Suppr超能文献

[一项干预措施对某健康区域医学专科候诊名单的影响]

[Impact of an intervention on the waiting-list for medical specialists in a health area].

作者信息

Cano Montoro J G, Medina Ferrer E, Custardoy Olavarrieta J, Pineda Cuenca M, Orozco Beltrán D, Quirce Andrés F

机构信息

Centro de Salud de Orihuela. Grupo de Investigación Clínica del Sureste (GICS). Orihuela (Alicante). España.

出版信息

Aten Primaria. 2002 Nov 30;30(9):549-55. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(02)79104-x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact on waiting-lists and waiting time of an intervention that modified the appointment system in specialist out-patients.

DESIGN

Intervention study. Intervention group, medical specialists (MS); and control group, surgical specialists (SS). Comparison of variables. Analysis at one year (1997) and at two years (1998) of the intervention in the two groups.Setting. Area 20 of the health board for the Community of Valencia, a Southern county in the province of Alicante, which had 12 health districts and included specialist care.

PARTICIPANTS

The first-visit diary for medical and surgical specialist clinics.Interventions. Redistribution of MS first visits in proportion with the population over 14 by areas. Health centre self-management of specialist appointments. Introduction of visits of choice and second-visit re-scheduling from specialist care. Introduction of clinical protocols for action and referral.

MEASUREMENTS

Referral percentage. Patients seen in primary care and at medical and surgical specialist clinics. Days waiting to be seen by a specialist. Patients on waiting list. Index of waiting for consultations.

RESULTS

Referral ranged between 5.1% and 5.8%. There was a significant drop (P<.05) in the mean number of days an MS patient had to wait vs the SS (37 vs 48 in 1997 and 34 vs 50 in 1998), and in the number of MS consultations being waited for. There was a significant difference in the index of waiting for a consultation (P<.05) in favour of MS (17.74 vs 25.45 in 1997, and 16.77 vs 34.92).

CONCLUSIONS

The intervention optimised specialist medical health care in terms of the number of consultations and reduction of waiting time, with an improvement of these variables against SS.

摘要

目的

评估一项改变专科门诊预约系统的干预措施对候诊名单和等待时间的影响。

设计

干预性研究。干预组为内科专科医生(MS);对照组为外科专科医生(SS)。对变量进行比较。在干预实施一年(1997年)和两年(1998年)时对两组进行分析。地点。位于阿利坎特省南部的巴伦西亚自治区卫生委员会第20区,该地区有12个卫生区,提供专科护理服务。

参与者

内科和外科专科门诊的初诊日志。干预措施。按地区将内科专科医生的初诊重新分配,使其与14岁以上人口比例相匹配。由健康中心自行管理专科预约。引入自主选择就诊和从专科护理重新安排复诊时间。引入行动和转诊的临床方案。

测量指标

转诊百分比。在初级保健机构以及内科和外科专科门诊就诊的患者。等待专科医生诊治的天数。候诊名单上的患者。会诊等待指数。

结果

转诊率在5.1%至5.8%之间。与外科专科医生组相比,内科专科医生组患者平均等待天数显著下降(P<0.05)(1997年为37天对48天,1998年为34天对50天),等待内科会诊的数量也显著下降。会诊等待指数存在显著差异(P<0.05),内科专科医生组更具优势(1997年为17.74对25.45,1998年为16.77对34.92)。

结论

该干预措施在会诊数量和等待时间减少方面优化了专科医疗保健,与外科专科医生组相比,这些变量得到了改善。

相似文献

1
[Impact of an intervention on the waiting-list for medical specialists in a health area].
Aten Primaria. 2002 Nov 30;30(9):549-55. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(02)79104-x.
2
[Analysis of a programme of direct referral between primary and specialist care in potential surgery patients].
Aten Primaria. 2001 Oct 15;28(6):381-5. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(01)70399-x.
3
[Identification of variables influencing waiting times for specialized care].
Gac Sanit. 2003 Sep-Oct;17(5):368-74. doi: 10.1016/s0213-9111(03)71772-5.
6
[Waiting list in a public health facility in Santiago, Chile].
Medwave. 2014 Jul 23;14(6):e6000. doi: 10.5867/medwave.2014.06.6000.
7
Specialist outreach clinics in Sheffield: a faster tier of out-patient provision for the patients of fundholding GPs?
J Public Health Med. 1997 Sep;19(3):347-53. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubmed.a024642.
9
Specialist outreach clinics in general practice.
BMJ. 1994 Apr 23;308(6936):1083-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6936.1083.
10
Waiting time for specialist consultation in Tehran.
Arch Iran Med. 2012 Dec;15(12):756-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Study Protocol on Social Return on Investment (SROI) Project of the Surgical Waiting List Management System.
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Mar 10;11(6):825. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11060825.
2
Interventions to reduce waiting times for elective procedures.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 23;2015(2):CD005610. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005610.pub2.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient referral to a university clinic: pattarns in a rural state.
Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1960 Oct;50(10):1493-507. doi: 10.2105/ajph.50.10.1493.
2
[The relationship between primary and specialized care].
Aten Primaria. 1997 Jun 15;20(1):25-32.
3
[Relationship between health care levels].
Aten Primaria. 1996 Mar 15;17(4):239-40.
8
[The referral of patients from primary to specialized care].
Gac Sanit. 1988 Nov-Dec;2(9):271-5. doi: 10.1016/s0213-9111(88)70939-5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验