Suppr超能文献

可植入式隐形眼镜所致晶状体混浊及临床显著性白内障的发生率:两种镜片设计的比较

Incidence of lens opacities and clinically significant cataracts with the implantable contact lens: comparison of two lens designs.

作者信息

Sanders Donald R, Vukich John A

机构信息

Center for Clinical Research, Chicago, IL, USA.

出版信息

J Refract Surg. 2002 Nov-Dec;18(6):673-82. doi: 10.3928/1081-597X-20021101-03.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the incidence of anterior subcapsular lens opacities, clinically significant cataracts, secondary lens-related surgical reinterventions, and vaulting characteristics of the now discontinued V3 and currently used V4 Staar Surgical Implantable Contact Lens (ICL) phakic intraocular lens designs.

METHODS

In this non-randomized prospective clinical trial, 87 eyes were implanted with the V3 and 523 eyes with the V4 ICL as part of the U.S. FDA clinical trial for myopia. LOCS III assessment of lens opacities, clinically significant cataract, ICL vaulting (clearance between ICL and crystalline lens), and secondary ICL-related surgeries were the main outcome measures. Mean follow-up in the V3 series was 30.7 +/- 10.0 months (range 10.8 to 49.3 mo) and in the V4 series, 17.3 +/- 6.9 months (range 0.25 to 38.5 mo).

RESULTS

Incidence of anterior subcapsular opacities was significantly higher with the V3 vs. V4 ICL (12.6% vs. 2.9%, P<.001). The difference was largely due to the higher rate of late-appearing opacities (> or = 1 year after surgery; 9.2% vs. 0.6%, P<.001). The V3 group had a greater proportion of eyes with poor vault (23.6% vs. 4.3%, P<.001) and the presence of poor vault was highly associated with the development of late anterior subcapsular opacities (P<.001). Clinically significant cataract was more frequent in the V3 vs. V4 ICL (9.2% vs. 0.8%, P<.001), as was cataract extraction (6.9% vs. 0.2%, P<.001), and need for ICL replacement (5.7% vs. 1.1%, P<.001). Differences in opacity rate between the V3 and V4 designs were not due to differences in postoperative follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Implantation of the currently used V4 Staar Surgical model ICL resulted in significantly less anterior subcapsular opacities, clinically significant cataracts, and secondary ICL-related surgery.

摘要

目的

比较现已停产的V3和目前使用的V4 Staar Surgical可植入式接触镜(ICL)有晶状体眼人工晶状体设计的前囊下晶状体混浊、具有临床意义的白内障、与晶状体相关的二次手术再干预发生率以及拱高特征。

方法

在这项非随机前瞻性临床试验中,作为美国食品药品监督管理局近视临床试验的一部分,87只眼植入了V3 ICL,523只眼植入了V4 ICL。晶状体混浊的LOCS III评估、具有临床意义的白内障、ICL拱高(ICL与晶状体之间的间隙)以及与ICL相关的二次手术是主要观察指标。V3组的平均随访时间为30.7±10.0个月(范围10.8至49.3个月),V4组为17.3±6.9个月(范围0.25至38.5个月)。

结果

V3 ICL的前囊下混浊发生率显著高于V4 ICL(12.6%对2.9%,P<0.001)。差异主要归因于后期出现混浊的发生率较高(手术后≥1年;9.2%对(0.6%),P<0.001)。V3组拱高不良的眼比例更高(23.6%对4.3%,P<0.001),且拱高不良与后期前囊下混浊的发生高度相关(P<0.001)。V3 ICL中具有临床意义的白内障比V4 ICL更常见(9.2%对0.8%,P<0.001),白内障摘除也是如此(6.9%对0.2%,P<0.001),以及ICL置换的需求(5.7%对1.1%,P<0.001)。V3和V4设计之间混浊率的差异并非由于术后随访的差异。

结论

植入目前使用的V4 Staar Surgical型号ICL导致前囊下混浊、具有临床意义的白内障以及与ICL相关的二次手术显著减少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验