Munkarah A R, Jhingran A, Iyer R B, Wallace S, Eifel P J, Gershenson D, Burke T W
Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2002 Nov-Dec;12(6):755-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1438.2002.t01-1-01150.x.
Our objective was to assess the value of lymphangiography in selecting patients for surgical staging of locally advanced cervical cancer. We reviewed our computerized database to identify patients with cervical cancer who had abnormal findings on lymphangiography and underwent retroperitoneal lymph node dissection between September 1991 and January 1996. The records of these patients were retrospectively reviewed, and the following data were retrieved: clinical tumor stage and findings on lymphangiography at surgery, and on pathologic examination of resected lymph nodes. The lymphangiograms were reviewed and reinterpreted in blinded fashion by two of the authors. The positive and negative predictive values of lymphangiography for the presence of lymph node metastases were calculated, with findings on pathologic examination of lymph nodes used as the gold standard. The positive and negative predictive values of surgeons' clinical assessments at surgery were also calculated. Fifty patients met the selection criteria and constituted the study population. Fourteen patients (28%) had histologically negative nodes, and 36 patients (72%) had lymph node metastases. Thirty-three patients had metastases to pelvic nodes, 1515 patients had metastases to common iliac nodes, and 1616 patients had metastases to para-aortic nodes. The positive predictive value of lymphangiography for lymph node metastases was 74% for pelvic nodes, 73% for common iliac nodes, and 88% for para-aortic nodes. The negative predictive value of lymphangiography for lymph node metastasis was 76% for common iliac nodes and 77% for para-aortic nodes. Overall, 46% of the patients selected for surgical exploration had histologic findings of either common iliac or para-aortic lymph node metastases; these findings led clinicians to extend radiation fields to cover the para-aortic lymph nodes. Lymphangiography is helpful in selecting patients with cervical cancer who have a high risk of common iliac or para-aortic lymph node metastasis. However, more accurate and more readily available noninvasive methods of evaluating cervical patients for the presence of regional disease continue to be needed.
我们的目的是评估淋巴管造影在为局部晚期宫颈癌患者选择手术分期时的价值。我们查阅了计算机数据库,以确定在1991年9月至1996年1月期间淋巴管造影有异常发现并接受腹膜后淋巴结清扫术的宫颈癌患者。对这些患者的记录进行了回顾性分析,并获取了以下数据:临床肿瘤分期、手术时淋巴管造影的结果以及切除淋巴结的病理检查结果。两位作者以盲法对淋巴管造影进行了复查和重新解读。以淋巴结病理检查结果作为金标准,计算淋巴管造影对淋巴结转移的阳性和阴性预测值。还计算了外科医生在手术时临床评估的阳性和阴性预测值。五十名患者符合入选标准,构成了研究人群。十四名患者(28%)组织学检查淋巴结阴性,三十六名患者(72%)有淋巴结转移。三十三例患者盆腔淋巴结转移,十五例患者髂总淋巴结转移,十六例患者腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移。淋巴管造影对盆腔淋巴结转移的阳性预测值为74%,对髂总淋巴结转移为73%,对腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移为88%。淋巴管造影对淋巴结转移的阴性预测值,对髂总淋巴结为76%,对腹主动脉旁淋巴结为77%。总体而言,被选进行手术探查的患者中有46%组织学检查发现髂总或腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移;这些发现促使临床医生扩大放疗范围以覆盖腹主动脉旁淋巴结。淋巴管造影有助于选择有髂总或腹主动脉旁淋巴结转移高风险宫颈癌患者。然而,仍需要更准确、更易于获得的非侵入性方法来评估宫颈癌患者是否存在区域疾病。