• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在高保真驾驶模拟器中碰撞预警时机、驾驶员分心情况以及驾驶员对即将发生的追尾碰撞的反应

Collision warning timing, driver distraction, and driver response to imminent rear-end collisions in a high-fidelity driving simulator.

作者信息

Lee John D, McGehee Daniel V, Brown Timothy L, Reyes Michelle L

机构信息

Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52245, USA.

出版信息

Hum Factors. 2002 Summer;44(2):314-34. doi: 10.1518/0018720024497844.

DOI:10.1518/0018720024497844
PMID:12452276
Abstract

Rear-end collisions account for almost 30% of automotive crashes. Rear-end collision avoidance systems (RECASs) may offer a promising approach to help drivers avoid these crashes. Two experiments performed using a high-fidelity motion-based driving simulator examined driver responses to evaluate the efficacy of a RECAS. The first experiment showed that early warnings helped distracted drivers react more quickly--and thereby avoid more collisions--than did late warnings or no warnings. Compared with the no-warning condition, an early RECAS warning reduced the number of collisions by 80.7%. Assuming collision severity is proportional to kinetic energy, the early warning reduced collision severity by 96.5%. In contrast, the late warning reduced collisions by 50.0% and the corresponding severity by 87.5%. The second experiment showed that RECAS benefits even undistracted drivers. Analysis of the braking process showed that warnings provide a potential safety benefit by reducing the time required for drivers to release the accelerator. Warnings do not, however, speed application of the brake, increase maximum deceleration, or affect mean deceleration. These results provide the basis for a computational model of driver performance that was used to extrapolate the findings and identify the most promising parameter settings. Potential applications of these results include methods for evaluating collision warning systems, algorithm design guidance, and driver performance model input.

摘要

追尾碰撞事故几乎占汽车碰撞事故的30%。追尾碰撞避免系统(RECASs)可能提供一种很有前景的方法来帮助驾驶员避免此类碰撞事故。使用基于高保真运动的驾驶模拟器进行的两项实验研究了驾驶员的反应,以评估RECAS的有效性。第一个实验表明,与延迟警告或无警告相比,早期警告能帮助注意力分散的驾驶员更快做出反应,从而避免更多碰撞。与无警告情况相比,早期RECAS警告使碰撞次数减少了80.7%。假设碰撞严重程度与动能成正比,早期警告使碰撞严重程度降低了96.5%。相比之下,延迟警告使碰撞次数减少了50.0%,相应的严重程度降低了87.5%。第二个实验表明,RECAS对未分心的驾驶员也有益处。对制动过程的分析表明,警告通过减少驾驶员松开油门所需的时间提供了潜在的安全益处。然而,警告并不会加快刹车的应用速度、增加最大减速度或影响平均减速度。这些结果为驾驶员性能计算模型提供了基础,该模型用于推断研究结果并确定最有前景的参数设置。这些结果的潜在应用包括评估碰撞警告系统的方法、算法设计指导和驾驶员性能模型输入。

