为疗法(CBT)与心理教育疗法(PET)对青少年药物滥用者的疗效。八十八名连续转诊的主要为双重诊断的青少年被随机分配到两种为期八周的门诊团体心理治疗方案之一。药物尿液分析和青少年成瘾严重程度指数(T-ASI)被用作疗效指标。治疗完成率为86%,随访定位率为95%,3个月和9个月随访评估时的治疗后率分别为80%和65%。共病品行障碍与治疗未完成和随访率降低显著相关。在3个月随访评估中,对于年龄较大的青少年和男性受试者,CBT组的尿液分析阳性率显著低于PET组。大多数T-ASI分量表表明,从基线到3个月和9个月随访评估,所有治疗方案均有明显改善。无论治疗方案如何,药物使用均有所减少。有必要重复这些研究结果,继续探索品行障碍、年龄和性别与单一或综合治疗方式的潜在匹配效应,并探索用于维持或增强治疗效果的后续护理方案。