Andersen M Robyn, Hager Michelle, Su Celina, Urban Nicole
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA.
Health Educ Behav. 2002 Dec;29(6):755-70. doi: 10.1177/109019802237942.
The Community Trial of Breast Cancer Screening Promotion assessed the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of mammography promotion by community volunteer groups in rural areas using three different intervention approaches: individual counseling, community activities, and a combined intervention including both. Societal costs of the interventions were calculated and used in conjunction with measures of effectiveness to calculate cost-effectiveness in terms of cost per additional mammogram and cost per year of life saved. Methods of collecting and using cost information to assess the cost-effectiveness of community interventions are described. The Community Activities intervention was found to be the most cost-effective, at approximately $2,000 for each additional regular mammography user in the community. The cost per year of life saved associated with mammography promotion was approximately $56,000 per year of life saved. Exploratory analyses suggest that the most cost-effective method of promoting mammography use may vary with the target population.
乳腺癌筛查推广社区试验评估了农村地区社区志愿者团体采用三种不同干预方法(个体咨询、社区活动以及二者结合的综合干预)进行乳房X光检查推广的有效性和成本效益。计算了干预措施的社会成本,并结合有效性指标,以每增加一次乳房X光检查的成本和每挽救一年生命的成本来计算成本效益。描述了收集和使用成本信息以评估社区干预措施成本效益的方法。结果发现,社区活动干预最为划算,社区中每新增一名定期接受乳房X光检查的用户,成本约为2000美元。与乳房X光检查推广相关的每挽救一年生命的成本约为每年56000美元。探索性分析表明,推广乳房X光检查使用的最具成本效益的方法可能因目标人群而异。