相似文献

1
Collision warning timing, driver distraction, and driver response to imminent rear-end collisions in a high-fidelity driving simulator.在高保真驾驶模拟器中碰撞预警时机、驾驶员分心情况以及驾驶员对即将发生的追尾碰撞的反应
Hum Factors. 2002 Summer;44(2):314-34. doi: 10.1518/0018720024497844.
2
A comparison of tactile, visual, and auditory warnings for rear-end collision prevention in simulated driving.模拟驾驶中用于预防追尾碰撞的触觉、视觉和听觉警告的比较。
Hum Factors. 2008 Apr;50(2):264-75. doi: 10.1518/001872008X250674.
3
Brake reactions of distracted drivers to pedestrian Forward Collision Warning systems.分心驾驶员对行人前碰撞预警系统的制动反应。
J Safety Res. 2017 Jun;61:23-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.02.002. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
4
An electrophysiological study of the impact of a Forward Collision Warning System in a simulator driving task.一项关于前向碰撞预警系统在模拟器驾驶任务中影响的电生理学研究。
Brain Res. 2012 Aug 27;1470:69-79. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2012.06.027. Epub 2012 Jul 2.
5
Adaptive forward collision warnings: The impact of imperfect technology on behavioral adaptation, warning effectiveness and acceptance.自适应前向碰撞警告:不完美技术对行为适应、警告有效性和接受度的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Jul;128:217-229. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.04.012. Epub 2019 May 4.
6
A rear-end collision risk assessment model based on drivers' collision avoidance process under influences of cell phone use and gender-A driving simulator based study.基于手机使用和性别影响下驾驶员避撞过程的追尾碰撞风险评估模型——一项基于驾驶模拟器的研究
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Dec;97:1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.08.021. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
7
Assessing the effectiveness of "intuitive" vibrotactile warning signals in preventing front-to-rear-end collisions in a driving simulator.评估“直观”振动触觉警示信号在驾驶模拟器中预防前后端碰撞的有效性。
Accid Anal Prev. 2006 Sep;38(5):988-96. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.04.002. Epub 2006 May 11.
8
Practice makes better - Learning effects of driving with a multi-stage collision warning.练习造就完美——带有多阶段碰撞预警系统的驾驶学习效果。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Aug;117:398-409. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.01.018. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
9
Driver reaction time to tactile and auditory rear-end collision warnings while talking on a cell phone.在使用手机通话时,驾驶员对触觉和听觉追尾碰撞警告的反应时间。
Hum Factors. 2009 Feb;51(1):102-10. doi: 10.1177/0018720809333517.
10
Driving with a partially autonomous forward collision warning system: how do drivers react?驾驶配备部分自主式前方碰撞预警系统的汽车:驾驶员的反应如何?
Hum Factors. 2012 Oct;54(5):698-708. doi: 10.1177/0018720812439712.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Experienced and Novice Drivers' Visual and Driving Behaviors during Warned or Unwarned Near-Forward Collisions.有经验和新手驾驶员在有预警或无预警的近前方碰撞过程中的视觉与驾驶行为比较
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Sep 28;23(19):8150. doi: 10.3390/s23198150.
2
Understanding the domain of driving distraction with knowledge graphs.利用知识图谱理解驾驶分心领域。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 9;17(12):e0278822. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278822. eCollection 2022.
3
A Simulation-Based Study of the Effect of Brake Light Flashing Frequency on Driver Brake Behavior from the Perspective of Response Time.
基于响应时间视角的刹车灯闪烁频率对驾驶员制动行为影响的模拟研究
Behav Sci (Basel). 2022 Sep 14;12(9):332. doi: 10.3390/bs12090332.
4
Car drivers coping with hazardous events in real versus simulated situations: Declarative, behavioral and physiological data used to assess drivers' feeling of presence.驾驶员在真实与模拟环境下应对危险事件的比较:用于评估驾驶员存在感的数据(描述性、行为和生理)。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 19;16(2):e0247373. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247373. eCollection 2021.
5
Driving Performance and Technology Acceptance Evaluation in Real Traffic of a Smartphone-Based Driver Assistance System.基于智能手机的驾驶员辅助系统在实际交通中的驾驶性能和技术接受度评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 28;17(19):7098. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197098.
6
A Comparative Study of Accident Risk Related to Speech-Based and Handheld Texting during a Sudden Braking Event in Urban Road Environments.城市道路环境中突发制动事件中基于语音和手持输入的事故风险比较研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 6;17(16):5675. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165675.
7
The Challenges of Partially Automated Driving.部分自动驾驶的挑战
Commun ACM. 2016 Apr;59(5):70-77. doi: 10.1145/2830565. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
8
Mobile Phone Use in a Car-Following Situation: Impact on Time Headway and Effectiveness of Driver's Rear-End Risk Compensation Behavior via a Driving Simulator Study.在跟车情境中使用手机:通过驾驶模拟器研究对时间车头间距和驾驶员追尾风险补偿行为效果的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 19;17(4):1328. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041328.
9
A Driver's Physiology Sensor-Based Driving Risk Prediction Method for Lane-Changing Process Using Hidden Markov Model.一种基于驾驶员生理传感器的使用隐马尔可夫模型的变道过程驾驶风险预测方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Jun 13;19(12):2670. doi: 10.3390/s19122670.
10
Fine-tuning ADAS algorithm parameters for optimizing traffic safety and mobility in connected vehicle environment.在联网车辆环境中微调高级驾驶辅助系统(ADAS)算法参数以优化交通安全与机动性。
Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol. 2017 Mar;76:132-149. doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2017.01.003.