Hein Katherine D, Mulliken John B, Kozakewich Harry P W, Upton Joseph, Burrows Patricia E
Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Dec;110(7):1625-35. doi: 10.1097/01.PRS.0000033021.60657.74.
Intramuscular venous malformations are often mistaken for tumors because of a similar presentation and improper nomenclature. This is a review of 176 patients with venous malformations localized to skeletal muscle compiled from the Vascular Anomalies Center at Children's Hospital from 1980 through 1999. The female-to-male ratio was 2:1. Two-thirds of skeletal muscle venous malformations were noted at birth; the remainder manifested in childhood and adolescence. Venous malformations occurred in every muscle group, most often in the head and neck and extremities. Pain and swelling were the usual presenting complaints. Skeletal problems, such as fracture, deformation, or growth abnormalities, were rare. Hormonal exacerbation and intralesional bleeding were infrequent. Magnetic resonance imaging showed the lesions to be isointense to surrounding muscle on T1-weighted sequences and hyperintense on T2-weighted images. Characteristic tubular or serpentine components were oriented along the muscular long axis. Thrombi were hyperintense on T1-weighted and hypointense on T2-weighted sequences; phleboliths were seen as signal voids on all sequences. Gross examination of resected specimens revealed multicolored tissue with dilated vascular channels, frequently containing phleboliths. Light microscopy showed aggregates of primarily medium-sized, thin-walled vascular channels with flat endothelium and variable smooth muscle, most closely resembling dysplastic veins. Three lesions had a different histologic appearance consisting predominantly of small vessels with capillary structure and proliferative activity admixed with large feeding and draining vessels, similar to a lesion called intramuscular capillary hemangioma in the literature. The endothelium in these three lesions was negative for glucose transporter-1 by immunostaining. Eight percent of the patients, who had minor or no symptoms, were not treated. Twenty-four percent of the patients were managed conservatively (with aspirin and compressive garments); for 17 of these patients (10 percent of 176), noninvasive therapy was not successful, and they proceeded to sclerotherapy, excision, or both. A total of 31 percent of the patients had sclerotherapy, 20 percent had excision, and 27 percent had combined sclerotherapy and excision. Sclerotherapy was used for diffuse lesions, except for those with multiple intralesional thromboses, neurologic impairment, or compressive signs and symptoms. Resection was preferred for venous malformations well localized to a single muscle or muscle group, particularly if the muscles are expendable. Therapeutic outcomes were recorded in the charts or obtained by telephone interview in 122 of the patients (69 percent). Of these, compression garment and aspirin, resection, sclerotherapy, or combined excision and sclerotherapy improved symptoms in 121 patients (92 percent); no change was noted in 10 patients (8 percent). Only one patient was worse (self-reported) after intervention.
由于表现相似且命名不当,肌内静脉畸形常被误诊为肿瘤。本文回顾了1980年至1999年期间儿童医院血管畸形中心收治的176例局限于骨骼肌的静脉畸形患者。男女比例为2:1。三分之二的骨骼肌静脉畸形在出生时就已被发现;其余的则在儿童期和青春期出现。静脉畸形可发生于每一个肌肉群,最常见于头颈部和四肢。疼痛和肿胀是常见的就诊主诉。骨骼问题,如骨折、变形或生长异常则较为罕见。激素加重和病灶内出血也不常见。磁共振成像显示,在T1加权序列上,病灶与周围肌肉等信号,在T2加权图像上呈高信号。特征性的管状或蜿蜒状成分沿肌肉长轴排列。血栓在T1加权序列上呈高信号,在T2加权序列上呈低信号;静脉石在所有序列上均表现为信号缺失。切除标本的大体检查显示为多色组织,血管腔扩张,常含有静脉石。光镜检查显示主要为中等大小、薄壁的血管腔聚集,内皮扁平,平滑肌可变,最类似于发育异常的静脉。有三个病灶具有不同的组织学表现,主要由具有毛细血管结构和增殖活性的小血管组成,并与大的供血和引流血管混合,类似于文献中所称的肌内毛细血管瘤。这三个病灶的内皮通过免疫染色显示葡萄糖转运蛋白-1为阴性。8%的症状轻微或无症状的患者未接受治疗。24%的患者采用保守治疗(服用阿司匹林和使用压迫性衣物);其中17例患者(占176例的10%)无创治疗无效,随后接受了硬化治疗、手术切除或两者联合治疗。共有31%的患者接受了硬化治疗,20%的患者接受了手术切除,27%的患者接受了硬化治疗与手术切除联合治疗。硬化治疗用于弥漫性病灶,但有多个病灶内血栓形成、神经功能障碍或有压迫体征和症状的患者除外。对于局限于单一肌肉或肌肉群的静脉畸形,尤其是那些肌肉可切除的情况,首选手术切除。122例患者(69%)的治疗结果记录在病历中或通过电话随访获得。其中,压迫性衣物和阿司匹林、手术切除、硬化治疗或手术切除与硬化治疗联合应用使121例患者(92%)的症状得到改善;10例患者(8%)症状无变化。只有1例患者在干预后病情恶化(自述)。