Suppr超能文献

癫痫的过度治疗:不良后果及机制

Overtreatment in epilepsy: adverse consequences and mechanisms.

作者信息

Perucca Emilio

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine and Therapeutics, Clinical Pharmacology Unit, University of Pavia, Piazza Botta 10, 27100, Pavia, Italy.

出版信息

Epilepsy Res. 2002 Nov;52(1):25-33. doi: 10.1016/s0920-1211(02)00182-1.

Abstract

The most important determinant of quality of life in patients with epilepsy is complete seizure control, and therefore this should be the ultimate goal of pharmacological therapy. Seizure freedom, or a reduction in seizure frequency, however, should not be sought at all costs, and the situation should never arise where a person with epilepsy is made to suffer more from the side effects of treatment than from the consequences of the underlying disease. Overtreatment is not uncommon in patients taking antiepileptic drugs, and it may occur in many forms and with a variety of mechanisms. Long-term use (or continuation) of anticonvulsant therapy in situations where it is not indicated (e.g. in children with simple febrile seizures, or in non-epileptic seizure-free patients who underwent brain surgery) constitutes a blatant case of overtreatment. Other forms of overtreatment include the use of unnecessarily fast dose escalation rates, which may expose the patient to potentially serious or severe side effects, or the prescription of unnecessarily high maintenance dosages. The latter occurrence may result from inadequate understanding of dose-response relationships, from misinterpretation of serum drug concentrations (e.g. targeting concentrations within the 'range' in patients who are well controlled at lower concentrations) or, at times, from failure to recognize a paradoxical increase in seizure frequency as a manifestation of drug toxicity. The most common form of overtreatment, however, involves the unnecessary use of combination therapy (polypharmacy) in patients who could be treated optimally with a single drug. Adverse effects associated with polypharmacy often result from undesirable drug-drug interactions. While pharmacokinetic interactions are somewhat predictable and can be minimized or controlled by monitoring serum drug concentrations and/or dose adjustment, pharmacodynamic interactions leading to enhanced neurotoxicity (as seen, for example, in some patients given a combination of lamotrigine and carbamazepine) can only be identified by careful clinical observation. There is evidence that not all antiepileptic drug combinations are equally adverse, and that the combined use of specific drugs (e.g. lamotrigine and valproic acid) may even exhibit an improved therapeutic index compared with either agent given alone, provided appropriate dose adjustments are made. Although the suggestion has been made that adverse effects are more likely to result from combining anticonvulsants having a similar mode of action, our knowledge of the pharmacology of individual agents is insufficient to allow a reliable prediction of the clinical effects of specific drug combinations.

摘要

癫痫患者生活质量的最重要决定因素是完全控制癫痫发作,因此这应该是药物治疗的最终目标。然而,不应不惜一切代价追求无癫痫发作或降低癫痫发作频率,绝不应出现癫痫患者因治疗副作用而比潜在疾病后果遭受更多痛苦的情况。接受抗癫痫药物治疗的患者中过度治疗并不罕见,它可能以多种形式出现,有多种机制。在无指征的情况下长期使用(或持续使用)抗惊厥治疗(例如在单纯热性惊厥的儿童中,或在接受脑手术且无癫痫发作的非癫痫患者中)构成明显的过度治疗案例。其他过度治疗形式包括使用不必要的快速剂量递增率,这可能使患者面临潜在的严重副作用,或开具不必要的高维持剂量。后一种情况可能是由于对剂量 - 反应关系理解不足、对血清药物浓度的错误解读(例如在较低浓度下病情得到良好控制的患者中以“范围”内的浓度为目标),或者有时是由于未能认识到癫痫发作频率的反常增加是药物毒性的表现。然而,最常见的过度治疗形式是在可以用单一药物最佳治疗的患者中不必要地使用联合治疗(多药联用)。多药联用相关的不良反应通常源于不良的药物相互作用。虽然药代动力学相互作用在一定程度上是可预测的,可以通过监测血清药物浓度和/或调整剂量来最小化或控制,但导致神经毒性增强的药效学相互作用(例如在一些同时服用拉莫三嗪和卡马西平的患者中所见)只能通过仔细的临床观察来识别。有证据表明并非所有抗癫痫药物组合的不良影响都是相同的,如果进行适当的剂量调整,特定药物(例如拉莫三嗪和丙戊酸)的联合使用甚至可能比单独使用任何一种药物表现出更好的治疗指数。尽管有人提出具有相似作用方式的抗惊厥药物联合使用更可能产生不良反应,但我们对个体药物药理学的了解不足以可靠地预测特定药物组合的临床效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验