• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

肠吻合术。各种手术技术的比较研究。

Bowel anastomosis. A comparative study of various surgical techniques.

作者信息

El-Bakry Abdelkarim A

机构信息

Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, King Khalid University Hospital, College of Medicine, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Saudi Med J. 2002 Oct;23(10):1232-6.

PMID:12436128
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Mechanical suture (stapler) has been in use for bowel anastomosis since the second half of the 20th century, however, it became popular since it was used widely by the United States of America in the late 1960. Since it is more expensive than the conventional method, a local experimental assessment was introduced to compare stapler with conventional methods.

METHODS

Eighteen local dogs were used, 36 anastomosis were assessed in the animal house operating theater of King Khalid University Hospital, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia between October 1998 and March 2000.

RESULTS

The weight needed to disrupt the anastomosis was more in the stapler technique, the amount of intraperitoneal fluid, adhesion and the inflammatory response in histopathological study were less in the stapler technique. Our study has shown that the stapler technique is superior when compared with conventional bowel anastomosis.

CONCLUSION

We recommend stapler use in bowel anastomosis whenever clinically feasible.

摘要

目的

机械缝合(吻合器)自20世纪下半叶起就用于肠道吻合术,然而,自20世纪60年代末被美国广泛使用后才开始流行。由于其比传统方法更昂贵,因此引入了一项局部实验评估来比较吻合器与传统方法。

方法

使用了18只当地的狗,1998年10月至2000年3月期间在沙特阿拉伯王国利雅得市哈立德国王大学医院的动物房手术室对36例吻合术进行了评估。

结果

破坏吻合口所需的重量在吻合器技术组更大,组织病理学研究中吻合器技术组的腹腔内液体量、粘连及炎症反应更少。我们的研究表明,与传统肠道吻合术相比,吻合器技术更具优势。

结论

我们建议在临床可行的情况下,在肠道吻合术中使用吻合器。

相似文献

1
Bowel anastomosis. A comparative study of various surgical techniques.肠吻合术。各种手术技术的比较研究。
Saudi Med J. 2002 Oct;23(10):1232-6.
2
An experimental technique of laparoscopic bowel resection and reanastomosis.一种腹腔镜肠切除与吻合术的实验技术。
Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1992 Sep;2(3):205-11.
3
Keyhole procedure: a new technique for intestinal anastomosis with a large opening and less tissue trauma, using both circular and linear staplers.锁孔手术:一种使用圆形和线性吻合器进行肠吻合的新技术,开口大且组织创伤小。
Surgery. 2003 Mar;133(3):345-8. doi: 10.1067/msy.2003.106.
4
[Biofragmentable anastomosis ring (BAR) in surgery of the digestive system].[生物可降解吻合环(BAR)在消化系统手术中的应用]
Minerva Chir. 1999 Oct;54(10):685-95.
5
The current evidence on stapled versus hand-sewn anastomoses in the digestive tract.关于消化道吻合术中吻合器吻合与手工缝合吻合的现有证据。
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2008;17(3):151-4. doi: 10.1080/13645700802103423.
6
[New technical and methodologic developments in surgery: mechanical suture technique].[外科手术中的新技术与方法进展:机械缝合技术]
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl II Verh Dtsch Ges Chir. 1989:359-63.
7
Thoracoscopic construction of an intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis using a circular stapler: transoral placement of the anvil.使用圆形吻合器经胸腔镜构建胸段食管胃吻合术:砧座经口置入
Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Sep;86(3):989-92. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.03.034.
8
[Viscerosynthesis--use of mechanical sutures in digestive tract surgery].[内脏缝合术——机械缝合线在消化道手术中的应用]
Vojnosanit Pregl. 1990 Mar-Apr;47(2):91-5.
9
Usefulness of automatic triangular anastomosis for esophageal cancer surgery using a linear stapler (TA-30).使用线性吻合器(TA-30)进行自动三角形吻合术在食管癌手术中的实用性。
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Apr;11(2):80-6.
10
Parameters of healing in approximative intestinal anastomosis.近似肠吻合术的愈合参数。
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2009 Feb;19(1):25-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1039010. Epub 2009 Feb 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of standard 4-row versus 6-row3-D linear cutter stapler in creation of gastrointestinal system anastomoses: a prospective randomized trial.标准 4 排与 6 排 3-D 线性切割吻合器在胃肠道吻合术中的比较:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2012 Sep;67(9):1035-8. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2012(09)09.