Hengstenberg Christian, Bröckel Ulrich, Holmer Stephan, Mayer Björn, Fischer Marcus, Baessler Andrea, Erdmann Jeanette, Lieb Wolfgang, Löwel Hannelore, Riegger Günter, Schunkert Heribert
Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin II, Universitätsklinik Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Herz. 2002 Nov;27(7):649-61. doi: 10.1007/s00059-002-2432-1.
Coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction are the most frequent causes of death in the Western societies. Even nowadays, every second myocardial infarction is lethal and hits the patients unexpectedly without previous signs or symptoms. In order to install preventive measures most efficiently, it is necessary to have a detailed knowledge on the pathophysiology of the disease. The identification of patients who are at high risk for suffering from myocardial infarction can be done with epidemiological methods, such as the determination of "traditional" risk factors, like arterial hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes mellitus or smoking), or eventually in the future using molecular genetic testing. This is of great importance especially for asymptomatic siblings and children from myocardial infarction patients.
Although traditional risk factors occur frequently in families, they explain only in part the familial accumulation of coronary artery disease. Furthermore, stron genetic effects on the development of coronary artery disease and myocardial infarction have been demonstrated in several studies. These genetic effects can be examined by 1. a candidate gene approach, or 2. a systematic screening of the whole genome. In the first step, several polymorphisms (sequence variations) wee examined in several candidate genes in which a significant influence on a cardiovascular risk factor or intermediate phenotype (such as atherogeneic lipid profile or arterial hypertension) has been shown in the literature. We thus examined in a large population of patients with myocardial infarction and a sample of the general population the effects of the HindIII polymorphism in the lipoproteinlipase gene, of the -344T/C promoter polymorphism in the aldosterone synthase gene and of the 825C/T polymorphism in the gene of the beta3 subunit of the G protein gene (GNB3). In the general population, we could show an association with unfavorable lipid levels in men and in postmenopausal (but not premenopausal) women for the H2H2 genotype of the HindIII lipoproteinlipase polymorphism. However, the theoretical increase in risk for this genotype is not large enough to demonstrate a significant association with myocardial infarction in the population examined. With the promoter polymorphism in the aldosterone synthase gene, anthropometrical and echocardiographical data did not suggest that the polymorphism is a risk factor for myocardial infarction nor for left ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction, which was observed in earlier studies. Furthermore, we could show an association with arterial hypertension in our general population sample with the polymorphism in the GNB3 gene. However, no association could be demonstrated for this polymorphism with myocardial infarction. AFFECTED SIB-PAIR APPROACH: In a systematic screening of the genome for genes that are relevant in the pathogenesis of coronary artery disease or myocardial infarction, an affected sib-pair approach was followed. 1,261 families were identified in which at least two brothers or sisters were affected with myocardial infarction or severe coronary artery disease, such as percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary after bypass grafting. In a subpopulation of 513 families and 1,407 individuals, we performed a total genome screening. The analyses using the variance component method and the SOLAR program revealed a susceptibility locus for myocardial infarction of chromosome 14q32 with a lod score of 3.89 (genome-wide p < 0.05). This locus comprises a region of about seven centi-Morgan and contains approximately 150 genes. Furthermore, a comprehensive analysis including the cardiovascular risk factors showed that 1. this myocardial infarction locus is unique and does not overlap with chromosomal loci for well-established risk factors, 2. cardiovascular risk factors, such as Lp(a), diabetes mellitus, serum lipids, or arterial hypertension have strong genetic components.
These findings do not exclude a role of cardiovascular s do not exclude a role of cardiovascular risk factors or candidate genes in the pathogenesis of myocardial infarction, but rather demonstrate that risk factors may act as surrogates of specific underlying disease mechanisms. It is thus necessary to perform a comprehensive analysis of complex polygenic diseases, such as myocardial infarction, including both, established cardiovascular risk factors and genomic data.
冠状动脉疾病和心肌梗死是西方社会最常见的死亡原因。即使在如今,每两例心肌梗死中仍有一例是致命的,且会在毫无先前迹象或症状的情况下突然袭击患者。为了最有效地采取预防措施,有必要详细了解该疾病的病理生理学。可以通过流行病学方法识别出有心肌梗死高风险的患者,比如确定“传统”风险因素,如动脉高血压、高胆固醇血症、糖尿病或吸烟),或者最终在未来使用分子基因检测。这对于心肌梗死患者的无症状兄弟姐妹和子女尤为重要。
尽管传统风险因素在家族中经常出现,但它们仅部分解释了冠状动脉疾病的家族聚集现象。此外,多项研究已证明基因对冠状动脉疾病和心肌梗死的发生发展有强烈影响。这些基因效应可以通过以下两种方法进行研究:1. 候选基因法,或2. 全基因组系统筛查。第一步,在几个候选基因中检测了几种多态性(序列变异),文献表明这些基因对心血管风险因素或中间表型(如致动脉粥样硬化血脂谱或动脉高血压)有显著影响。因此,我们在大量心肌梗死患者群体和一般人群样本中,研究了脂蛋白脂肪酶基因中HindIII多态性、醛固酮合酶基因中 -344T/C启动子多态性以及G蛋白基因β3亚基基因(GNB3)中825C/T多态性的影响。在一般人群中,我们发现HindIII脂蛋白脂肪酶多态性的H2H2基因型与男性及绝经后(而非绝经前)女性的不良血脂水平有关。然而,该基因型理论上的风险增加幅度不足以在研究人群中证明与心肌梗死有显著关联。对于醛固酮合酶基因的启动子多态性,人体测量和超声心动图数据并未表明该多态性是心肌梗死的风险因素,也不是心肌梗死后左心室重构的风险因素,而早期研究曾观察到这种关联。此外,我们在一般人群样本中发现GNB3基因多态性与动脉高血压有关。然而,未证明该多态性与心肌梗死有关。受累同胞对法:在对与冠状动脉疾病或心肌梗死发病机制相关基因进行全基因组系统筛查时,采用了受累同胞对法。确定了1261个家庭,其中至少有两个兄弟姐妹患有心肌梗死或严重冠状动脉疾病,如经皮冠状动脉介入治疗或冠状动脉搭桥术后。在513个家庭和1407名个体的亚群体中,我们进行了全基因组筛查。使用方差成分法和SOLAR程序进行的分析显示,14号染色体q32上存在一个心肌梗死易感位点,对数优势分数为3.89(全基因组p < 0.05)。该位点包含约七个厘摩的区域,大约有150个基因。此外,一项包括心血管风险因素的综合分析表明:1. 这个心肌梗死位点是独特的,与已确定的风险因素的染色体位点不重叠;2. 心血管风险因素,如脂蛋白(a)、糖尿病、血脂或动脉高血压有很强的遗传成分。
这些发现并不排除心血管风险因素或候选基因在心肌梗死发病机制中的作用,而是表明风险因素可能是特定潜在疾病机制的替代指标。因此,有必要对心肌梗死等复杂多基因疾病进行综合分析,包括已确定的心血管风险因素和基因组数据。