Suppr超能文献

双重对比钡灌肠大肠直肠癌筛查:一项针对诊断放射科医生的全国性调查。

Colorectal cancer screening with double-contrast barium enema: a national survey of diagnostic radiologists.

作者信息

Klabunde Carrie N, Jones Elizabeth, Brown Martin L, Davis William W

机构信息

Health Services and Economics Branch, Applied Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Executive Plaza North, Rm. 4005, 6130 Executive Blvd., Bethesda, MD 20892-7344, USA.

出版信息

AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Dec;179(6):1419-27. doi: 10.2214/ajr.179.6.1791419.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This article describes diagnostic radiologists' colorectal cancer screening activities and beliefs about screening effectiveness and future capacity for screening with double-contrast barium enema, and compares radiologists' opinions about colorectal cancer screening with those of primary care physicians.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We surveyed a nationally representative sample of diagnostic radiologists. Of 381 eligible radiologists, 312 (82%) responded. Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests were used to assess radiologists' opinions about double-contrast barium enema volume and capacity and to compare radiologists' beliefs about colorectal cancer screening with those of primary care physicians. Logistic regression was used to identify characteristics of radiologists who receive referrals for or perform a higher volume of screening double-contrast barium enema and of those who expect the volume of double-contrast barium enemas to increase.

RESULTS

Seventy-five percent of radiologists said that double-contrast barium enema is a "very effective" colorectal cancer screening procedure compared with 33% of primary care physicians. Although 86% of radiologists reported performing one or more screening double-contrast barium enema procedures during a typical month, only 27% indicated that they did so 11 or more times. Fifteen percent of radiologists said that their double-contrast barium enema volume had increased over the past 3 years, and 50% expect an increase over the next 3 years. Only 8% said that the capacity of facilities and personnel to meet the demand for double-contrast barium enemas in their geographic area of practice is inadequate. Geographic region and belief in double-contrast barium enema efficacy were predictors of double-contrast barium enema volume and referrals.

CONCLUSION

Most diagnostic radiologists perform colorectal cancer screening with double-contrast barium enema, but procedure volumes are modest. Because primary care physicians view double-contrast barium enema less positively than do radiologists, radiologists' expectations for an increased volume of double-contrast barium enemas over the next few years may not be realized.

摘要

目的

本文描述了诊断放射科医生的结肠直肠癌筛查活动,以及他们对双重对比钡灌肠筛查效果和未来筛查能力的看法,并将放射科医生对结肠直肠癌筛查的意见与初级保健医生的意见进行比较。

材料与方法

我们对全国具有代表性的诊断放射科医生样本进行了调查。在381名符合条件的放射科医生中,312名(82%)做出了回应。描述性统计和卡方检验用于评估放射科医生对双重对比钡灌肠数量和能力的看法,并将放射科医生对结肠直肠癌筛查的看法与初级保健医生的看法进行比较。逻辑回归用于确定接受双重对比钡灌肠筛查转诊或进行更高数量筛查的放射科医生的特征,以及那些预计双重对比钡灌肠数量会增加的放射科医生的特征。

结果

75%的放射科医生表示双重对比钡灌肠是一种“非常有效的”结肠直肠癌筛查方法,而初级保健医生中这一比例为33%。尽管86%的放射科医生报告在一个典型月份进行了一次或多次双重对比钡灌肠筛查,但只有27%的人表示进行了11次或更多次。15%的放射科医生表示他们的双重对比钡灌肠数量在过去3年中有所增加,50%的人预计在未来3年会增加。只有8%的人表示其所在执业地理区域的设施和人员满足双重对比钡灌肠需求的能力不足。地理区域和对双重对比钡灌肠疗效的信念是双重对比钡灌肠数量和转诊的预测因素。

结论

大多数诊断放射科医生采用双重对比钡灌肠进行结肠直肠癌筛查,但检查数量适中。由于初级保健医生对双重对比钡灌肠的看法不如放射科医生积极,放射科医生对未来几年双重对比钡灌肠数量增加的预期可能无法实现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验