Pitchforth E, Russell E, Van der Pol M
Department of Public Health, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Br J Cancer. 2002 Nov 18;87(11):1221-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600640.
The first principle of the Calman-Hine report's recommendations on cancer services was that all patients should have access to a uniformly high quality of care wherever they may live. This study aimed to assess whether the uptake of chemotherapy for colorectal cancer varied by hospital type in Scotland. Hospitals were classified according to cancer specialisation rather than volume of patients. To indicate cancer specialisation, hospitals were classified as 'cancer centres', 'cancer units' and 'non-cancer' hospitals. Colorectal cancer cases were obtained from cancer registrations linked to hospital discharge data for the period January 1992 to December 1996. Multilevel logistic regression was used to model the binary outcome, namely whether or not a patient received chemotherapy within 6 months of first admission to any hospital. The results showed that patients admitted first to a 'non-cancer' hospital were less than half as likely to go on to receive chemotherapy as those first admitted to a cancer unit or centre (OR=0.28). This result was not explained by distance between hospital of first admission and nearest cancer centre, nor by increasing age or severity of illness. The study covers the period immediately preceding the introduction of the Calman-Hine report in Scotland and should serve as a baseline for future monitoring of access to specialist care.
卡尔曼 - 海因报告关于癌症服务的建议的首要原则是,所有患者无论居住在何处,都应能获得统一的高质量护理。本研究旨在评估苏格兰结直肠癌化疗的接受情况是否因医院类型而异。医院是根据癌症专科分类,而非患者数量分类。为表明癌症专科情况,医院被分为“癌症中心”“癌症科室”和“非癌症”医院。结直肠癌病例取自1992年1月至1996年12月与医院出院数据相关联的癌症登记信息。采用多水平逻辑回归对二元结局进行建模,即患者在首次入住任何医院后的6个月内是否接受了化疗。结果显示,首次入住“非癌症”医院的患者接受化疗的可能性不到首次入住癌症科室或癌症中心患者的一半(比值比=0.28)。这一结果无法用首次入住医院与最近癌症中心之间的距离来解释,也无法用年龄增长或病情严重程度来解释。该研究涵盖了苏格兰引入卡尔曼 - 海因报告之前的时期,应作为未来监测专科护理可及性的基线。