Friedrich E
Pollution Research Group, School of Chemical Engineering, University of Natal, Durban, South Africa.
Water Sci Technol. 2002;46(9):29-36.
The environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology was used in this study to calculate and compare the environmental burdens resulting from two different methods employed in the production of potable water in South Africa. One method employs conventional processes for the treatment of water and the other one is based on membrane filtration. All inputs (raw materials and energy) and outputs (products, by-products and emissions to air, water and soil) from the two methods were listed and quantified. These inputs and outputs cause different environmental impacts (global warming, ozone depletion, smog formation, acidification, nutrient enrichment, ecotoxicity and human toxicity) and the contribution of each method to each of these impact categories has been quantified, resulting in a score. The ISO (International Organisation for Standardisation) methodological framework for life cycle assessments guided this study. By using these methodologies and by tracing all the processes involved in the production of potable water to the interface with the environment, it was found that the main contributor to the overall environmental burden is the generation of electricity. This conclusion is valid for both methods investigated and in order to increase the environmental performance in the production of potable water the energy efficiency of waterworks should be increased.
本研究采用环境生命周期评估(LCA)方法,以计算和比较南非两种不同饮用水生产方法所产生的环境负担。一种方法采用传统的水处理工艺,另一种基于膜过滤。列出并量化了两种方法的所有输入(原材料和能源)和输出(产品、副产品以及向空气、水和土壤的排放)。这些输入和输出会造成不同的环境影响(全球变暖、臭氧层损耗、烟雾形成、酸化、营养物富集、生态毒性和人体毒性),并对每种方法在这些影响类别中的贡献进行了量化,得出一个分数。本研究以国际标准化组织(ISO)的生命周期评估方法框架为指导。通过使用这些方法,并追踪饮用水生产过程中与环境的所有接口,发现总体环境负担的主要贡献者是电力的产生。这一结论对于所研究的两种方法均有效,为提高饮用水生产的环境绩效,应提高水厂的能源效率。