• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在跟车情境中使用手机:通过驾驶模拟器研究对时间车头间距和驾驶员追尾风险补偿行为效果的影响。

Mobile Phone Use in a Car-Following Situation: Impact on Time Headway and Effectiveness of Driver's Rear-End Risk Compensation Behavior via a Driving Simulator Study.

机构信息

School of Automobile, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, China.

School of mechanical engineering, Hubei University of Arts and Science, Xiangyang 441053, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 19;17(4):1328. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041328.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17041328
PMID:32092914
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7068547/
Abstract

Mobile phone use while driving has become one of the leading causes of traffic accidents and poses a significant threat to public health. This study investigated the impact of speech-based texting and handheld texting (two difficulty levels in each task) on car-following performance in terms of time headway and collision avoidance capability; and further examined the relationship between time headway increase strategy and the corresponding accident frequency. Fifty-three participants completed the car-following experiment in a driving simulator. A Generalized Estimating Equation method was applied to develop the linear regression model for time headway and the binary logistic regression model for accident probability. The results of the model for time headway indicated that drivers adopted compensation behavior to offset the increased workload by increasing their time headway by 0.41 and 0.59 s while conducting speech-based texting and handheld texting, respectively. The model results for the rear-end accident probability showed that the accident probability increased by 2.34 and 3.56 times, respectively, during the use of speech-based texting and handheld texting tasks. Additionally, the greater the deceleration of the lead vehicle, the higher the probability of a rear-end accident. Further, the relationship between time headway increase patterns and the corresponding accident frequencies showed that all drivers' compensation behaviors were different, and only a few drivers increased their time headway by 60% or more, which could completely offset the increased accident risk associated with mobile phone distraction. The findings provide a theoretical reference for the formulation of traffic regulations related to mobile phone use, driver safety education programs, and road safety public awareness campaigns. Moreover, the developed accident risk models may contribute to the development of a driving safety warning system.

摘要

开车时使用手机已成为交通事故的主要原因之一,对公众健康构成重大威胁。本研究探讨了基于语音的文本输入和手持设备文本输入(每个任务有两个难度级别)对跟车性能(时距和避撞能力)的影响;并进一步研究了时距增加策略与相应事故频率之间的关系。53 名参与者在驾驶模拟器中完成了跟车实验。采用广义估计方程方法建立了线性回归模型来预测时距,建立二项逻辑回归模型来预测事故概率。时距模型的结果表明,驾驶员分别通过增加 0.41 和 0.59 秒的时距来补偿基于语音的文本输入和手持设备文本输入任务增加的工作负荷。追尾事故概率模型的结果表明,在使用基于语音的文本输入和手持设备文本输入任务时,事故概率分别增加了 2.34 倍和 3.56 倍。此外,前车减速越大,追尾事故的概率越高。此外,时距增加模式与相应事故频率之间的关系表明,所有驾驶员的补偿行为都不同,只有少数驾驶员将时距增加 60%或更多,这可以完全抵消与手机分心相关的增加的事故风险。研究结果为制定与手机使用相关的交通规则、驾驶员安全教育计划和道路安全公众意识运动提供了理论参考。此外,开发的事故风险模型可能有助于开发驾驶安全预警系统。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dbc/7068547/874b7273a3ec/ijerph-17-01328-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dbc/7068547/979cdd2029d8/ijerph-17-01328-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dbc/7068547/7c4c6a3dc6d0/ijerph-17-01328-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dbc/7068547/04e74d7f6cc0/ijerph-17-01328-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dbc/7068547/874b7273a3ec/ijerph-17-01328-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dbc/7068547/979cdd2029d8/ijerph-17-01328-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dbc/7068547/7c4c6a3dc6d0/ijerph-17-01328-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dbc/7068547/04e74d7f6cc0/ijerph-17-01328-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1dbc/7068547/874b7273a3ec/ijerph-17-01328-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Mobile Phone Use in a Car-Following Situation: Impact on Time Headway and Effectiveness of Driver's Rear-End Risk Compensation Behavior via a Driving Simulator Study.在跟车情境中使用手机:通过驾驶模拟器研究对时间车头间距和驾驶员追尾风险补偿行为效果的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 19;17(4):1328. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041328.
2
A Comparative Study of Accident Risk Related to Speech-Based and Handheld Texting during a Sudden Braking Event in Urban Road Environments.城市道路环境中突发制动事件中基于语音和手持输入的事故风险比较研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 6;17(16):5675. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165675.
3
A rear-end collision risk assessment model based on drivers' collision avoidance process under influences of cell phone use and gender-A driving simulator based study.基于手机使用和性别影响下驾驶员避撞过程的追尾碰撞风险评估模型——一项基于驾驶模拟器的研究
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Dec;97:1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.08.021. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
4
Impact of mobile phone use on car-following behaviour of young drivers.手机使用对年轻驾驶员跟车行为的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Sep;82:10-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.05.001. Epub 2015 May 23.
5
Modelling braking behaviour of distracted young drivers in car-following interactions: A grouped random parameters duration model with heterogeneity-in-means.跟车交互中分心年轻驾驶员制动行为建模:一种均值异质性分组随机参数持续时间模型
Accid Anal Prev. 2023 Jun;185:107015. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107015. Epub 2023 Mar 6.
6
Impact of texting on young drivers' behavior and safety on urban and rural roads through a simulation experiment.通过模拟实验研究短信对城乡年轻驾驶员驾驶行为和安全的影响。
J Safety Res. 2014 Jun;49:25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2014.02.008. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
7
Mobile phone use during driving: Effects on speed and effectiveness of driver compensatory behaviour.驾驶过程中使用手机:对驾驶员补偿行为的速度和有效性的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Sep;106:370-378. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.06.021. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
8
Effects of peripheral transverse line markings on drivers' speed and headway choice and crash risk in car-following: A naturalistic observation study.跟驰中周边横向标线对驾驶员速度和车头时距选择及碰撞风险的影响:一项自然观察研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Oct;146:105701. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105701. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
9
Analysis of effects of driver's evasive action time on rear-end collision risk using a driving simulator.利用驾驶模拟器分析驾驶员回避时间对追尾碰撞风险的影响。
J Safety Res. 2021 Sep;78:242-250. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2021.06.001. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
10
Texting while driving: is speech-based text entry less risky than handheld text entry?开车时发短信:基于语音的文本输入是否比手持文本输入风险更低?
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Nov;72:287-95. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.07.014. Epub 2014 Aug 2.

