Cognet J M, Fabre T, Durandeau A
Service de Traumatologie, Hôpital de Hautepierre, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, 67098 Strasbourg, France.
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2002 Nov;88(7):655-62.
Radial palsy is a serious complication of humeral shaft fractures. The risk results from the anatomic position of the radial nerve which turns around the distal portion of the humeral shaft, in contact with the bone. As a rule, radial palsy regresses spontaneously, but in a few cases surgery may be required to achieve neurological recovery. We conducted a retrospective study of thirty cases of radial palsy after humeral fracture treated surgically. Our objective was to define causes of non-recovery and assess therapeutic efficacy, searching for the characteristic features of the fractures involved.
We limited our analysis to post-humeral fracture radial palsies, which were operated due to the absence of neurological recovery. We recorded the type of fracture, treatment used to achieve bone healing, surgical approach, and type of radial nerve surgery. The series included 30 patients, predominantly male, mean age 38.4 years. The fractures were situated in the middle or lower third of the humeral shaft. Most were spiral fractures. Plate fixation (30%) or nailing (33%) were generally used for fixation. There were six cases of iatrogenic palsy, all after plate fixation. A revision procedure was required in one-third of the cases due to nonunion. Exploration of the radial nerve demonstrated compression at the intermuscular septum in one-third of the cases and a direct conflict with the fixation plate in one-fifth of the cases. Neurolysis was required in 23 cases, nerve grafts in five and first-intention tendon transfer in two.
Results of nerve surgery were assessed with the Alnot classification at a mean follow-up of 6.3 years. Outcome was rated good or very good in 22 patients, fair in one and poor (failure) in three. First-intention tendon transfers were performed in two patients and two patients were lost to follow-up. Mean delay to recovery was seven months after neurolysis and fifteen months after nerve grafts.
Our experience and data in the literature suggest that several factors could be involved in persistent radial palsy after humeral shaft fracture. The greatest risk of radial nerve injury or absence of recovery after the primary lesion is encountered after fracture of the lower third of the humerus, spiral fracture, and plate fixation. Particular features observed in our series were nonunion and compression in the intermuscular septum.
桡神经麻痹是肱骨干骨折的严重并发症。其风险源于桡神经在肱骨干远端环绕并与骨接触的解剖位置。通常,桡神经麻痹可自行恢复,但少数情况下可能需要手术以实现神经功能恢复。我们对30例肱骨骨折后接受手术治疗的桡神经麻痹病例进行了回顾性研究。我们的目的是确定神经功能未恢复的原因,评估治疗效果,并寻找所涉骨折的特征。
我们将分析限于肱骨骨折后因神经功能未恢复而接受手术的桡神经麻痹病例。我们记录了骨折类型、用于实现骨愈合的治疗方法、手术入路以及桡神经手术类型。该系列包括30例患者,以男性为主,平均年龄38.4岁。骨折位于肱骨干的中下段。大多数为螺旋骨折。一般采用钢板固定(30%)或髓内钉固定(33%)。有6例医源性麻痹,均发生在钢板固定后。三分之一的病例因骨不连需要进行翻修手术。三分之一的病例经桡神经探查发现肌间隔受压,五分之一的病例发现与固定板直接冲突。23例需要进行神经松解,5例需要神经移植,2例进行了一期肌腱转移。
在平均6.3年的随访中,采用阿尔诺分类法评估神经手术结果。22例患者结果评为良好或非常好,1例为中等,3例为差(失败)。2例患者进行了一期肌腱转移,2例患者失访。神经松解后平均恢复延迟为7个月,神经移植后为15个月。
我们的经验和文献数据表明,肱骨干骨折后持续性桡神经麻痹可能涉及多个因素。肱骨下段骨折、螺旋骨折和钢板固定后,桡神经损伤或原发损伤后神经功能未恢复的风险最大。我们系列中观察到的特殊特征是骨不连和肌间隔受压。