Pacharn Preeyacha, Poe Stacy A, Donnelly Lane F
Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Ave., Cincinnati, OH 45229-3039, USA.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Dec;179(6):1523-7. doi: 10.2214/ajr.179.6.1791523.
The purpose of our study was to review the technical success achieved using low-tube-current multidetector CT for the evaluation of children with suspected extrinsic airway compression and to evaluate the need for sedation during this procedure.
We reviewed all CT examinations performed for the evaluation of extrinsic airway compression during the first year after installation of a multidetector CT scanner at a pediatric hospital. We recorded the technical parameters including tube current, kilovoltage, slice thickness, mode of study, sedation technique, and amount of contrast material and noted which postprocessing techniques were applied. Studies were evaluated for timing of contrast bolus, image quality, motion artifact, need for sedation, and the diagnoses made.
Fifty-four studies were performed in 50 patients (30 boys, 20 girls; age range, 15 days to 17 years; mean age, 2.4 years). The mean tube current was 52.2 mA (range, 30-140 mA). Thirty-four studies (63%) were performed without sedation: 12 with sedation administered under supervision of the radiologist, six with general anesthesia supervised by an anesthesiologist, and two in patients who arrived in the radiology department already intubated. Imaging quality was excellent in 35 studies (65%), diagnostic in 19 studies (35%), and poor in none. Motion artifact was present on several slices in two examinations (4%). Contrast medium administration was well-timed in 49 studies (91%), early in three studies (5%), and late in two studies (4%). Airway abnormalities were detected in 26 (48%) of the studies and included extrinsic compression by vascular anomalies (n = 14) or nonvascular masses (n = 5) and intrinsic airway disease without extrinsic compression (n = 7).
Evaluation for extrinsic compression of the airway in children can be accomplished using a low-tube-current multidetector CT protocol; in most pediatric patients, the examination can be performed without sedation.
我们研究的目的是回顾使用低管电流多排螺旋CT评估疑似小儿气道外压的技术成功率,并评估在此过程中镇静的必要性。
我们回顾了一家儿童医院安装多排螺旋CT扫描仪后的第一年中,所有用于评估气道外压的CT检查。我们记录了技术参数,包括管电流、千伏、层厚、检查模式、镇静技术、对比剂用量,并记录了应用了哪些后处理技术。评估研究的对比剂团注时间、图像质量、运动伪影、镇静需求及诊断结果。
对50例患者(30例男孩,20例女孩;年龄范围15天至17岁;平均年龄2.4岁)进行了54项检查。平均管电流为52.2毫安(范围30 - 140毫安)。34项检查(63%)未使用镇静:12项在放射科医生监督下给予镇静,6项在麻醉医生监督下进行全身麻醉,2项是到达放射科时已插管的患者。35项检查(65%)图像质量优秀,19项检查(35%)图像质量可用于诊断,无图像质量差的情况。两项检查(4%)的多个层面出现运动伪影。49项检查(91%)对比剂注射时间合适,三项检查(5%)过早,两项检查(4%)过晚。26项检查(48%)发现气道异常,包括血管异常(n = 14)或非血管肿块(n = 5)引起的外压以及无外压的气道内疾病(n = 7)。
使用低管电流多排螺旋CT方案可完成小儿气道外压的评估;在大多数儿科患者中,检查无需镇静即可进行。