引用本文的文献

1
ERP insights into speed control: role of risk types and levels.事件相关电位对速度控制的见解:风险类型和水平的作用。
BMC Psychol. 2025 Mar 8;13(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-02555-w.
2
Texting While Driving: A Literature Review on Driving Simulator Studies.文本驾驶:驾驶模拟器研究文献综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 28;20(5):4354. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20054354.
3
An Emergency Driving Intervention System Designed for Driver Disability Scenarios Based on Emergency Risk Field.基于紧急风险场的驾驶员残疾场景应急驾驶干预系统设计。

本文引用的文献

1
"Mate! I'm running 10 min late": An investigation into the self-regulation of mobile phone tasks while driving.“伙计!我要晚到 10 分钟”:对驾驶时手机任务自我调节的调查。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Jan;122:134-142. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.09.020. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
2
The driver-level crash risk associated with daily cellphone use and cellphone use while driving.日常使用手机和开车时使用手机与驾驶员层面碰撞风险的关系。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Oct;119:149-154. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.07.007. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
3
Risk Perceptions of Cellphone Use While Driving: Results from a Delphi Survey.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 27;20(3):2278. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032278.
4
Talking on the Phone While Driving: A Literature Review on Driving Simulator Studies.边开车边打电话:驾驶模拟器研究文献综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 24;19(17):10554. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710554.
5
Computer-Aided Detection False Positives in Colonoscopy.结肠镜检查中的计算机辅助检测假阳性
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Jun 18;11(6):1113. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11061113.
6
A Comparative Study of Accident Risk Related to Speech-Based and Handheld Texting during a Sudden Braking Event in Urban Road Environments.城市道路环境中突发制动事件中基于语音和手持输入的事故风险比较研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Aug 6;17(16):5675. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17165675.
驾驶时使用手机的风险感知:德尔菲调查结果。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 May 25;15(6):1074. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15061074.
4
Driving behaviour while self-regulating mobile phone interactions: A human-machine system approach.自我调节手机互动时的驾驶行为:人机系统方法。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Sep;118:253-262. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.020. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
5
Examining vehicle operating speeds on rural two-lane curves using naturalistic driving data.利用自然驾驶数据检验农村双车道曲线的车辆运行速度。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Sep;118:236-243. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.017. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
6
Using SHRP 2 naturalistic driving data to assess drivers' speed choice while being engaged in different secondary tasks.使用SHRP 2自然驾驶数据评估驾驶员在进行不同次要任务时的速度选择。
J Safety Res. 2017 Sep;62:33-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2017.04.004. Epub 2017 May 6.
7
Risk factors of mobile phone use while driving in Queensland: Prevalence, attitudes, crash risk perception, and task-management strategies.昆士兰地区驾车时使用手机的风险因素:流行程度、态度、撞车风险认知及任务管理策略。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 6;12(9):e0183361. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183361. eCollection 2017.
8
Mobile phone use during driving: Effects on speed and effectiveness of driver compensatory behaviour.驾驶过程中使用手机:对驾驶员补偿行为的速度和有效性的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Sep;106:370-378. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.06.021. Epub 2017 Jul 14.
9
Effects of road infrastructure and traffic complexity in speed adaptation behaviour of distracted drivers.道路基础设施和交通复杂性对分心驾驶者速度适应行为的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Apr;101:67-77. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.01.018. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
10
Self-regulation of driving speed among distracted drivers: An application of driver behavioral adaptation theory.分心驾驶者的行驶速度自我调节:驾驶员行为适应理论的应用
Traffic Inj Prev. 2017 Aug 18;18(6):599-605. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1278628. Epub 2017 Jan 17.