Cilione Carmela, Lorenzi Cristina, Dell Orso Daniela, Garuti Giancarlo, Rossi Giuseppina, Totaro Lina, Clini Enrico
Fondazione CdC Villa Pineta Division of Pneumology & Pulmonary Rehabilitation, University of Modena-Reggio Emilia, Pavullo (MO), Italy.
Med Sci Monit. 2002 Nov;8(11):CR740-5.
In order to evaluate the factors associated with change in exercise capacity after comprehensive inpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation (IPR) we studied 132 consecutive adults with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) recovering from an acute exacerbation.
MATERIAL/METHODS: Lung function, arterial blood gases, and respiratory muscle strength were measured at baseline. Perceived breathlessness (B), 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), dyspnea at rest and post-exertion (D), hospital anxiety and depression (HAD), and health-related quality of life were assessed before (T0) and after (T1) IPR. The patients were divided into two groups depending on the change in 6MWD: Improvers (IM at least +54 meters after IPR, n=81) or Non-Improvers (NIM, less than 54 meters or no change, n=51).
At T1 61% of the patients showed improvement as here defined. The IM group showed lower 6MWD and higher B and resting-D at T0 than NIM (p<0.05). A stepwise multiple regression analysis was performed using 6MWD change as the dependent variable. and anthropometric and physiological measures at T0 as the independent variables. This regression model explained 26% of the 6MWD-change; 6MWD and PaO2 significantly contributed to this model.
In COPD patients recovering from an acute exacerbation, the predicted change in exercise capacity using anthropometric, demographic, clinical, and physiological variables after 2 weeks of comprehensive IPR is likely to be low. The baseline level of exercise performance and arterial oxygenation show the most consistent correlation with change in walking ability in these patients.
为了评估综合住院肺康复(IPR)后运动能力变化的相关因素,我们研究了132例连续的从急性加重期恢复的慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)成人患者。
材料/方法:在基线时测量肺功能、动脉血气和呼吸肌力量。在IPR之前(T0)和之后(T1)评估主观呼吸急促(B)、6分钟步行距离(6MWD)、静息和运动后呼吸困难(D)、医院焦虑抑郁量表(HAD)以及健康相关生活质量。根据6MWD的变化将患者分为两组:改善组(IPR后至少增加54米,n = 81)或未改善组(NIM,增加少于54米或无变化,n = 51)。
在T1时,61%的患者如上述定义显示出改善。改善组在T0时的6MWD低于未改善组,B和静息D高于未改善组(p<0.05)。以6MWD变化作为因变量,T0时的人体测量和生理指标作为自变量进行逐步多元回归分析。该回归模型解释了6MWD变化的26%;6MWD和动脉血氧分压(PaO2)对该模型有显著贡献。
在从急性加重期恢复的COPD患者中,综合IPR 2周后使用人体测量、人口统计学、临床和生理变量预测的运动能力变化可能较低。这些患者的运动表现基线水平和动脉氧合与步行能力变化显示出最一致的相关性。