Greenspan Susan L, Emkey Ronald D, Bone Henry G, Weiss Stuart R, Bell Norman H, Downs Robert W, McKeever Clark, Miller Sam S, Davidson Michael, Bolognese Michael A, Mulloy Anthony L, Heyden Norman, Wu Mei, Kaur Amarjot, Lombardi Antonio
University of Pittsburgh, Osteoporosis Prevention and Treatment Center, Kaufmann Medical Building, Suite 1110, 3471 Fifth Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 2002 Dec 3;137(11):875-83. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-137-11-200212030-00008.
Combination therapy with alendronate and estrogen for 2 years increases bone mineral density at the spine and hip more than does therapy with either agent alone. Changes in bone mineral density after discontinuation of therapy have not been compared directly.
To determine the rate of bone loss when therapy with alendronate, estrogen, or both agents is discontinued.
Double-blind, placebo-controlled discontinuation trial.
18 U.S. centers.
244 postmenopausal, hysterectomized women 44 to 77 years of age.
2 years of therapy with alendronate, 10 mg/d (n = 92); conjugated estrogen, 0.625 mg/d (n = 143); alendronate and conjugated estrogen (n = 140); or placebo (n = 50). At year 3, women were allocated into five groups: Twenty-eight women continued to take placebo and 44 women continued to take combination therapy, but 50 women taking alendronate, 81 taking conjugated estrogen, and 41 taking combination therapy were switched to placebo.
Bone mineral density and biochemical markers of bone turnover.
Women taking alendronate or combination therapy who were switched to placebo for year 3 of the study maintained bone mass. Bone mineral density in these women was 4.1% (CI, 2.6% to 5.7%) and 6.6% (CI, 5.0% to 8.2%) higher, respectively, at the spine (P < 0.001 for both treatment comparisons) and 3.5% (CI, 2.3% to 4.6%) and 3.0% (CI, 1.8% to 4.2%) higher, respectively, at the trochanter (P < 0.001 for both treatment comparisons) than that in women previously taking estrogen who were switched to placebo. In contrast, women who were taking estrogen and were switched to placebo during year 3 experienced a 4.5% decrease at the spine (95% CI, -5.0% to -4.0%) and a 2.4% decrease at the trochanter (CI, -2.7% to -2.1%) (P < 0.001 for both changes). Compared with women who took placebo for 3 years, women who took estrogen for 2 years and were then switched to placebo had a bone mineral density that was 2.9% higher (CI, 1.2% to 4.6%) at the spine (P < 0.05) and 2.9% higher (CI, 1.6% to 4.2%) at the trochanter (P < 0.001). Changes in biochemical markers during year 3 did not differ among the groups that discontinued active treatment.
Accelerated bone loss is seen after withdrawal of estrogen therapy but not after withdrawal of alendronate or combination therapy. The differential effects after withdrawal of therapy should be considered in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis.
阿仑膦酸钠与雌激素联合治疗2年,在脊柱和髋部增加骨矿物质密度的效果比单独使用任一药物治疗更佳。治疗中断后骨矿物质密度的变化尚未直接比较。
确定停用阿仑膦酸钠、雌激素或两种药物联合治疗时的骨质流失率。
双盲、安慰剂对照的停药试验。
美国18个中心。
244名44至77岁的绝经后、子宫切除的女性。
阿仑膦酸钠10mg/d治疗2年(n = 92);结合雌激素0.625mg/d(n = 143);阿仑膦酸钠与结合雌激素联合治疗(n = 140);或安慰剂(n = 50)。在第3年,女性被分为五组:28名女性继续服用安慰剂,44名女性继续接受联合治疗,但50名服用阿仑膦酸钠的女性、81名服用结合雌激素的女性和41名接受联合治疗的女性改用安慰剂。
骨矿物质密度和骨转换的生化标志物。
在研究第3年改用安慰剂的服用阿仑膦酸钠或联合治疗的女性保持了骨量。这些女性在脊柱处的骨矿物质密度分别比之前服用雌激素后改用安慰剂的女性高4.1%(95%CI,2.6%至5.7%)和6.6%(95%CI,5.0%至8.2%)(两种治疗比较P均<0.001),在转子处分别高3.5%(95%CI,2.3%至4.6%)和3.0%(95%CI,1.8%至4.2%)(两种治疗比较P均<0.001)。相比之下,在第3年服用雌激素并改用安慰剂的女性在脊柱处骨量下降4.5%(95%CI,-5.0%至-4.0%),在转子处下降2.4%(95%CI,-2.7%至-2.1%)(两种变化P均<0.001)。与服用3年安慰剂的女性相比,服用2年雌激素然后改用安慰剂的女性在脊柱处骨矿物质密度高2.9%(95%CI,1.2%至4.6%)(P<0.05),在转子处高2.9%(95%CI,1.6%至4.2%)(P<0.001)。在停用活性治疗的组中,第3年生化标志物的变化无差异。
停用雌激素治疗后可见加速骨质流失,但停用阿仑膦酸钠或联合治疗后未出现。在绝经后骨质疏松症的管理中应考虑治疗停药后的不同效应。