Suppr超能文献

内含子剪接如何影响黑腹果蝇中的缺失和插入图谱。

How intron splicing affects the deletion and insertion profile in Drosophila melanogaster.

作者信息

Ptak Susan E, Petrov Dmitri A

机构信息

Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, California 94305, USA.

出版信息

Genetics. 2002 Nov;162(3):1233-44. doi: 10.1093/genetics/162.3.1233.

Abstract

Studies of "dead-on-arrival" transposable elements in Drosophila melanogaster found that deletions outnumber insertions approximately 8:1 with a median size for deletions of approximately 10 bp. These results are consistent with the deletion and insertion profiles found in most other Drosophila pseudogenes. In contrast, a recent study of D. melanogaster introns found a deletion/insertion ratio of 1.35:1, with 84% of deletions being shorter than 10 bp. This discrepancy could be explained if deletions, especially long deletions, are more frequently strongly deleterious than insertions and are eliminated disproportionately from intron sequences. To test this possibility, we use analysis and simulations to examine how deletions and insertions of different lengths affect different components of splicing and determine the distribution of deletions and insertions that preserve the original exons. We find that, consistent with our predictions, longer deletions affect splicing at a much higher rate compared to insertions and short deletions. We also explore other potential constraints in introns and show that most of these also disproportionately affect large deletions. Altogether we demonstrate that constraints in introns may explain much of the difference in the pattern of deletions and insertions observed in Drosophila introns and pseudogenes.

摘要

对黑腹果蝇中“到达即死亡”的转座元件的研究发现,缺失的数量比插入多,比例约为8:1,缺失的中位数大小约为10个碱基对。这些结果与在大多数其他果蝇假基因中发现的缺失和插入图谱一致。相比之下,最近一项对黑腹果蝇内含子的研究发现,缺失/插入比例为1.35:1,84%的缺失短于10个碱基对。如果缺失,尤其是长缺失,比插入更频繁地具有强烈的有害性,并从内含子序列中不成比例地被消除,那么这种差异就可以得到解释。为了检验这种可能性,我们使用分析和模拟来研究不同长度的缺失和插入如何影响剪接的不同组成部分,并确定保留原始外显子的缺失和插入的分布。我们发现,与我们的预测一致,与插入和短缺失相比,长缺失对剪接的影响频率要高得多。我们还探索了内含子中的其他潜在限制,并表明其中大多数也不成比例地影响大的缺失。我们总体证明,内含子中的限制可能解释了在果蝇内含子和假基因中观察到的缺失和插入模式差异的大部分原因。

相似文献

2
Selective constraints on intron evolution in Drosophila.果蝇内含子进化的选择限制
Genetics. 2003 Dec;165(4):1843-51. doi: 10.1093/genetics/165.4.1843.
9
Intron loss and gain in Drosophila.果蝇中的内含子缺失与获得
Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Dec;24(12):2842-50. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msm235. Epub 2007 Oct 27.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Mutational equilibrium model of genome size evolution.基因组大小进化的突变平衡模型。
Theor Popul Biol. 2002 Jun;61(4):531-44. doi: 10.1006/tpbi.2002.1605.
4
Controlling the efficiency of excision repair.控制切除修复的效率。
Mutat Res. 2001 Feb 25;485(1):3-13. doi: 10.1016/s0921-8777(00)00071-9.
5
Genomic gigantism: DNA loss is slow in mountain grasshoppers.基因组巨大化:山区蝗虫的DNA丢失速度缓慢。
Mol Biol Evol. 2001 Feb;18(2):246-53. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003798.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验