Suppr超能文献

用重组恶性疟原虫顶膜抗原1对猴子进行疫苗接种可提供针对血液阶段疟疾的保护。

Vaccination of monkeys with recombinant Plasmodium falciparum apical membrane antigen 1 confers protection against blood-stage malaria.

作者信息

Stowers Anthony W, Kennedy Michael C, Keegan Brian P, Saul Allan, Long Carole A, Miller Louis H

机构信息

Malaria Vaccine Development Unit, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland 20852, USA.

出版信息

Infect Immun. 2002 Dec;70(12):6961-7. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.12.6961-6967.2002.

Abstract

A major challenge facing malaria vaccine development programs is identifying efficacious combinations of antigens. To date, merozoite surface protein 1 (MSP1) is regarded as the leading asexual vaccine candidate. Apical membrane antigen 1 (AMA1) has been identified as another leading candidate for an asexual malaria vaccine, but without any direct in vivo evidence that a recombinant form of Plasmodium falciparum AMA1 would have efficacy. We evaluated the efficacy of a form of P. falciparum AMA1, produced in Pichia pastoris, by vaccinating Aotus vociferans monkeys and then challenging them with P. falciparum parasites. Significant protection from this otherwise lethal challenge with P. falciparum was observed. Five of six animals had delayed patency; two of these remained subpatent for the course of the infection, and two controlled parasite growth at <0.75% of red blood cells parasitized. The protection induced by AMA1 was superior to that obtained with a form of MSP1 used in the same trial. The protection induced by a combination vaccine of AMA1 and MSP1 was not superior to the protection obtained with AMA1 alone, although the immunity generated appeared to operate against both vaccine components.

摘要

疟疾疫苗研发项目面临的一个主要挑战是确定有效的抗原组合。迄今为止,裂殖子表面蛋白1(MSP1)被视为主要的无性繁殖期疫苗候选抗原。顶膜抗原1(AMA1)已被确定为无性繁殖期疟疾疫苗的另一个主要候选抗原,但尚无直接的体内证据表明重组恶性疟原虫AMA1具有疗效。我们通过给夜猴接种在毕赤酵母中产生的一种恶性疟原虫AMA1,然后用恶性疟原虫寄生虫对它们进行攻击,来评估其疗效。观察到对这种原本致命的恶性疟原虫攻击有显著的保护作用。六只动物中有五只的虫血症出现延迟;其中两只在感染过程中一直处于亚虫血症状态,另外两只将寄生虫生长控制在寄生红细胞的0.75%以下。AMA1诱导的保护作用优于同一试验中使用的一种MSP1所获得的保护作用。AMA1和MSP1联合疫苗诱导的保护作用并不优于单独使用AMA1所获得的保护作用,尽管产生的免疫似乎对两种疫苗成分都起作用。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验